The National Trial Lawyers
  • Home
    • Meet Our Team
    • Contact Us
    • Mission & Goals
    • FAQ
  • Webinars
  • News
  • Membership Directory
    • Top 100 Map – Civil Plaintiff
    • Top 100 Map – Criminal Defense
    • Top 40 Under 40 Map – Civil Plaintiff
    • Top 40 Under 40 Map – Criminal Defense
  • Top 100
    • Civil Plaintiff Officers / Executive Committee
    • Criminal Defense Officers / Executive Committee
    • Benefits
    • About
    • Top 100 President’s Message
    • Diplomat
    • Membership Renewal
    • Member Profile Updates
    • Top 100 Badge
    • Media
  • Top 40
    • Civil Plaintiff Officers / Executive Committee
    • Criminal Defense Officers / Executive Committee
    • Top 40 Under 40 Trial Academy Bootcamp
    • Benefits
    • About
    • Top 40 President’s Message
    • Membership Renewal
    • Member Profile Updates
    • Top 40 Badge
    • Media
  • Specialty Assoc
    • About
    • Shop
    • Officers
    • Membership Renewal
    • Member Profile Updates
    • Media
  • Nominate
    • Top 100
    • Top 40
    • Specialty Association
    • Trial Lawyer Hall of Fame
    • Trial Lawyer of the Year
    • Trial Team of the Year
    • America’s Most Influential Trial Lawyer
    • America’s Most Influential Law Firm
    • Lifetime Achievement Award
  • Shop
  • Magazine
    • A-List
  • Education and Networking Agenda
    • Trial Lawyers Summit
      • Summit Sponsors
    • Top 40 Under 40 Trial Academy Boot Camp
    • Mass Torts Made Perfect
    • The Lanier Master Class 5.0 Trial Academy 2021
    • Webinars
  • Hall of Fame
    • Trial Lawyer Hall of Fame

$7.3 Million Medical Malpractice Verdict Upheld for Arizona Woman

Posted on April 7, 2014 by Andrew Findley
legal news for consumers

Plaintiff underwent several knee surgeries and evenual knee replacement, yet still suffered pain

The Arizona Court of Civil Appeals has upheld a $7.3 million verdict for a woman whose multiple knee surgeries and knee replacement left her in chronic pain and unable to walk normally.  Payson Healthcare Management (PHM) appealed the decision by a Gila County Superior Judge who awarded the damages to Lori Sandretto.

Sandretto slipped and fell on a wet floor and injured her right knee in April 2008. This led to surgery to repair a torn meniscus by a surgeon not involved in Sandretto’s lawsuit.  After the first surgery failed to alleviate her pain, Sandretto consulted a second physician, Dr. Charles Calkins, an orthopedic surgeon.  Calkins determined that Sandretto’s meniscus was still torn, so he performed a second knee operation on Sept. 5, 2008.  Calkins also drained fluid from Sandretto’s knee and tested for infection.

At first, Sandretto’s knee improved, but it later grew increasingly painful and swollen.  Calkins’ physician assistant prescribed antibiotics for a skin infection.  Two weeks later, Sandretto was taken to an emergency room, where Calkins also diagnosed a skin infection and changed her antibiotics.  Ten days later, the physician assistant drained more fluid from Sandretto’s knee and sent it out for testing.  The tests revealed she was infected with Staphylococcus aurues (MRSA), which is resistant to methicillin.

Sandretto underwent three subsequent “wash out” surgeries to try to rid her of the drug-resistant bacteria.  Eventually, she had to undergo a knee replacement.  She also developed Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS), a chronic pain condition.

Sandretto’s attorneys, Arthur Lloyd and Doris Robinson-Wait of Lloyd & Robinson, PLLC of Payson and National Trial Lawyers Top 100 attorney Thomas McGovern of McGovern Law Offices in Phoenix, called expert witnesses to the stand who testified that Sandretto might not have needed the knee replacement or developed the chronic pain condition if Calkins tested for the source of the infection sooner.  They also testified that Calkins should have worked more aggressively to take care of the infection.

Sandretto’s attorneys settled their claims with Calkins on the eve of her trial for $900,000, just under the maximum amount his malpractice insurance would pay.  Attorneys for PHM argued on appeal that they should have had more time to reconsider their strategy after Calkins agreed to settle.  Attorney Don Stevens of Phoenix also argued that the judge in the first trial erred in allowing several expert witnesses testify on behalf of Sandretto.  Stevens further argued that the judge should have allowed the jury to hear that Sandretto had other medical problems involving emotional issues and chronic pain.  The three judge appeals panel rejected all of PHM’s arguments, and upheld the verdict.

The case is Lori Sandretto v. Payson Healthcare Management, Inc. in the Arizona Court of Appeals Division Two,  No. 2 CA-CV 2013-0044.

Posted in Blog

Comments are closed.

News Categories

Subscribe to Blog and VFJ via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog, the Voice for Justice and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Read about other Top Jury Verdicts

Toyota Will Pay $180M to Settle Violations of the Clean-Air Act

Toyota Will Pay $180M to Settle Violations of the Clean-Air Act

The U.S. Department of Justice and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) announced today that the United States has[Read More...]
Boeing's Insitu Will Pay $25M to Settle a Whistleblower Complaint About Used Drone Parts

Boeing's Insitu Will Pay $25M to Settle a Whistleblower Complaint About Used Drone Parts

Bingen, Wash.-based Insitu, a Boeing subsidiary, has agreed to pay $25 million to settle allegations that it used recycl[Read More...]
Deutsche Bank Agrees to Settle Criminal and Civil Charges for $130M

Deutsche Bank Agrees to Settle Criminal and Civil Charges for $130M

DEUTSCHE Bank AG agreed to pay US$130 million to settle criminal and civil charges that it bribed foreign officials and manip[Read More...]
Boeing Pays $2.5B to Settle Charges Tied to the 737 MAX Crashes

Boeing Pays $2.5B to Settle Charges Tied to the 737 MAX Crashes

Boeing has agreed to pay just over $2.5 billion to resolve a federal charge of “criminal misconduct” for how its [Read More...]
Texas Attorney General Seeks $43M in Google Antitrust Lawsuit

Texas Attorney General Seeks $43M in Google Antitrust Lawsuit

The mass exodus of Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton's top staff over accusations of bribery against their former boss has le[Read More...]

#LegalNews

@@TheNTLtop100

Contact Us | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

Attorney information and content provided on this website is provided for the benefit of members of The National Trial Lawyers and as a public service by Legal Associations Management, Inc. The website and all data are the property of Legal Associations Management, Inc. Data, including without limitation attorney information and content, on the site may not be mined, sold, or used commercially for any purpose without the explicit written consent of Legal Associations Management, Inc. This site may not be accessed by any automated program for extracting data for any use. By accessing and using the site you agree that you will not develop, support or use software, devices, scripts, robots, or any other means or processes (including crawlers, browser plug-ins and add-ons, or any other technology) to scrape data or otherwise copy profiles and other data. Unauthorized use or attempted unauthorized use of this system may subject you to both civil and criminal penalties.