The National Trial Lawyers
  • Home
    • Meet Our Team
    • Contact Us
    • Mission & Goals
    • FAQ
  • Webinars
  • News
  • Membership Directory
    • Top 100 Map – Civil Plaintiff
    • Top 100 Map – Criminal Defense
    • Top 40 Under 40 Map – Civil Plaintiff
    • Top 40 Under 40 Map – Criminal Defense
  • Top 100
    • Civil Plaintiff Officers / Executive Committee
    • Criminal Defense Officers / Executive Committee
    • Benefits
    • About
    • Top 100 President’s Message
    • Diplomat
    • Membership Renewal
    • Member Profile Updates
    • Top 100 Badge
    • Media
  • Top 40
    • Civil Plaintiff Officers / Executive Committee
    • Criminal Defense Officers / Executive Committee
    • Top 40 Under 40 Trial Academy Bootcamp
    • Benefits
    • About
    • Top 40 President’s Message
    • Membership Renewal
    • Member Profile Updates
    • Top 40 Badge
    • Media
  • Specialty Assoc
    • About
    • Shop
    • Officers
    • Membership Renewal
    • Member Profile Updates
    • Media
  • Nominate
    • Top 100
    • Top 40
    • Specialty Association
    • Trial Lawyer Hall of Fame
    • Trial Lawyer of the Year
    • Trial Team of the Year
    • America’s Most Influential Trial Lawyer
    • America’s Most Influential Law Firm
    • Lifetime Achievement Award
  • Shop
  • Magazine
    • A-List
  • Education and Networking Agenda
    • Trial Lawyers Summit
      • Summit Sponsors
    • Top 40 Under 40 Trial Academy Boot Camp
    • Mass Torts Made Perfect
    • The Lanier Master Class 5.0 Trial Academy 2021
    • Webinars
  • Hall of Fame
    • Trial Lawyer Hall of Fame

$6 Million Forfeiture Stands Against Debt Collector Masquerading as Legal Support Firm

Posted on May 7, 2015 by Larry Bodine

Appeals Court Upholds $6 Million Order Against Debt Settlement CompanyA Wisconsin Court of Appeals has upheld an order requiring a debt settlement company to return more than $6.1 million dollars in fees and forfeitures for operating a scam in violation of Wisconsin’s consumer protection laws.

Morgan Drexen provides nationwide fee-based services by negotiating debt settlements with creditors on behalf of debtors.  Wisconsin consumers paid more than $8.1 million from 2007 to 2012 toward its debt settlement services, but only $3.8 million was actually paid to creditors. The remaining $4.25 million was taken by Morgan Drexen as fees for its service, according to court documents.

The company counsels debtors to stop paying creditors and instead make monthly payments to an account controlled by Morgan Drexen, from which it first takes its service fees.  As part of the rip-off, Morgan Drexen would not begin to negotiate settlements until the debtor’s monthly payments had accumulated to an amount large enough to settle a defaulted account.

A pretense to evade regulation

The Wisconsin Department of Financial Institutions (DFI) filed a complaint against Morgan Drexen in 2011 alleging it violated Wisconsin law that requires adjustment service companies to obtain a license, file disclosures with DFI, and comply with limited fee requirements that can be charged to debtors.

Morgan Drexen asserted that it did not need a license to operate because it is a “paralegal and administrative support firm that works for attorneys,” not a debt settlement company.

“Morgan Drexen’s attorney model is, both in execution and intention, a pretense designed to evade regulation,” said the administrative law judge who ordered the original repayment at a 2013 hearing.  The order was appealed by Morgan Drexen, but affirmed by a Wisconsin circuit court and now, the Wisconsin court of appeals.

Morgan Drexen claimed that the hearing examiner erred in its interpretation of the state law definition of an adjustment service company.  The court of appeals admitted that the disputed statute, Wis. Stat. § 218.02, is “not a model of clarity.”  However, it rejected Morgan Drexen’s argument, and relied on the legislative statutory intent, which was to “protect debtors from oppressive or deceptive practices” and to “prevent evasion of this [statute] section,” according to court documents.

Fraudulent, abusive and deceptive practices

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFBP) warns that dealing with debt settlement companies can be risky.  Companies often charge expensive fees and encourage debtors to stop paying their bills, which can increase late fees, negative credit ratings and collection efforts by creditors, often leaving debtors deeper in debt than when they started.

The United States Government Accountability Office (GAO) called these practices “fraudulent, abusive, and deceptive” in a 2010 investigation report on debt settlement companies.   The report indicated that less than 10 percent of debtors successfully complete the programs although many companies claimed unusually high success rates from 85 percent up to 100 percent.  Unfortunately many debtors, after fees and late charges, end up with a settlement balance much higher than what they originally owed.

Operations Cease in Wisconsin

Morgan Drexen’s website lists other legal support services claims to offer, and its performance benchmarks include supporting attorneys in settling more than $360 million in debt for more than 5,000 consumers nationwide and most material references the debt settlement operations.  It also posts a current list debt resolution settlement letters, showing, for example, a settlement for an original balance of $950 with a current balance of $1,807.60, which settled for $813.42.

In its open letter to America’s legal professionals, Morgan Drexen claims that the “affordable legal care” that it provides is “under fire” by the CFPB, who is trying to eliminate companies like it.  Morgan Drexen’s operations have been eliminated from Wisconsin since the Court of Appeal also upheld an order for Morgan Drexen to cease operations in Wisconsin as a result of its unlicensed operation and collecting paid fees that it “was not legally entitled to collect,” according to the court.

 

Posted in Blog, Business Law, Consumer Protection

Comments are closed.

News Categories

Subscribe to Blog and VFJ via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog, the Voice for Justice and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Read about other Top Jury Verdicts

Toyota Will Pay $180M to Settle Violations of the Clean-Air Act

Toyota Will Pay $180M to Settle Violations of the Clean-Air Act

The U.S. Department of Justice and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) announced today that the United States has[Read More...]
Boeing's Insitu Will Pay $25M to Settle a Whistleblower Complaint About Used Drone Parts

Boeing's Insitu Will Pay $25M to Settle a Whistleblower Complaint About Used Drone Parts

Bingen, Wash.-based Insitu, a Boeing subsidiary, has agreed to pay $25 million to settle allegations that it used recycl[Read More...]
Deutsche Bank Agrees to Settle Criminal and Civil Charges for $130M

Deutsche Bank Agrees to Settle Criminal and Civil Charges for $130M

DEUTSCHE Bank AG agreed to pay US$130 million to settle criminal and civil charges that it bribed foreign officials and manip[Read More...]
Boeing Pays $2.5B to Settle Charges Tied to the 737 MAX Crashes

Boeing Pays $2.5B to Settle Charges Tied to the 737 MAX Crashes

Boeing has agreed to pay just over $2.5 billion to resolve a federal charge of “criminal misconduct” for how its [Read More...]
Texas Attorney General Seeks $43M in Google Antitrust Lawsuit

Texas Attorney General Seeks $43M in Google Antitrust Lawsuit

The mass exodus of Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton's top staff over accusations of bribery against their former boss has le[Read More...]

#LegalNews

@@TheNTLtop100

Contact Us | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

Attorney information and content provided on this website is provided for the benefit of members of The National Trial Lawyers and as a public service by Legal Associations Management, Inc. The website and all data are the property of Legal Associations Management, Inc. Data, including without limitation attorney information and content, on the site may not be mined, sold, or used commercially for any purpose without the explicit written consent of Legal Associations Management, Inc. This site may not be accessed by any automated program for extracting data for any use. By accessing and using the site you agree that you will not develop, support or use software, devices, scripts, robots, or any other means or processes (including crawlers, browser plug-ins and add-ons, or any other technology) to scrape data or otherwise copy profiles and other data. Unauthorized use or attempted unauthorized use of this system may subject you to both civil and criminal penalties.