The National Trial Lawyers
  • Home
    • Meet Our Team
    • Contact Us
    • Mission & Goals
    • FAQ
  • Webinars
  • News
  • Membership Directory
    • Top 100 Map – Civil Plaintiff
    • Top 100 Map – Criminal Defense
    • Top 40 Under 40 Map – Civil Plaintiff
    • Top 40 Under 40 Map – Criminal Defense
  • Top 100
    • Civil Plaintiff Officers / Executive Committee
    • Criminal Defense Officers / Executive Committee
    • Benefits
    • About
    • Top 100 Presidents Message
    • Diplomat
    • Membership Renewal
    • Member Profile Updates
    • Top 100 Badge
  • Top 40
    • Civil Plaintiff Officers / Executive Committee
    • Criminal Defense Officers / Executive Committee
    • Top 40 Under 40 Trial Academy Bootcamp
    • Benefits
    • About
    • Top 40 Presidents Message
    • Membership Renewal
    • Member Profile Updates
    • Top 40 Badge
  • Specialty Assoc
    • About
    • Shop
    • Officers
    • Membership Renewal
    • Member Profile Updates
  • Nominate
    • Top 100
    • Top 40
    • Specialty Association
    • Trial Lawyer Hall of Fame
    • Trial Lawyer of the Year
    • Trial Team of the Year
    • America’s Most Influential Trial Lawyer
    • America’s Most Influential Law Firm
    • Lifetime Achievement Award
  • Shop
  • Magazine
    • A-List
  • Education and Networking Agenda
    • Trial Lawyers Summit
    • Top 40 Under 40 Trial Academy Boot Camp
    • Mass Torts Made Perfect
    • The Lanier Trial Academy Master Class 6.0
    • The Business Of Law
    • Webinars
  • Hall of Fame
    • Trial Lawyer Hall of Fame

Texas Jury awards $73 Million in Pelvic Mesh Case

Posted on September 12, 2014 by Larry Bodine

law news, legal news, jury verdict, case settlement

Boston Scientific deliberately withheld from doctors a clinical study that proved serious complications resulted from the its mesh implant.

A 12-person jury on Sept. 8 ordered Boston Scientific Corp. to pay a Texas woman $73 million after finding the company negligent in both the design and marketing of its Obtryx transvaginal mesh sling.

The case, Salazar vs. Lopez, was the first to go to trial against Boston Scientific in Texas state court, and the first to render a verdict against the company — a hopeful sign for thousands of woman bringing similar product liability lawsuits in state and federal courts across the country.  The jury’s award included $50 million in punitive damages, far exceeding amounts awarded in previous pelvic mesh cases.

See our earlier reports:

Coloplast Settles 400 Pelvic Mesh Cases for $16 Million

$830M Settlement Announced in 20,000 Transvaginal Mesh Cases

Texas Jury Orders Johnson & Johnson to Pay $1.2M in Transvaginal Mesh Case 

“Over a seven-year period, Boston Scientific failed to warn doctors and their patients of the serious complications associated with the Obtryx sling, even though the company was aware of the product’s problems,” said Ms. Salazar’s attorney David Matthews, who tried the case alongside Dallas attorneys Tim Goss, Rich Capshaw and Kevin Edwards.

Ms. Salazar’s attorneys also presented evidence that showed the medical device maker had deliberately withheld from doctors a clinical study that proved serious complications resulted from the company’s mesh implant.

After nine days of testimony and one afternoon of deliberation, jurors found Boston Scientific’s Obtryx transvaginal sling caused (then) 38-year-old Martha Salazar permanent pain, a pronounced limp and the burden of 42 additional procedures, including four major surgeries, to treat complications associated with the mesh implant.

A former 20-year employee of a property management firm, Ms. Salazar can no longer sit comfortably, walk, or exercise without constant pain as a result of injuries caused by the plastic mesh, said Matthews.

“We asked the jurors to deliver a verdict that would change the way Boston Scientific does business,” he said. “The $50 million in punitive damages should get the company’s attention.”

Also working on the case were Sheila M. Bossier of Bossier & Associates in Jackson, MS, and Tim Goss, David Matthews and Richard Capshaw of Freese & Goss, PLLC, of Dallas.

Boston Scientific Corp. faces an additional 12,000 lawsuits in which other women claim the company’s transvaginal slings caused pain and tissue and organ damage, resulting in further surgeries to remove the plastic from their bodies.

Posted in Blog, Personal Injury, Product Liability

Comments are closed.

News Categories

Read about other Top Jury Verdicts

Salmon Purchasers Reach an $85 Million Price Fixing Settlement

Salmon Purchasers Reach an $85 Million Price Fixing Settlement

According to Reuters, who had seen the proposed settlement after it was filed on 25 May, the settlement will r[Read More...]
Ford Agrees to Pay $19 Million to Settle False Fuel Economy and Payload Claims

Ford Agrees to Pay $19 Million to Settle False Fuel Economy and Payload Claims

Ford Motor Company as agreed to a $19.2 million multistate settlement among 40 attorneys general that concluded an investigat[Read More...]
Total Settlement in Surfside Condo Collapse Tops $1 Billion

Total Settlement in Surfside Condo Collapse Tops $1 Billion

The proposed settlement reached nearly a year after the catastrophic Surfside building collapse along the South Flo[Read More...]
UCLA Will Pay Nearly $700 Million in Abuse Lawsuits

UCLA Will Pay Nearly $700 Million in Abuse Lawsuits

The University of California system announced Tuesday it will pay nearly $375 million to more than 300 women who said they we[Read More...]
Things to Consider When You Sue an Insurance Provider

Things to Consider When You Sue an Insurance Provider

We are all too acquainted with insurance coverage in our everyday lives. According to Investopedia, everyone should have[Read More...]

#LegalNews

@@TheNTLtop100

Contact Us | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

Attorney information and content provided on this website is provided for the benefit of members of The National Trial Lawyers and as a public service by Legal Associations Management, Inc. The website and all data are the property of Legal Associations Management, Inc. Data, including without limitation attorney information and content, on the site may not be mined, sold, or used commercially for any purpose without the explicit written consent of Legal Associations Management, Inc. This site may not be accessed by any automated program for extracting data for any use. By accessing and using the site you agree that you will not develop, support or use software, devices, scripts, robots, or any other means or processes (including crawlers, browser plug-ins and add-ons, or any other technology) to scrape data or otherwise copy profiles and other data. Unauthorized use or attempted unauthorized use of this system may subject you to both civil and criminal penalties.