The National Trial Lawyers
  • Home
    • Meet Our Team
    • Contact Us
    • Mission & Goals
    • FAQ
  • Webinars
  • News
  • Membership Directory
    • Top 100 Map – Civil Plaintiff
    • Top 100 Map – Criminal Defense
    • Top 40 Under 40 Map – Civil Plaintiff
    • Top 40 Under 40 Map – Criminal Defense
  • Top 100
    • Civil Plaintiff Officers / Executive Committee
    • Criminal Defense Officers / Executive Committee
    • Benefits
    • About
    • Top 100 President’s Message
    • Diplomat
    • Membership Renewal
    • Member Profile Updates
    • Top 100 Badge
    • Media
  • Top 40
    • Civil Plaintiff Officers / Executive Committee
    • Criminal Defense Officers / Executive Committee
    • Top 40 Under 40 Trial Academy Bootcamp
    • Benefits
    • About
    • Top 40 President’s Message
    • Membership Renewal
    • Member Profile Updates
    • Top 40 Badge
    • Media
  • Specialty Assoc
    • About
    • Shop
    • Officers
    • Membership Renewal
    • Member Profile Updates
    • Media
  • Nominate
    • Top 100
    • Top 40
    • Specialty Association
    • Trial Lawyer Hall of Fame
    • Trial Lawyer of the Year
    • Trial Team of the Year
    • America’s Most Influential Trial Lawyer
    • America’s Most Influential Law Firm
    • Lifetime Achievement Award
  • Shop
  • Magazine
    • A-List
  • Education and Networking Agenda
    • Trial Lawyers Summit
      • Summit Sponsors
    • Top 40 Under 40 Trial Academy Boot Camp
    • Mass Torts Made Perfect
    • The Lanier Master Class 5.0 Trial Academy 2021
    • Webinars
  • Hall of Fame
    • Trial Lawyer Hall of Fame

Medtronic Settles 1,000 Bone Graft Cases for $22 Million

Posted on May 15, 2014 by Larry Bodine


legal news, law news, lawyers, settlements

This article originally appeared on Lawyers and Settlements.

Medtronic, the maker of a spinal bone graft product called Infuse Bone Graft, agreed on May 9 to pay $22 million to settle about 1,000 lawsuits stemming from claims of adverse health outcomes related to the product and claims that the manufacturer illegally promoted the Medtronic bone product for off-label uses. Medtronic is also reportedly preparing a further $140 million to settle an even larger number of anticipated claims.

Medtronic allegedly encouraged physicians to use its Infuse bone stimulator off-label in the cervical spine, which helped generate sales of more than $3 billion for the manufacturer. As of September 2008, about 680,000 units of Infuse Bone Grafts had been used in the US, according to Medtronic.

law news, legal news, verdict, settlement, Medtronic, bone graftAccording to a report by the Senate committee investigating the product, the company’s undisclosed manipulation of information through the medical literature included overstating its benefits and downplaying concerns about serious complications. According to MedPage Today, during the past 15 years, Medtronic has paid $210 million in royalties and other payments to a group of 13 doctors and two corporations linked to doctors. Many of the lawsuits claim that it was by paying spinal surgeons the company was able to promote the off-label use of Infuse.

The $22 million will resolve the claims of some 950 people. A further 750 cases brought by 1,200 people are pending across the use, and there could be another 2,600 claims yet to be brought.

Used in more than 1 million patients

Despite FDA reports of complications over the past four years resulting from the off-label use of Medtronic Inc.’s Infuse Bone Graft, Medtronic is not admitting liability in the settlement, and the company “continues to stand behind INFUSE Bone Graft,” according to a Medtronic statement.

Medtronic must have deep pockets: it paid $210 million in payments and royalties to 13 doctors and two corporations linked to doctors. Then again, its Infuse product, which is also known as BMP-2, has been used in more than one million patients since the FDA approved it more than 10 years ago. The product generated sales of $800 million a year, though the amount has declined since 2011 – when the lawsuits started pouring in.

One cynical attorney believes this settlement is simply the “cost of doing business.” Up to 85 percent of those million people had the bone graft surgery off-label.

Dr. Dan Spengler, a Vanderbilt University orthopedic surgeon, said that with many off-label surgeries, there are going to be problems. He suspected that many of the lawsuits involved patients who experienced excess bone growth that occurred after their off-label surgery.

Many of the lawsuits claim that Medtronic illegally promoted Infuse off-label, i.e., for uses that were not approved by the FDA, through its payments to the spine surgeons. One spine surgeon, Dr. Jeffrey Wang, received an undisclosed $459,500 between 2004 and 2007 from Medtronic, Bone Biologics, FzioMed and the DePuy unit of Johnson & Johnson, according to The Los Angeles Times. Wang is currently being sued for fraud and malpractice for surgeries using the Infuse bone graft.

Dr. Mark Ipsen has a number of lawsuits filed against him, again for using the Medtronic product off-label during surgery. He has been accused of medical malpractice, failure to obtain informed consent and fraud. An estimated 2,300 surgeons have used Medtronic products in the US before any serious side effects were reported.

More lawsuits filed in both federal and state courts are still to be settled, according to Medtronic’s recent financial reports. Attorneys general in California, Illinois, Massachusetts, Oregon and Washington have subpoenaed documents regarding Medtronic’s sales and marketing of the product.

Posted in Blog, Product Liability

Comments are closed.

News Categories

Subscribe to Blog and VFJ via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog, the Voice for Justice and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Read about other Top Jury Verdicts

Toyota Will Pay $180M to Settle Violations of the Clean-Air Act

Toyota Will Pay $180M to Settle Violations of the Clean-Air Act

The U.S. Department of Justice and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) announced today that the United States has[Read More...]
Boeing's Insitu Will Pay $25M to Settle a Whistleblower Complaint About Used Drone Parts

Boeing's Insitu Will Pay $25M to Settle a Whistleblower Complaint About Used Drone Parts

Bingen, Wash.-based Insitu, a Boeing subsidiary, has agreed to pay $25 million to settle allegations that it used recycl[Read More...]
Deutsche Bank Agrees to Settle Criminal and Civil Charges for $130M

Deutsche Bank Agrees to Settle Criminal and Civil Charges for $130M

DEUTSCHE Bank AG agreed to pay US$130 million to settle criminal and civil charges that it bribed foreign officials and manip[Read More...]
Boeing Pays $2.5B to Settle Charges Tied to the 737 MAX Crashes

Boeing Pays $2.5B to Settle Charges Tied to the 737 MAX Crashes

Boeing has agreed to pay just over $2.5 billion to resolve a federal charge of “criminal misconduct” for how its [Read More...]
Texas Attorney General Seeks $43M in Google Antitrust Lawsuit

Texas Attorney General Seeks $43M in Google Antitrust Lawsuit

The mass exodus of Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton's top staff over accusations of bribery against their former boss has le[Read More...]

#LegalNews

@@TheNTLtop100

Contact Us | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

Attorney information and content provided on this website is provided for the benefit of members of The National Trial Lawyers and as a public service by Legal Associations Management, Inc. The website and all data are the property of Legal Associations Management, Inc. Data, including without limitation attorney information and content, on the site may not be mined, sold, or used commercially for any purpose without the explicit written consent of Legal Associations Management, Inc. This site may not be accessed by any automated program for extracting data for any use. By accessing and using the site you agree that you will not develop, support or use software, devices, scripts, robots, or any other means or processes (including crawlers, browser plug-ins and add-ons, or any other technology) to scrape data or otherwise copy profiles and other data. Unauthorized use or attempted unauthorized use of this system may subject you to both civil and criminal penalties.