The National Trial Lawyers
  • Home
    • Meet Our Team
    • Contact Us
    • Mission & Goals
    • FAQ
  • Webinars
  • News
  • Membership Directory
    • Top 100 Map – Civil Plaintiff
    • Top 100 Map – Criminal Defense
    • Top 40 Under 40 Map – Civil Plaintiff
    • Top 40 Under 40 Map – Criminal Defense
  • Top 100
    • Civil Plaintiff Officers / Executive Committee
    • Criminal Defense Officers / Executive Committee
    • Benefits
    • About
    • Top 100 Presidents Message
    • Diplomat
    • Membership Renewal
    • Member Profile Updates
    • Top 100 Badge
  • Top 40
    • Civil Plaintiff Officers / Executive Committee
    • Criminal Defense Officers / Executive Committee
    • Top 40 Under 40 Trial Academy Bootcamp
    • Benefits
    • About
    • Top 40 Presidents Message
    • Membership Renewal
    • Member Profile Updates
    • Top 40 Badge
  • Specialty Assoc
    • About
    • Shop
    • Officers
    • Membership Renewal
    • Member Profile Updates
  • Nominate
    • Top 100
    • Top 40
    • Specialty Association
    • Trial Lawyer Hall of Fame
    • Trial Lawyer of the Year
    • Trial Team of the Year
    • America’s Most Influential Trial Lawyer
    • America’s Most Influential Law Firm
    • Lifetime Achievement Award
  • Shop
  • Magazine
    • A-List
  • Education and Networking Agenda
    • Trial Lawyers Summit
    • Top 40 Under 40 Trial Academy Boot Camp
    • Mass Torts Made Perfect
    • The Lanier Trial Academy Master Class 6.0
    • The Business Of Law
    • Webinars
  • Hall of Fame
    • Trial Lawyer Hall of Fame

Ninth Circuit Remands ‘Jersey Boys’ Copyright Infringement Case

Posted on March 3, 2015 by Larry Bodine
Frankie valli

Frankie Valli performs his hits.

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals reversed a district court’s summary judgment ruling, stating that a question of fact remained whether former members of Four Seasons music group infringed upon a biographer’s copyright interest due to a reversionary clause in an agreement.

A reversionary clause is a provision generally used where the property owner reserves future ownership rights for himself or his heirs if a particular condition occurs.

The Jersey Boys is a successful Broadway musical and motion picture, depicting the rise and fall of the rock and roll group the Four Seasons, which had a series of hits from 1962 to 1967.

Musical grosses $489.7 million

The Jersey Boys movie, released in June 2014, grossed a worldwide total of $61.8 million in sales as of October 2014. The Broadway League reports the musical as of February 2015 has grossed $489.7 million since the October 2005 release.

Donna Corbello, is the wife of late Rex Woodard. In 1988, Rex Woodard received a written agreement to ghostwrite the autobiography of Thomas Devito, a member of Four Seasons.

The biography was not officially published at the time of Rex’s death in 1991.

In 1999, Thomas Devito and Nicholas Macioci granted Frankie Valli and Bob Gaudio, the exclusive right to use “aspects of [their lives] related to The Four Seasons including, by way of example, [their] creative contributions, biographies, events in [their lives], names and likenesses to develop a musical stage performance about the “Four Seasons.”

The play did not generate any interest until 2004, when Dodger Theatricals, Inc. agreed to produce the work.

At this time, Valli and Gaudio entered into a separate agreement with Dodger granting the right to use the band name, music and band members’ life stories and names.

Corbello contends as the sole heir and copyright holder she should receive a share of the profits because the musical is a derivative work of the autobiography written by her late husband.

The band members and other defendants contend that the 1999 agreement referred to general life stories rather than documented life histories. Thus, were not subject to a transfer of ownership interest.

Corbello’s Discovery

Corbello attempted to republish the biography and regenerate interest in the band in 2005, when the Jersey Boys musical was set to premiere on Broadway.

The following year, she discovered Thomas Devito previously registered, solely in his name, a writing identical to her husband’s. Subsequently, Corbello filed an application to add Woodard as the co-author and co-claimant.

On appeal, the defendants argued that Devito was prohibited from transferring that right without permission from his co-owner Corbello.

The defendants relied on Sybersound Records v. UAV Corp., a copyright infringement case. 517 F.3d 1137 (9th Cir. 1998) (The Ninth Circuit concluded only rights that exist under copyright law are those granted by statute.)

The Ninth Circuit Court clarified that a joint owner is unable to transfer more than he holds and if the co-owner transfers their rights, [Valli & Guadio] only have exclusive rights to the extent of the assigning co-owner.

The court ultimately decided that DeVito transferred an ownership interest to the his former band mates but Valli and Gaudio’s rights may have terminated prior to the production of the musical.

When DeVito, Valli and Gaudio executed the agreement, the members had ownership rights to DeVito’s name, biographies and aspects of his life to produce the play.

Reversionary clause

However, the reversionary clause in the 1999 agreement provided the co-owners rights would continue if the initial production contract failed and a second production contract was executed within two years of the initial producer’s rights expiring.

The initial producer’s rights expired in December 2002. Valli and Gaudio reached the second production deal with Dodger Theatricals in May 2004 and the production took place in 2005.

If the second production contract was not fully executed before December 2004, Valli, Gaudio, and others involved rights to DeVito’s material may have expired and infringed on Corbello’s copyright interest.

The case has been remanded to the lower court to decide whether Valli and Gaudio’s rights did in fact expire due to the reversionary clause.

The case is Donna Corbello v. Devito, et al., Case No. 13-15826, United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Gregory H. Guillot, Gregory H. Guillot, P.C. Dallas, TX argued the cause for the plaintiff-appellant.

Daniel M. Mayeda, Leopold, Pietrich & Smith. P.C., Los Angeles, CA, argued on behalf of the defendants-appellees.

Posted in Blog, Business Law

Comments are closed.

News Categories

Read about other Top Jury Verdicts

Virginians Will Receive $489 Million in a Payday Loan Settlement

Virginians Will Receive $489 Million in a Payday Loan Settlement

Online payday loan companies that charged as much as 919% interest will spend $489 million to reimburse some 555,000 borrower[Read More...]
The State of Minnesota Will Pay $1.5 Million to a Man Who Alleged Excessive Force During an Arrest

The State of Minnesota Will Pay $1.5 Million to a Man Who Alleged Excessive Force During an Arrest

Minneapolis has agreed to pay $1.5 million to a man who said police used excessive force when he was arrested during the prot[Read More...]
A $230 Million Settlement Is Reached Over a 2015 Southern California Oil Spill

A $230 Million Settlement Is Reached Over a 2015 Southern California Oil Spill

The owner of an oil pipeline that spewed thousands of barrels of crude oil onto Southern California beaches in 2015 has agree[Read More...]
The LeClairRyan-UnitedLex Dispute Reaches a Pending $21 Million Settlement

The LeClairRyan-UnitedLex Dispute Reaches a Pending $21 Million Settlement

After a prolonged mediation process, the LeClairRyan bankruptcy estate looks to have reached a sizable settlement in one of t[Read More...]
The Families of Holyoke Soldiers Home Victims Reach a $56 Million Settlement

The Families of Holyoke Soldiers Home Victims Reach a $56 Million Settlement

Massachusetts has agreed to pay $56 million to settle a class-action lawsuit brought by the families of veterans who died or [Read More...]

#LegalNews

@@TheNTLtop100

Contact Us | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

Attorney information and content provided on this website is provided for the benefit of members of The National Trial Lawyers and as a public service by Legal Associations Management, Inc. The website and all data are the property of Legal Associations Management, Inc. Data, including without limitation attorney information and content, on the site may not be mined, sold, or used commercially for any purpose without the explicit written consent of Legal Associations Management, Inc. This site may not be accessed by any automated program for extracting data for any use. By accessing and using the site you agree that you will not develop, support or use software, devices, scripts, robots, or any other means or processes (including crawlers, browser plug-ins and add-ons, or any other technology) to scrape data or otherwise copy profiles and other data. Unauthorized use or attempted unauthorized use of this system may subject you to both civil and criminal penalties.