The National Trial Lawyers
  • Home
    • Meet Our Team
    • Contact Us
    • Mission & Goals
    • FAQ
  • Webinars
  • News
  • Membership Directory
    • Top 100 Map – Civil Plaintiff
    • Top 100 Map – Criminal Defense
    • Top 40 Under 40 Map – Civil Plaintiff
    • Top 40 Under 40 Map – Criminal Defense
  • Top 100
    • Civil Plaintiff Officers / Executive Committee
    • Criminal Defense Officers / Executive Committee
    • Benefits
    • About
    • Top 100 President’s Message
    • Diplomat
    • Membership Renewal
    • Member Profile Updates
    • Top 100 Badge
    • Media
  • Top 40
    • Civil Plaintiff Officers / Executive Committee
    • Criminal Defense Officers / Executive Committee
    • Top 40 Under 40 Trial Academy Bootcamp
    • Benefits
    • About
    • Top 40 President’s Message
    • Membership Renewal
    • Member Profile Updates
    • Top 40 Badge
    • Media
  • Specialty Assoc
    • About
    • Shop
    • Officers
    • Membership Renewal
    • Member Profile Updates
    • Media
  • Nominate
    • Top 100
    • Top 40
    • Specialty Association
    • Trial Lawyer Hall of Fame
    • Trial Lawyer of the Year
    • Trial Team of the Year
    • America’s Most Influential Trial Lawyer
    • America’s Most Influential Law Firm
    • Lifetime Achievement Award
  • Shop
  • Magazine
    • A-List
  • Education and Networking Agenda
    • Trial Lawyers Summit
      • Summit Sponsors
    • Top 40 Under 40 Trial Academy Boot Camp
    • Mass Torts Made Perfect
    • The Lanier Master Class 5.0 Trial Academy 2021
    • Webinars
  • Hall of Fame
    • Trial Lawyer Hall of Fame

NC State Bar: Social Media Usage by Judges OK

Posted on April 10, 2015 by Larry Bodine
Twitter and the law

2014 Formal Ethics Opinion 8 rules that a lawyer may accept an invitation from a judge to be a “connection” on a professional networking website, and may endorse a judge.

Your next social media invite may be from your local  judge, at least in North Carolina. Judges and lawyers in North Carolina may now interact on commonly used social networking sites such as Facebook and Twitter, according to a new North Carolina State Bar ethics opinion.

The Bar’s ethics opinion focused on lawyers and judges maintaining their ethical responsibilities while connecting with one another on LinkedIn.

LinkedIn is the professional social networking site, where users make connections with one another in their current or desired field. These contacts may also endorse or  recommend “skills & expertise” for members.

Ethical Guidelines

In this opinion, endorsements are not limited to professional skills — personal skills are also applicable.

Attorneys must be aware that judges may not engage in ex parte communication regarding issues the judge may be considering. These actions are prohibited by traditional rules of ethics.

  • The opinion also states that an attorney may endorse the judges’ skills or expertise but may not accept an endorsement from a judge, to avoid creating an appearance of judicial partiality.
  • If an attorney wishes to submit or receives an invitation from a local judge he must reject any request until proceedings are completed.

 

While interacting attorneys must:

  • Avoid conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice;
  • Not state or imply an ability to influence improperly a government agency or official;
  • Avoid ex parte communications with a judge regarding legal matters.

 

Many Judicial Officials Use Social Media

While many lawyers and law firms use social media as a marketing and employment tool, a summary from the UNC School of Government states as of 2012, 46.1% of judges maintained a social media profile. Facebook was the most popular among the judges surveyed.

Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram are often used as a personal outlet for friends and co-workers alike. Legal professionals are allowed to interact with one another outside of the office.

In fact, the Bar’s opinion states “Interactions with judges using social media are elevated in the same manner, as personal interactions with a judge, such as an invitation to dinner.”

It is not all surprising the Bar issued an opinion clearing up the controversy with legal professionals using social media. North Carolina follows suit with states such as South Carolina, New York and Florida — all of which have issued  similar ethics decisions.

This opinion helps establish guidelines and prevent incidents such as one in 2009 where an Iredell County judge was reprimanded for speaking with an attorney over social media about a pending legal matter.

Everyone will not agree with the changes and may believe the legal profession continues to lose its traditional norms. But, could one imagine hitting the “like” button on a judge’s selfie, after all everyone has time for a quick photo, right?

Read the formal ethics opinion here.

Posted in Blog, Trial Practice

Comments are closed.

News Categories

Subscribe to Blog and VFJ via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog, the Voice for Justice and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Read about other Top Jury Verdicts

Toyota Will Pay $180M to Settle Violations of the Clean-Air Act

Toyota Will Pay $180M to Settle Violations of the Clean-Air Act

The U.S. Department of Justice and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) announced today that the United States has[Read More...]
Boeing's Insitu Will Pay $25M to Settle a Whistleblower Complaint About Used Drone Parts

Boeing's Insitu Will Pay $25M to Settle a Whistleblower Complaint About Used Drone Parts

Bingen, Wash.-based Insitu, a Boeing subsidiary, has agreed to pay $25 million to settle allegations that it used recycl[Read More...]
Deutsche Bank Agrees to Settle Criminal and Civil Charges for $130M

Deutsche Bank Agrees to Settle Criminal and Civil Charges for $130M

DEUTSCHE Bank AG agreed to pay US$130 million to settle criminal and civil charges that it bribed foreign officials and manip[Read More...]
Boeing Pays $2.5B to Settle Charges Tied to the 737 MAX Crashes

Boeing Pays $2.5B to Settle Charges Tied to the 737 MAX Crashes

Boeing has agreed to pay just over $2.5 billion to resolve a federal charge of “criminal misconduct” for how its [Read More...]
Texas Attorney General Seeks $43M in Google Antitrust Lawsuit

Texas Attorney General Seeks $43M in Google Antitrust Lawsuit

The mass exodus of Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton's top staff over accusations of bribery against their former boss has le[Read More...]

#LegalNews

@@TheNTLtop100

Contact Us | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

Attorney information and content provided on this website is provided for the benefit of members of The National Trial Lawyers and as a public service by Legal Associations Management, Inc. The website and all data are the property of Legal Associations Management, Inc. Data, including without limitation attorney information and content, on the site may not be mined, sold, or used commercially for any purpose without the explicit written consent of Legal Associations Management, Inc. This site may not be accessed by any automated program for extracting data for any use. By accessing and using the site you agree that you will not develop, support or use software, devices, scripts, robots, or any other means or processes (including crawlers, browser plug-ins and add-ons, or any other technology) to scrape data or otherwise copy profiles and other data. Unauthorized use or attempted unauthorized use of this system may subject you to both civil and criminal penalties.