The National Trial Lawyers
  • Home
    • Meet Our Team
    • Contact Us
    • Mission & Goals
    • FAQ
  • Webinars
  • News
  • Membership Directory
    • Top 100 Map – Civil Plaintiff
    • Top 100 Map – Criminal Defense
    • Top 40 Under 40 Map – Civil Plaintiff
    • Top 40 Under 40 Map – Criminal Defense
  • Top 100
    • Civil Plaintiff Officers / Executive Committee
    • Criminal Defense Officers / Executive Committee
    • Benefits
    • About
    • Top 100 Presidents Message
    • Diplomat
    • Membership Renewal
    • Member Profile Updates
    • Top 100 Badge
  • Top 40
    • Civil Plaintiff Officers / Executive Committee
    • Criminal Defense Officers / Executive Committee
    • Top 40 Under 40 Trial Academy Bootcamp
    • Benefits
    • About
    • Top 40 Presidents Message
    • Membership Renewal
    • Member Profile Updates
    • Top 40 Badge
  • Specialty Assoc
    • About
    • Shop
    • Officers
    • Membership Renewal
    • Member Profile Updates
  • Nominate
    • Top 100
    • Top 40
    • Specialty Association
    • Trial Lawyer Hall of Fame
    • Trial Lawyer of the Year
    • Trial Team of the Year
    • America’s Most Influential Trial Lawyer
    • America’s Most Influential Law Firm
    • Lifetime Achievement Award
  • Shop
  • Magazine
    • A-List
  • Education and Networking Agenda
    • Trial Lawyers Summit
    • Top 40 Under 40 Trial Academy Boot Camp
    • Mass Torts Made Perfect
    • The Lanier Trial Academy Master Class 6.0
    • The Business Of Law
    • Webinars
  • Hall of Fame
    • Trial Lawyer Hall of Fame

18 Common Defense Attacks in the Mild Traumatic Brain Injury Case

Posted on August 18, 2014 by Larry Bodine
shark attack defense traumatic brain injury

The single best way to rebut these common defense attacks is by showing the worthiness of your client.

By Steven M. Gursten.

There is something ironic about how many skilled defense lawyers attack and undermine the mild traumatic brain injury (MTBI) case. A jury must find a plaintiff likeable, honest and credible to want to help him or her and return a fair verdict. But in so many of these cases involving MTBI, it’s often the brain injury itself that makes a plaintiff unlikable.

Nevertheless, there are several things we as lawyers can do to improve the odds of winning these cases. And the most important thing starts in case selection. Simply put, there are some cases you probably should reconsider before investing hundreds of hours of your time and tens of thousands of dollars in costs into taking these cases to trial.

Three fleas and it’s a dog

 One expression that has saved me from a lot of pain over the years — and one I’ve come to regret when I’ve ignored it — is “Three fleas and it’s a dog.” These “fleas” are exactly where the most skilled defense lawyers will attack and pick apart your client’s likeability, honesty and credibility.  Once you get to three or more points where your client is vulnerable to defense attacks, you may want to reconsider if this is truly a case you want to take to trial.

The bottom line is that people with brain injury are worthy of our help. Helping the survivors of MTBI is one of the noblest fights a personal injury attorney can join. You are truly helping the underdog, as these people desperately need help and competent, understanding legal representation.

We as attorneys stop referring to our clients as victims in the courtroom. We should be framing these cases and our clients as survivors.

What makes it worse is that so many of these common defense attacks are completely unfair. They contradict well-established medicine and the science of mild traumatic brain injury.  For example, if a defense neuropsychologist finds poor motivation, she is not saying that your client does not have a brain injury. She is only saying that the testing results are invalid, for whatever reason – chronic pain, fatigue, depression, or a conscious effort to perform badly and deceive the tester.

Defense lawyers will emphasize “malingering” because it harms your client’s credibility.  Malingering is but one of many possible legitimate explanations, but the allegation of malingering puts a cloud of suspicion over everything that happens at trial.

The medicine is clear that you do not need a loss of consciousness to suffer a brain injury. The science has shown that people can be seriously hurt and sometimes even killed in automobile accidents involving minor vehicle damage. But what juries commonly believe is a serious brain injury, and what the medicine is, are sometimes two very different things.

18 of the most common defense attacks

  1. No accompanying physical injuries.  A brain injury is always easier to accept and believe when there are physical injuries such as herniated disks or fractures from the same motor vehicle accident.
  2. No or very little vehicle damage.
  3. No loss of consciousness.
  4. A delay of many weeks or months before a TBI diagnosis.
  5. Changing and evolving histories by the plaintiff.
  6. Poor grades and prior school performance.
  7. Poor prior work performance and a spotty job history.
  8. A history of prior lawsuits and prior accidents.
  9. Any claim involving disability.
  10. Prior work injuries and workers compensation claims.
  11. Physical assaults and sports injuries.
  12. A diagnosis of malingering or exaggeration made by a treating doctor (usually very difficult to overcome).
  13. A plaintiff who is wearing a soft tissue cervical collar or sunglasses for weeks or months after a motor vehicle accident.
  14. Damaging surveillance.
  15. Attorney referrals to medical doctors.
  16. A criminal record, especially one involving theft, dishonesty or false statements.
  17. No lay witnesses, such as friends and family who can corroborate the injuries, and no co-workers or supervisors who can testify on your client’s behalf. Lay witness testimony in these cases is vital.
  18. Ethnic prejudice. Unfortunately, this is a real problem that exists today. An illegal immigrant laborer will not fare well with a “blue-collar” jury in Detroit or Flint. Defense lawyers and insurance companies typically will contest the cases of illegal immigrants more aggressively than they will with other cases.  They’re also more likely to be red-flagged for Special Investigations Units early on.

 

How to rebut these common defense attacks

The single best way is by showing the worthiness of your client. “Worthiness” translates into helping show how your client has demonstrated conservative or “American” values throughout his life. When the plaintiff demonstrates values that are important to jurors, this makes the plaintiff more worthy and credible.

Some of these values include a history of hard work, self-reliance and personal responsibility. Self-sacrifice, volunteering, loyalty to family, to an employer and to our county; compassion toward others, support of family and faith.

It also helps tremendously if we as attorneys stop referring to our clients as victims in the courtroom. We should be framing these cases and our clients as survivors, as people who have worked extremely hard to try to overcome the obstacles that someone else’s carelessness and negligence have placed in their paths. Don’t allow your client to roll over and play dead.  Instead, show how hard they’re working to get better and overcome the challenges they now face.

Ultimately, these are “invisible injury” cases.  The jury must believe the plaintiff, and must believe the plaintiff is worthy of help, if they are going to be motivated to return a verdict.  Anything you can do to rebut these 18 common defense attacks by making your client more worthy of help, and of making your client more likeable, credible and honest, will help to secure a meaningful and fair result.


Steve GurstenBased in Farmington Hills, MI, Steven M. Gursten is recognized as one of the nation’s top attorneys handling serious auto accident injury and wrongful death cases, and no-fault insurance litigation. He is head of Michigan Auto Law, the state’s largest law firm handling car accident, truck accident and motorcycle accident cases for more than 50 years.

 

Posted in Blog, Trial Practice

Comments are closed.

News Categories

Read about other Top Jury Verdicts

Salmon Purchasers Reach an $85 Million Price Fixing Settlement

Salmon Purchasers Reach an $85 Million Price Fixing Settlement

According to Reuters, who had seen the proposed settlement after it was filed on 25 May, the settlement will r[Read More...]
Ford Agrees to Pay $19 Million to Settle False Fuel Economy and Payload Claims

Ford Agrees to Pay $19 Million to Settle False Fuel Economy and Payload Claims

Ford Motor Company as agreed to a $19.2 million multistate settlement among 40 attorneys general that concluded an investigat[Read More...]
Total Settlement in Surfside Condo Collapse Tops $1 Billion

Total Settlement in Surfside Condo Collapse Tops $1 Billion

The proposed settlement reached nearly a year after the catastrophic Surfside building collapse along the South Flo[Read More...]
UCLA Will Pay Nearly $700 Million in Abuse Lawsuits

UCLA Will Pay Nearly $700 Million in Abuse Lawsuits

The University of California system announced Tuesday it will pay nearly $375 million to more than 300 women who said they we[Read More...]
Things to Consider When You Sue an Insurance Provider

Things to Consider When You Sue an Insurance Provider

We are all too acquainted with insurance coverage in our everyday lives. According to Investopedia, everyone should have[Read More...]

#LegalNews

@@TheNTLtop100

Contact Us | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

Attorney information and content provided on this website is provided for the benefit of members of The National Trial Lawyers and as a public service by Legal Associations Management, Inc. The website and all data are the property of Legal Associations Management, Inc. Data, including without limitation attorney information and content, on the site may not be mined, sold, or used commercially for any purpose without the explicit written consent of Legal Associations Management, Inc. This site may not be accessed by any automated program for extracting data for any use. By accessing and using the site you agree that you will not develop, support or use software, devices, scripts, robots, or any other means or processes (including crawlers, browser plug-ins and add-ons, or any other technology) to scrape data or otherwise copy profiles and other data. Unauthorized use or attempted unauthorized use of this system may subject you to both civil and criminal penalties.