The National Trial Lawyers
  • Home
    • Meet Our Team
    • Contact Us
    • Mission & Goals
    • FAQ
  • Webinars
  • News
  • Membership Directory
    • Top 100 Map – Civil Plaintiff
    • Top 100 Map – Criminal Defense
    • Top 40 Under 40 Map – Civil Plaintiff
    • Top 40 Under 40 Map – Criminal Defense
  • Top 100
    • Civil Plaintiff Officers / Executive Committee
    • Criminal Defense Officers / Executive Committee
    • Benefits
    • About
    • Top 100 Presidents Message
    • Diplomat
    • Membership Renewal
    • Member Profile Updates
    • Top 100 Badge
  • Top 40
    • Civil Plaintiff Officers / Executive Committee
    • Criminal Defense Officers / Executive Committee
    • Top 40 Under 40 Trial Academy Bootcamp
    • Benefits
    • About
    • Top 40 Presidents Message
    • Membership Renewal
    • Member Profile Updates
    • Top 40 Badge
  • Specialty Assoc
    • About
    • Shop
    • Officers
    • Membership Renewal
    • Member Profile Updates
  • Nominate
    • Top 100
    • Top 40
    • Specialty Association
    • Trial Lawyer Hall of Fame
    • Trial Lawyer of the Year
    • Trial Team of the Year
    • America’s Most Influential Trial Lawyer
    • America’s Most Influential Law Firm
    • Lifetime Achievement Award
  • Shop
  • Magazine
    • A-List
  • Education and Networking Agenda
    • Trial Lawyers Summit
    • Top 40 Under 40 Trial Academy Boot Camp
    • Mass Torts Made Perfect
    • The Lanier Trial Academy Master Class 6.0
    • The Business Of Law
    • Webinars
  • Hall of Fame
    • Trial Lawyer Hall of Fame

$117M Settlement Against Fraudulent Chinese Forestry Company

Posted on May 21, 2014 by Larry Bodine
law news, legal news, settlement

Sino-Forest engaged in fraud and had massively misrepresented its assets and earnings.

An Ontario Court’s approval of a $117 million settlement in a securities class action was upheld when the Ontario Court of Appeal and Supreme Court of Canada refused to grant leave to hear appeals of the approval decision. Kirk M. Baert of  Koskie Minsky LLP and Siskinds LLP represent the plaintiff investors.

Sino-Forest, a Chinese forestry company traded on the Toronto Stock Exchange, became embroiled in a class action dispute after an independent research report was published on June 2, 2011. That report stated that Sino-Forest engaged in fraud and had “massively” misrepresented its assets and earnings.

Sino-Forest filed for bankruptcy protection under the Canadian Federal Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act on March 30, 2012. Class counsel appeared in bankruptcy court and argued for the protection of the class members’ interests. Justice Morawetz ordered the parties to enter into mediation on July 25, 2012.

As a result of the court-ordered mediation, one of the co-Defendants, the accounting firm Ernst and Young LLP, which had audited Sino-Forest’s books, entered into a settlement agreement with the class, which provided for a payment of $117 million dollars.

The settlement was approved by Justice Morawetz, however, a group of investors sought to defeat the settlement, claiming they wished to preserve their right to opt-out and pursue their own claims against Ernst and Young. This group sought leave to appeal the settlement decision to the Ontario Court of Appeal and the Supreme Court of Canada, however leave was denied in both instances.

The class action continues against the remaining defendants, including the company’s board of directors, the company itself and various brokerage firms.

The case is The Trustees of the Labourers’ Pension Fund of Central and Eastern Canada v. Sino Forest Corporation.

Posted in Blog, Business Law, Consumer Protection

Comments are closed.

Recent Posts

Virginians Will Receive $489 Million in a Payday Loan Settlement

Virginians Will Receive $489 Million in a Payday Loan Settlement

May 18th, 2022

Online payday loan companies that charged as much as 919% interest will spend $489 million to reimburse some 555,000 borrower[Read More...]
The State of Minnesota Will Pay $1.5 Million to a Man Who Alleged Excessive Force During an Arrest

The State of Minnesota Will Pay $1.5 Million to a Man Who Alleged Excessive Force During an Arrest

May 18th, 2022

Minneapolis has agreed to pay $1.5 million to a man who said police used excessive force when he was arrested during the prot[Read More...]
A $230 Million Settlement Is Reached Over a 2015 Southern California Oil Spill

A $230 Million Settlement Is Reached Over a 2015 Southern California Oil Spill

May 16th, 2022

The owner of an oil pipeline that spewed thousands of barrels of crude oil onto Southern California beaches in 2015 has agree[Read More...]
The LeClairRyan-UnitedLex Dispute Reaches a Pending $21 Million Settlement

The LeClairRyan-UnitedLex Dispute Reaches a Pending $21 Million Settlement

May 16th, 2022

After a prolonged mediation process, the LeClairRyan bankruptcy estate looks to have reached a sizable settlement in one of t[Read More...]
The Families of Holyoke Soldiers Home Victims Reach a $56 Million Settlement

The Families of Holyoke Soldiers Home Victims Reach a $56 Million Settlement

May 13th, 2022

Massachusetts has agreed to pay $56 million to settle a class-action lawsuit brought by the families of veterans who died or [Read More...]

Contact Us | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

Attorney information and content provided on this website is provided for the benefit of members of The National Trial Lawyers and as a public service by Legal Associations Management, Inc. The website and all data are the property of Legal Associations Management, Inc. Data, including without limitation attorney information and content, on the site may not be mined, sold, or used commercially for any purpose without the explicit written consent of Legal Associations Management, Inc. This site may not be accessed by any automated program for extracting data for any use. By accessing and using the site you agree that you will not develop, support or use software, devices, scripts, robots, or any other means or processes (including crawlers, browser plug-ins and add-ons, or any other technology) to scrape data or otherwise copy profiles and other data. Unauthorized use or attempted unauthorized use of this system may subject you to both civil and criminal penalties.