The National Trial Lawyers
  • Home
    • Meet Our Team
    • Contact Us
    • Mission & Goals
    • FAQ
  • Webinars
  • News
  • Membership Directory
    • Top 100 Map – Civil Plaintiff
    • Top 100 Map – Criminal Defense
    • Top 40 Under 40 Map – Civil Plaintiff
    • Top 40 Under 40 Map – Criminal Defense
  • Top 100
    • Civil Plaintiff Officers / Executive Committee
    • Criminal Defense Officers / Executive Committee
    • Benefits
    • About
    • Top 100 President’s Message
    • Diplomat
    • Membership Renewal
    • Member Profile Updates
    • Top 100 Badge
    • Media
  • Top 40
    • Civil Plaintiff Officers / Executive Committee
    • Criminal Defense Officers / Executive Committee
    • Top 40 Under 40 Trial Academy Bootcamp
    • Benefits
    • About
    • Top 40 President’s Message
    • Membership Renewal
    • Member Profile Updates
    • Top 40 Badge
    • Media
  • Specialty Assoc
    • About
    • Shop
    • Officers
    • Membership Renewal
    • Member Profile Updates
    • Media
  • Nominate
    • Top 100
    • Top 40
    • Specialty Association
    • Trial Lawyer Hall of Fame
    • Trial Lawyer of the Year
    • Trial Team of the Year
    • America’s Most Influential Trial Lawyer
    • America’s Most Influential Law Firm
    • Lifetime Achievement Award
  • Shop
  • Magazine
    • A-List
  • Education and Networking Agenda
    • Trial Lawyers Summit
      • Summit Sponsors
    • Top 40 Under 40 Trial Academy Boot Camp
    • Mass Torts Made Perfect
    • The Lanier Master Class 5.0 Trial Academy 2021
    • Webinars
  • Hall of Fame
    • Trial Lawyer Hall of Fame

Daughter’s Facebook Overshare Costs Father $80,000

Posted on March 6, 2014 by Andrew Findley
Legal News for consumers

Daughter’s Facebook boast costs dad $80,000 age discrimination settlement

Talk about oversharing too much information: a daughter’s Facebook boast about the settlement of an age discrimination lawsuit has cost her father $80,000.  When Patrick Snay, 69, was let go as the headmaster of Gulliver Preparatory School in Miami, he filed an age discrimination and retaliation lawsuit, which was settled for $80,000 in November 2011.  The settlement agreement contained a standard confidentiality clause preventing either party from talking about the terms.

Unfortunately, Snay told his teenage daughter Dana about the agreement, which included $10,000 in back pay, $60,000 for attorney’s fees, and the $80,000 settlement.  Snay told the Miami Herald that he felt obligated to explain it to his daughter because she suffered from “psychological scars” from peers at the school.  Dana, in turn, bragged about the settlement on Facebook to her 1,200 friends, many of whom attended Gulliver.  According to court documents, the post read: “Mama and Papa Snay won the case against Gulliver. Gulliver is now officially paying for my vacation to Europe this summer. SUCK IT.”  The post reached the school’s lawyers at the speed of social media, and on November 7, 2011, four days after reaching the deal, the attorneys told Snay they wouldn’t pay him.  Snay filed a motion to enforce the settlement on June 9, 2012, which he won, but the school won an appeal on February 26, 2014.

Snay says he never told Dana that he’d “won” the case, and that she didn’t go to Europe that summer.  “This, however, does not change our analysis,” wrote State of Florida Third District Court of Appeal Judge Linda Ann Wells in the order granting the appeal.  Judge Wells added, “Rather, before the ink was dry on the agreement, and notwithstanding the clear language of section 13 mandating confidentiality, Snay violated the agreement by doing exactly what he had promised not to do.”

The case is Gulliver Schools, Inc., a Florida corporation, and School Management Systems, Inc., a Florida corporation, appellants, vs. Patrick Snay, appellee, No. 3D13-1952, Lower Tribunal No. 10-62368.   Scott A. Cole and Kristen A. Tajak of Cole, Scott & Kissane were attorneys for the appellants.  Jonathan M. Streisfield, David L. Ferguson and Scott J. Weiselberg, of Kopelowitz Ostrow Ferguson Weiselberg Keechl were attorneys for Snay, the appellee.

Posted in Blog

Comments are closed.

News Categories

Subscribe to Blog and VFJ via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog, the Voice for Justice and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Read about other Top Jury Verdicts

Toyota Will Pay $180M to Settle Violations of the Clean-Air Act

Toyota Will Pay $180M to Settle Violations of the Clean-Air Act

The U.S. Department of Justice and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) announced today that the United States has[Read More...]
Boeing's Insitu Will Pay $25M to Settle a Whistleblower Complaint About Used Drone Parts

Boeing's Insitu Will Pay $25M to Settle a Whistleblower Complaint About Used Drone Parts

Bingen, Wash.-based Insitu, a Boeing subsidiary, has agreed to pay $25 million to settle allegations that it used recycl[Read More...]
Deutsche Bank Agrees to Settle Criminal and Civil Charges for $130M

Deutsche Bank Agrees to Settle Criminal and Civil Charges for $130M

DEUTSCHE Bank AG agreed to pay US$130 million to settle criminal and civil charges that it bribed foreign officials and manip[Read More...]
Boeing Pays $2.5B to Settle Charges Tied to the 737 MAX Crashes

Boeing Pays $2.5B to Settle Charges Tied to the 737 MAX Crashes

Boeing has agreed to pay just over $2.5 billion to resolve a federal charge of “criminal misconduct” for how its [Read More...]
Texas Attorney General Seeks $43M in Google Antitrust Lawsuit

Texas Attorney General Seeks $43M in Google Antitrust Lawsuit

The mass exodus of Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton's top staff over accusations of bribery against their former boss has le[Read More...]

#LegalNews

@@TheNTLtop100

Contact Us | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

Attorney information and content provided on this website is provided for the benefit of members of The National Trial Lawyers and as a public service by Legal Associations Management, Inc. The website and all data are the property of Legal Associations Management, Inc. Data, including without limitation attorney information and content, on the site may not be mined, sold, or used commercially for any purpose without the explicit written consent of Legal Associations Management, Inc. This site may not be accessed by any automated program for extracting data for any use. By accessing and using the site you agree that you will not develop, support or use software, devices, scripts, robots, or any other means or processes (including crawlers, browser plug-ins and add-ons, or any other technology) to scrape data or otherwise copy profiles and other data. Unauthorized use or attempted unauthorized use of this system may subject you to both civil and criminal penalties.