The National Trial Lawyers
  • Home
    • Meet Our Team
    • Contact Us
    • Mission & Goals
    • FAQ
  • Webinars
  • News
  • Membership Directory
    • Top 100 Map – Civil Plaintiff
    • Top 100 Map – Criminal Defense
    • Top 40 Under 40 Map – Civil Plaintiff
    • Top 40 Under 40 Map – Criminal Defense
  • Top 100
    • Civil Plaintiff Officers / Executive Committee
    • Criminal Defense Officers / Executive Committee
    • Benefits
    • About
    • Top 100 Presidents Message
    • Diplomat
    • Membership Renewal
    • Member Profile Updates
    • Top 100 Badge
  • Top 40
    • Civil Plaintiff Officers / Executive Committee
    • Criminal Defense Officers / Executive Committee
    • Top 40 Under 40 Trial Academy Bootcamp
    • Benefits
    • About
    • Top 40 Presidents Message
    • Membership Renewal
    • Member Profile Updates
    • Top 40 Badge
  • Specialty Assoc
    • About
    • Shop
    • Officers
    • Membership Renewal
    • Member Profile Updates
  • Nominate
    • Top 100
    • Top 40
    • Specialty Association
    • Trial Lawyer Hall of Fame
    • Trial Lawyer of the Year
    • Trial Team of the Year
    • America’s Most Influential Trial Lawyer
    • America’s Most Influential Law Firm
    • Lifetime Achievement Award
  • Shop
  • Magazine
    • A-List
  • Education and Networking Agenda
    • Trial Lawyers Summit
    • Top 40 Under 40 Trial Academy Boot Camp
    • Mass Torts Made Perfect
    • The Lanier Trial Academy Master Class 6.0
    • The Business Of Law
    • Webinars
  • Hall of Fame
    • Trial Lawyer Hall of Fame

107 Women Lawyers Share Personal Abortion Experience With The Supreme Court

Posted on January 15, 2016 by Larry Bodine
Texas Senator Wendy Davis filed a brief with four other elected officials. She speaks of her two abortions due to a medical complication and a life threatening brain malformation in the fetus.

Texas Senator Wendy Davis filed a brief with four other elected officials. She speaks of her two abortions due to a medical complication and a life threatening brain malformation in the fetus.

In an amicus curiae brief to the Supreme Court, 107 women lawyers and six female law students urged the Court to invalidate provisions of the Texas bill at issue in Whole Woman’s Health v. Cole that places restrictions on abortion clinics.

The brief did not rely on constitutional arguments, but instead told the individual stories of law professors, former judges, appellate attorneys, law clerks, and other attorneys who ended pregnancies due to medical complications, unintended pregnancies, abusive relationships and teen pregnancies.

Texas law imposes clinic restrictions

The case is set for argument on March 2, 2016 and will determine whether two restrictions imposed by Texas House Bill 2 create an “undue burden” on a woman’s right to obtain an abortion, a standard from the 1992 case, Planned Parenthood of S.E. Pennsylvania v.  Casey.  The bill requires that a doctor performing abortions have admitting privileges to a hospital within 30 miles of the clinic, and that the clinic must meet the same standards as ambulatory surgical facilities.

The women in the brief wrote, that like the one in three American women who have terminated a pregnancy in their lifetimes, having “meaningful access to reproductive choice” has allowed them the “opportunity to fully participate in the economic and social life of the nation as promised in Casey.”  The intention for the brief, they wrote, is to “inform the Court of the impact” its decisions in Roe and Casey has had “on the lives of women attorneys, and by extension, on this nation,”

Through the personal narratives, the women humanize the issue of reproductive choice and discuss their belief that “they would not have been able to achieve the personal or professional successes they have achieved were it not for their ability to obtain safe and legal abortions.”

Personal accounts of abortion access

One public defender wrote of breaking the three-generation cycle of teenage pregnancy and an emotionally abusive relationship when she had an abortion at 16 years old.  She writes that her access to a safe abortion saved her from the “dreams deferred, the plans derailed, the poverty endured” that she has witnessed of other teen mothers.

A law professor wrote of her ability to continue her graduate studies and leave an abusive partner after a contraceptive failure left her pregnant.  She credits being able to have an abortion with saving her “child from having an abusive father, and allowed [her] to use [her] education for the social good.”

Another discussed her ability to leave an abusive partner after an unplanned pregnancy at 35 years old.  She wrote that the ability to choose the father of her children allowed her to keep a successful career and eventually marry and have two children later in life.

Another law professor wrote that the Court’s decision in Webster requiring a judicial bypass provision to parental consent abortion laws saved her from “self-abortion by clothes hanger…and suicide.”  She wrote that “were it not for [her] ability to have a safe and legal abortion that day” she would have ended up dead or unable to follow the life path of her choosing.

Medically necessary abortion

Lawyers in the brief also wrote about their medically necessary abortions due to the likelihood of severe birth defects or a medical danger posed to the mother.  During her sixth month of pregnancy, a partner at a major law firm terminated her pregnancy after discovering her unborn had a very rare heart disease, causing congestive heart failure in utero.  With a less than 10 percent chance of making it term, and less than 1 percent chance of surviving his first year of life, the lawyer and her husband decided it “would be selfish” to continue the pregnancy.

An appellate attorney who has argued in front of the Supreme Court discussed the opportunities she has been able to pursue as an attorney, wife, and mother, which would not have been afforded to her if doctors had not been able to treat her two dangerous pregnancies.

The brief provides a counter to the pro-life stories of women who regret having abortions.  These stories “demonstrate the real world effects of abortion access on the lives and careers of women attorneys” allowing them to participate in what was written in Casey as the “economic and social life of the Nation.”

The case is Whole Woman’s Health, et al. v. Kirk Cole M.D., Commission of The Texas Department of State Health Services, et al., case number 15-274 in the Supreme Court of the United States.

 

Posted in Blog, Civil Rights

One thought on “107 Women Lawyers Share Personal Abortion Experience With The Supreme Court”

  1. Vivian Beckerle on January 28, 2016 at 9:58 am said:

    I personally know of a young woman who had an abortion. She was in high school, an A student involved in campus life by being on yearbook staff. The boy was totally disinterested in her future and was supported by his parents in his attitude. She, on the other hand, planned to go to college. Because Planned Parenthood was there for her, she could continue, finish high school, go to college — again straight A’s — then to law school and is now an attorney. She did the right thing. She believes she did the right thing. She is not depressed that she had an abortion & now has two children whom she can provide for because she is a professional and not begging the state for support for her children. That would not have been the scenario if she had not had the self-determination regarding her own healthcare at that time and the loving support of her parents. No one knows where the boy went. Hmmm.

News Categories

Read about other Top Jury Verdicts

No thumbnail available

Things to Consider When You Sue an Insurance Provider

We are all too acquainted with insurance coverage in our everyday lives. According to Investopedia, everyone should have[Read More...]
The Rochester Diocese Offers a $147 Million Settlement to Sex Abuse Survivors

The Rochester Diocese Offers a $147 Million Settlement to Sex Abuse Survivors

The Rochester Catholic Diocese is offering a $147 million settlement to sex abuse survivors. This offer comes as a federal ba[Read More...]
Jury Awards $77.5 Million to an Army Veteran in a 3M Earplug Case

Jury Awards $77.5 Million to an Army Veteran in a 3M Earplug Case

A jury in Pensacola, Fla., federal court on Friday ordered 3M to pay $77.5 million to a U.S. Army veteran who said he suffe[Read More...]
The New Mexico Supreme Court Upholds $165 Million Damage Awards in a Deadly FedEx Crash

The New Mexico Supreme Court Upholds $165 Million Damage Awards in a Deadly FedEx Crash

The New Mexico Supreme Court on Thursday upheld $165 million of jury awards against FedEx in a wrongful-death lawsuit stemmin[Read More...]
Noom Reaches a $56 Million Class Action Settlement Over Its Autorenewal and Cancellation Policy

Noom Reaches a $56 Million Class Action Settlement Over Its Autorenewal and Cancellation Policy

Weight-loss program Noom has agreed to a $56 million settlement to resolve class action claims regarding its autorenewal and [Read More...]

#LegalNews

@@TheNTLtop100

Contact Us | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

Attorney information and content provided on this website is provided for the benefit of members of The National Trial Lawyers and as a public service by Legal Associations Management, Inc. The website and all data are the property of Legal Associations Management, Inc. Data, including without limitation attorney information and content, on the site may not be mined, sold, or used commercially for any purpose without the explicit written consent of Legal Associations Management, Inc. This site may not be accessed by any automated program for extracting data for any use. By accessing and using the site you agree that you will not develop, support or use software, devices, scripts, robots, or any other means or processes (including crawlers, browser plug-ins and add-ons, or any other technology) to scrape data or otherwise copy profiles and other data. Unauthorized use or attempted unauthorized use of this system may subject you to both civil and criminal penalties.