The National Trial Lawyers
  • Home
    • Meet Our Team
    • Contact Us
    • Mission & Goals
    • FAQ
  • Webinars
  • News
  • Membership Directory
    • Top 100 Map – Civil Plaintiff
    • Top 100 Map – Criminal Defense
    • Top 40 Under 40 Map – Civil Plaintiff
    • Top 40 Under 40 Map – Criminal Defense
  • Top 100
    • Civil Plaintiff Officers / Executive Committee
    • Criminal Defense Officers / Executive Committee
    • Benefits
    • About
    • Top 100 President’s Message
    • Diplomat
    • Membership Renewal
    • Member Profile Updates
    • Top 100 Badge
    • Media
  • Top 40
    • Civil Plaintiff Officers / Executive Committee
    • Criminal Defense Officers / Executive Committee
    • Top 40 Under 40 Trial Academy Bootcamp
    • Benefits
    • About
    • Top 40 President’s Message
    • Membership Renewal
    • Member Profile Updates
    • Top 40 Badge
    • Media
  • Specialty Assoc
    • About
    • Shop
    • Officers
    • Membership Renewal
    • Member Profile Updates
    • Media
  • Nominate
    • Top 100
    • Top 40
    • Specialty Association
    • Trial Lawyer Hall of Fame
    • Trial Lawyer of the Year
    • Trial Team of the Year
    • America’s Most Influential Trial Lawyer
    • America’s Most Influential Law Firm
    • Lifetime Achievement Award
  • Shop
  • Magazine
    • A-List
  • Education and Networking Agenda
    • Trial Lawyers Summit
      • Summit Sponsors
    • Top 40 Under 40 Trial Academy Boot Camp
    • Mass Torts Made Perfect
    • The Lanier Master Class 5.0 Trial Academy 2021
    • Webinars
  • Hall of Fame
    • Trial Lawyer Hall of Fame

Judgment: Microsoft Liable for $2M for Retaliation Against Top Salesman

Posted on October 3, 2014 by Larry Bodine
Michael Mercieca Microsoft

The jury found that Mercieca (shown) was targeted after filing a discrimination complaint, as well as alerting senior management, including the company CEO at the time.

Capping a notorious employment discrimination case, the presiding judge issued a final judgment in a case where a jury found that Microsoft and key management had engaged in a vendetta against one of its top salesmen, Michael Mercieca, that led to his constructive discharge.

“Microsoft Corporation was found guilty in May 2014 by jury in a 12 to 0 decision. They remain guilty today, tomorrow and in perpetuity for egregious acts against me and racist comments by their executive that led to the retaliation and the vendetta resulting in my firing,” said Michael Mercieca.

Judge Tim Sulak (353rd District ) ruled in Michael Mercieca, plaintiff vs. Tracey Rummel, and Microsoft Corporation, Defendants, Case No. D-1-Gn-11-001030, In The District Court, 353rd Judicial District, Travis County, Texas.

Jurors originally awarded Mercieca more than $11 million against Microsoft, but Judge Sulak was forced to cut more than $9 million from the award under a state tort reform law that sets a $300,000 cap on compensatory and punitive damage awards.

Read our continuing coverage of this case:

Microsoft Hit with $11.6M Verdict for Wrongful Termination of Star Salesman

Final Petition in Mercieca v. Microsoft

Vendetta by Microsoft Leads to $11.6 Million Discrimination Verdict

The jury found that Mercieca was targeted after filing a discrimination complaint, as well as alerting senior management, including the company CEO at the time, Steve Ballmer, about “egregious sexist and racist comments” made in public and emails by Microsoft Vice President Eddie O’Brien.

The Microsoft executive made chilling remarks about the Japanese days after tsunami killed 20,000 people in 2011. “I would have zero pity for Japan; I would throw them right under the bus and create another tsunami if I  have to.” See depositions from court case at http://bit.ly/1xkTreo

According to the legal filings — see http://bit.ly/1 mzacqM — Microsoft did not fully investigate the incident, but chose to engage in a two-year long retaliation against Mercieca, in which he was given the most negative performance reviews he had ever received, although he had exceeded sales targets 11 consecutive quarters.

Microsoft managers lied

Microsoft managers lied about him to his clients, marginalized him within the company, intimidated him, defamed him, falsely charged him with sexual harassment and subsequently terminated his employment, according to plaintiff’s lawyer Attorney Paul T. Morin. Eddie Obrien, who allegedly made the racist comments, was subsequently promoted to a position with responsibility for emerging markets

“Rather than do the right thing, the management team went after Michael by getting a female employee to file a sexual harassment complaint and a complaint of retaliation against him. What could possibly be more cynical than to go after an employee trying to rid the workplace of discrimination by falsely making a claim of sexual harassment. Microsoft could have taken Mercieca’s charges seriously and disciplined the senior manager, but instead chose to engage in the worst kind of corporate bullying. The jury made the right decision and we are pleased the judge made a final judgment,” Morin said.

The court decreed that Mercieca shall be awarded:

  • $623,065.00 in back pay.
  • $77,840.20 in prejudgment interest on back pay accrued from April 2, 2012 through October 1, 2014.
  • $300,000.00 in compensatory and exemplary damages, per TEX. LAB. CODE § 21.2585.
  • $769,505.98 for legal services through rendition of judgment, calculated using the lodestar method.
  • $192,376.50 as an upward adjustment to the lodestar by a multiplier of 1.25.
  • $76,000.00 for legal services if this case is appealed to the Court of Appeals.
  • $7,500.00 for legal services if oral argument is held in the Court of Appeals.
  • $6,000.00 for legal services if a motion for rehearing/for en bane reconsideration is filed in the Court of Appeals.
  • $30,000.00 for legal services if a petition for review is filed with the Supreme Court of Texas.
  • $30,000.00 for legal services if the Supreme Court of Texas requests briefing on the merits.
  • $15,000.00 for legal services if oral argument is held in the Supreme Court of Texas.
  • $6,000.00 for legal services if the Supreme Court of Texas requests a response to any motion for rehearing.
  • $16,060.00 as reasonable expert fees.

 

Posted in Blog, Employment

Comments are closed.

Recent Posts

Pharmaceutical Giant Johnson & Johnson is Preparing $3.9B for Talc Settlements

Pharmaceutical Giant Johnson & Johnson is Preparing $3.9B for Talc Settlements

February 26th, 2021

Pharmaceutical giant Johnson & Johnson has set aside $3.9 billion for talc-related litigation, according to a regulatory [Read More...]
Alaska Airlines Will Pay $3.19M Following the Death of a Passenger

Alaska Airlines Will Pay $3.19M Following the Death of a Passenger

February 24th, 2021

Seattle-based Alaska Airlines has been ordered to pay more than $3 million to the family of a passenger of reduced mobility w[Read More...]
No thumbnail available

Keith Givens on the Trial Lawyers Summit and Lanier Trial Academy

February 23rd, 2021

https://vimeo.com/515910581 Michelle Swanner, Executive Director of The National Trial Lawyers, interviews Keith Givens[Read More...]
A $220M Settlement Reached in National Milk Producers' Herd Retirement Program

A $220M Settlement Reached in National Milk Producers' Herd Retirement Program

February 22nd, 2021

ST. LOUIS, Feb. 22, 2021 /PRNewswire/ -- A $220 million settlement has been reached in a class-action law[Read More...]
Mountaire Farms Proposes a $65M Settlement for Contaminating the Millsboro-Area Groundwater and Air

Mountaire Farms Proposes a $65M Settlement for Contaminating the Millsboro-Area Groundwater and Air

February 19th, 2021

It’s a lawsuit that’s been years in the making, but the class-action suit against Mountaire Farms may be approach[Read More...]

Contact Us | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

Attorney information and content provided on this website is provided for the benefit of members of The National Trial Lawyers and as a public service by Legal Associations Management, Inc. The website and all data are the property of Legal Associations Management, Inc. Data, including without limitation attorney information and content, on the site may not be mined, sold, or used commercially for any purpose without the explicit written consent of Legal Associations Management, Inc. This site may not be accessed by any automated program for extracting data for any use. By accessing and using the site you agree that you will not develop, support or use software, devices, scripts, robots, or any other means or processes (including crawlers, browser plug-ins and add-ons, or any other technology) to scrape data or otherwise copy profiles and other data. Unauthorized use or attempted unauthorized use of this system may subject you to both civil and criminal penalties.