The National Trial Lawyers
  • Home
    • Meet Our Team
    • Contact Us
    • Mission & Goals
    • FAQ
  • Webinars
  • News
  • Membership Directory
    • Top 100 Map – Civil Plaintiff
    • Top 100 Map – Criminal Defense
    • Top 40 Under 40 Map – Civil Plaintiff
    • Top 40 Under 40 Map – Criminal Defense
  • Top 100
    • Civil Plaintiff Officers / Executive Committee
    • Criminal Defense Officers / Executive Committee
    • Benefits
    • About
    • Top 100 President’s Message
    • Diplomat
    • Membership Renewal
    • Member Profile Updates
    • Top 100 Badge
    • Media
  • Top 40
    • Civil Plaintiff Officers / Executive Committee
    • Criminal Defense Officers / Executive Committee
    • Top 40 Under 40 Trial Academy Bootcamp
    • Benefits
    • About
    • Top 40 President’s Message
    • Membership Renewal
    • Member Profile Updates
    • Top 40 Badge
    • Media
  • Specialty Assoc
    • About
    • Shop
    • Officers
    • Membership Renewal
    • Member Profile Updates
    • Media
  • Nominate
    • Top 100
    • Top 40
    • Specialty Association
    • Trial Lawyer Hall of Fame
    • Trial Lawyer of the Year
    • Trial Team of the Year
    • America’s Most Influential Trial Lawyer
    • America’s Most Influential Law Firm
    • Lifetime Achievement Award
  • Shop
  • Magazine
    • A-List
  • Education and Networking Agenda
    • Trial Lawyers Summit
      • Summit Sponsors
    • Top 40 Under 40 Trial Academy Boot Camp
    • Mass Torts Made Perfect
    • The Lanier Master Class 5.0 Trial Academy 2021
    • Webinars
  • Hall of Fame
    • Trial Lawyer Hall of Fame

NY Strippers Awarded $10.8 Million in Back Wages

Posted on December 23, 2014 by Eleanor Smith
rick-enterance

The dancers claimed after paying club fees and required tips to deejays and other club workers, they sometimes ended up not making any money or even going negative.

A federal judge recently ruled that more than 1,900 female dancers at Rick’s Cabaret of New York, NY, are entitled to $10.8 million in back wages and tips after the dancers filed an employment law class action suit in 2009. The dancers, who worked at Rick’s Cabaret from 2005-2012, claimed they were entitled to be classified as employees rather than independent contractors, entitling them to minimum wage.

Rick’s Cabaret, located at 50 West 33rd Street, is one of only two adult entertainment companies to be publicly traded on NASDAQ. Additionally, Rick’s Cabaret has been named on a Forbes magazine list as one of the best 200 companies, and the strip club has been profiled in The Wall Street Journal, Fortune, MarketWatch, SmartMoney, The New York Daily News, and USA Today. Rick’s Cabaret was founded in 1983, and with locations all over the country, its website notes the late Anna Nicole Smith met her oil billionaire husband while dancing at its Houston location.

Extra fees and charges

Rick’s Cabaret has not only failing to pay its dancers, but holds a practice of requiring the dancers:

  • To pay a $60 fee per night to even dance for the employer
  • To pay a $60 per shift fee
  • To pay $2 out of $20 “Dance Dollar” customers bought with their credit cards to tip the dancers.

 

Rick’s Cabaret claims they believed this money was going directly to the dancers, according to the suit.

But that’s not all of the extra fees Rick’s Cabaret dancers are required to hand over to to work, all while receiving no wages. Dancers also must contribute a $20 from every lap dance or personal dance performed. Another performance fee required of the dancers at Rick’s includes a taking of $20 every time the dancer spends time in one the club’s semi-private rooms, a purchase which costs $100 for 15minutes, $200 for 30 minutes and $400 for one hour.

The dancers of Rick’s Cabaret claimed after paying club fees and required tips to deejays and other club workers, they sometimes ended up not making any money or even going negative. Their attorney has argued, “There is a real mythology of the wealthy stripper who has made piles of money. People see all the money the customers give to the dancers. What they don’t see is all the money going back from the entertainer to the club.”

Rick’s argued any wages the strip club would be required to pay its dancers should be offset by the tips given to dancers by customers. The 51-page ruling opinion disagreed, stating, “There is no charter under (state labor law) for an employer to treat a performance fee as either a ‘wage’ or as an offset to its statutory wage obligations.”

Getting only $14 out of $20

Manhattan Federal Court Judge Paul Englemayer took aim at the company’s “Dance Dollars” practice, finding, “a reasonable customer would have understood the performance fees which customers paid to dancers as gratuities belonging to the particular dancers, not as service charges belonging to the club.” The club, which charged the customers an additional service fee of $4, left the dancers only collecting approximately $14 out of the $20 customers believed them to be collecting.

After a finding the dancers are owed $10.8 million in damages for minimum wage violations and improperly retaining tips, RCI Hospitality, Rick’s Cabaret’s parent company, has said it is disappointed with the “flawed” decision. “The concept that the large sums of money earned by entertainers at Rick’s Cabaret New York, for which they received IRS Form 1099s, do not offset the claimed wage obligations is a fundamentally flawed concept,” RCI Hospitality Holdings said in a statement. There is currently no requirement for Rick’s Cabaret to pay the damages that resulted from Judge Englemayer’s decision last month because the case is still ongoing.

RCI Hospitality is also appealing, on behalf of Rick’s Cabaret, an earlier ruling by Judge Englemayer that found the dancers to be employees rather than independent contractors. It was after this determination the minimum wage and tip claims could be heard by the judge. In addition to the employee/independent contractor appeal, RCI Hospitality intends to appeal the wage violation decision once the upcoming trial has been heard.

At trial, Judge Englemayer will hear the complaint regarding the $60 per shift fee for the dancers to work, and another ruling in favor of these dancers could result in millions more for these employees. The November ruling covered claims the judge felt could be decided based on court documents alone, but the dancers are seeking over $18 million in damages total.

Posted in Blog, Class Actions, Employment

Comments are closed.

News Categories

Subscribe to Blog and VFJ via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog, the Voice for Justice and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Read about other Top Jury Verdicts

Toyota Will Pay $180M to Settle Violations of the Clean-Air Act

Toyota Will Pay $180M to Settle Violations of the Clean-Air Act

The U.S. Department of Justice and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) announced today that the United States has[Read More...]
Boeing's Insitu Will Pay $25M to Settle a Whistleblower Complaint About Used Drone Parts

Boeing's Insitu Will Pay $25M to Settle a Whistleblower Complaint About Used Drone Parts

Bingen, Wash.-based Insitu, a Boeing subsidiary, has agreed to pay $25 million to settle allegations that it used recycl[Read More...]
Deutsche Bank Agrees to Settle Criminal and Civil Charges for $130M

Deutsche Bank Agrees to Settle Criminal and Civil Charges for $130M

DEUTSCHE Bank AG agreed to pay US$130 million to settle criminal and civil charges that it bribed foreign officials and manip[Read More...]
Boeing Pays $2.5B to Settle Charges Tied to the 737 MAX Crashes

Boeing Pays $2.5B to Settle Charges Tied to the 737 MAX Crashes

Boeing has agreed to pay just over $2.5 billion to resolve a federal charge of “criminal misconduct” for how its [Read More...]
Texas Attorney General Seeks $43M in Google Antitrust Lawsuit

Texas Attorney General Seeks $43M in Google Antitrust Lawsuit

The mass exodus of Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton's top staff over accusations of bribery against their former boss has le[Read More...]

#LegalNews

@@TheNTLtop100

Contact Us | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

Attorney information and content provided on this website is provided for the benefit of members of The National Trial Lawyers and as a public service by Legal Associations Management, Inc. The website and all data are the property of Legal Associations Management, Inc. Data, including without limitation attorney information and content, on the site may not be mined, sold, or used commercially for any purpose without the explicit written consent of Legal Associations Management, Inc. This site may not be accessed by any automated program for extracting data for any use. By accessing and using the site you agree that you will not develop, support or use software, devices, scripts, robots, or any other means or processes (including crawlers, browser plug-ins and add-ons, or any other technology) to scrape data or otherwise copy profiles and other data. Unauthorized use or attempted unauthorized use of this system may subject you to both civil and criminal penalties.