The National Trial Lawyers
  • Home
    • Meet Our Team
    • Contact Us
    • Mission & Goals
    • FAQ
  • Webinars
  • News
  • Membership Directory
    • Top 100 Map – Civil Plaintiff
    • Top 100 Map – Criminal Defense
    • Top 40 Under 40 Map – Civil Plaintiff
    • Top 40 Under 40 Map – Criminal Defense
  • Top 100
    • Civil Plaintiff Officers / Executive Committee
    • Criminal Defense Officers / Executive Committee
    • Benefits
    • About
    • Top 100 Presidents Message
    • Diplomat
    • Membership Renewal
    • Member Profile Updates
    • Top 100 Badge
  • Top 40
    • Civil Plaintiff Officers / Executive Committee
    • Criminal Defense Officers / Executive Committee
    • Top 40 Under 40 Trial Academy Bootcamp
    • Benefits
    • About
    • Top 40 Presidents Message
    • Membership Renewal
    • Member Profile Updates
    • Top 40 Badge
  • Specialty Assoc
    • About
    • Shop
    • Officers
    • Membership Renewal
    • Member Profile Updates
  • Nominate
    • Top 100
    • Top 40
    • Specialty Association
    • Trial Lawyer Hall of Fame
    • Trial Lawyer of the Year
    • Trial Team of the Year
    • America’s Most Influential Trial Lawyer
    • America’s Most Influential Law Firm
    • Lifetime Achievement Award
  • Shop
  • Magazine
    • A-List
  • Education and Networking Agenda
    • Trial Lawyers Summit
    • Top 40 Under 40 Trial Academy Boot Camp
    • Mass Torts Made Perfect
    • The Lanier Trial Academy Master Class 6.0
    • The Business Of Law
    • Webinars
  • Hall of Fame
    • Trial Lawyer Hall of Fame

Senior Citizen Crushed by Unsecured Tow Truck Recovers $1.74M

Posted on July 29, 2014 by Larry Bodine
ntl top 100 trial lawyers tow truck

The plaintiff needed to receive a net verdict in excess of $1 million to receive any new compensation.

An elderly man who was crushed when an unoccupied flatbed tow truck rolled backwards into him, breaking both of his legs, has recovered a total of $1,745,309 in a two-part settlement.

The driver failed to properly set the parking brake when exiting the cab of the tow truck. The injury caused past medical expenses of $330,000 and a significant diminution of the quality of life.

Dean Bauer, who lived in a small community in Minnesota, called AAA for a tow on July 19, 2001 because his pickup would not start.  When the tow truck arrived, Bauer and the tow truck driver who worked for Onamia Service Center decided to try to see if they could try to start it so they popped the hood.

Bauer was in front of his truck looking into the engine compartment when the tow truck rolled back and pinned him between his truck and the tow truck. Bauer, now age 68, is married with 3 adult children and 5 grandchildren.  He retired on the day of the accident from a small business he owned doing commercial and residential trade work.

Bauer sued the tow truck company in a rural county in Minnesota.

A settlement and a verdict

The tow truck company had $1 million in insurance. They paid $765,000 to settle the bodily injury (BI) case on October 15, 2013. “We decided to settle because the case venue was in a very poor Minnesota rural county that had never seen a million dollar verdict,” says plaintiff lawyer Robert Christensen of Minneapolis, MN, a member of The National Trial Lawyers Top 100 Trial Lawyers.

The plaintiff had $500,000 in underinsurance (UIM) coverage so he sued his own insurance company in Dakota County — one of seven metropolitan counties in the greater Twin Cities area with a much higher per capita income. The plaintiff rejected a settlement offer of $100,000 and decided to try the case.

Under Minnesota law, the tow truck company was not underinsured if the net damages recovered in the UIM case were less than $1 million.

“For example, if the damages awarded by the jury were a net $999,999 he would recover $0. However, if the net verdict were $1,001,000 he would recover the $1.00, plus he would recover the “gap” of $235,000 which represents the difference between the one million in BI coverage and the BI settlement amount of $765,000.

The net verdict far exceeded the $1,265,000 amount needed to collect the entire $500,000 in coverage,” Christensen says. The UIM case was tried and the verdict rendered on June 13, 2014.  The case settled on July 1, 2014.

The case is Dean Bauer v. AAA (Auto Club Group), Case Number: 19HA-CV-13-4463, Dakota County District Court, before Judge Thomas M. Pugh.

Posted in Auto Accidents, Blog, Personal Injury

Comments are closed.

News Categories

Read about other Top Jury Verdicts

Total Settlement in Surfside Condo Collapse Tops $1 Billion

Total Settlement in Surfside Condo Collapse Tops $1 Billion

The proposed settlement reached nearly a year after the catastrophic Surfside building collapse along the South Flo[Read More...]
UCLA Will Pay Nearly $700 Million in Abuse Lawsuits

UCLA Will Pay Nearly $700 Million in Abuse Lawsuits

The University of California system announced Tuesday it will pay nearly $375 million to more than 300 women who said they we[Read More...]
Things to Consider When You Sue an Insurance Provider

Things to Consider When You Sue an Insurance Provider

We are all too acquainted with insurance coverage in our everyday lives. According to Investopedia, everyone should have[Read More...]
The Rochester Diocese Offers a $147 Million Settlement to Sex Abuse Survivors

The Rochester Diocese Offers a $147 Million Settlement to Sex Abuse Survivors

The Rochester Catholic Diocese is offering a $147 million settlement to sex abuse survivors. This offer comes as a federal ba[Read More...]
Jury Awards $77.5 Million to an Army Veteran in a 3M Earplug Case

Jury Awards $77.5 Million to an Army Veteran in a 3M Earplug Case

A jury in Pensacola, Fla., federal court on Friday ordered 3M to pay $77.5 million to a U.S. Army veteran who said he suffe[Read More...]

#LegalNews

@@TheNTLtop100

Contact Us | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

Attorney information and content provided on this website is provided for the benefit of members of The National Trial Lawyers and as a public service by Legal Associations Management, Inc. The website and all data are the property of Legal Associations Management, Inc. Data, including without limitation attorney information and content, on the site may not be mined, sold, or used commercially for any purpose without the explicit written consent of Legal Associations Management, Inc. This site may not be accessed by any automated program for extracting data for any use. By accessing and using the site you agree that you will not develop, support or use software, devices, scripts, robots, or any other means or processes (including crawlers, browser plug-ins and add-ons, or any other technology) to scrape data or otherwise copy profiles and other data. Unauthorized use or attempted unauthorized use of this system may subject you to both civil and criminal penalties.