The National Trial Lawyers
  • Home
    • Meet Our Team
    • Contact Us
    • Mission & Goals
    • FAQ
  • Webinars
  • News
  • Membership Directory
    • Top 100 Map – Civil Plaintiff
    • Top 100 Map – Criminal Defense
    • Top 40 Under 40 Map – Civil Plaintiff
    • Top 40 Under 40 Map – Criminal Defense
  • Top 100
    • Civil Plaintiff Officers / Executive Committee
    • Criminal Defense Officers / Executive Committee
    • Benefits
    • About
    • Top 100 Presidents Message
    • Diplomat
    • Membership Renewal
    • Member Profile Updates
    • Top 100 Badge
  • Top 40
    • Civil Plaintiff Officers / Executive Committee
    • Criminal Defense Officers / Executive Committee
    • Top 40 Under 40 Trial Academy Bootcamp
    • Benefits
    • About
    • Top 40 Presidents Message
    • Membership Renewal
    • Member Profile Updates
    • Top 40 Badge
  • Specialty Assoc
    • About
    • Shop
    • Officers
    • Membership Renewal
    • Member Profile Updates
  • Nominate
    • Top 100
    • Top 40
    • Specialty Association
    • Trial Lawyer Hall of Fame
    • Trial Lawyer of the Year
    • Trial Team of the Year
    • America’s Most Influential Trial Lawyer
    • America’s Most Influential Law Firm
    • Lifetime Achievement Award
  • Shop
  • Magazine
    • A-List
  • Education and Networking Agenda
    • Trial Lawyers Summit
    • Top 40 Under 40 Trial Academy Boot Camp
    • Mass Torts Made Perfect
    • The Lanier Trial Academy Master Class 6.0
    • The Business Of Law
    • Webinars
  • Hall of Fame
    • Trial Lawyer Hall of Fame

Mississippi Law Firm Wins Right to Run Ads Targeting Nursing Home

Posted on June 2, 2015 by Eleanor Smith

imgres-13

The Georgia Supreme Court has vacated an injunction that restrained a Mississippi law firm from advertising about deficiencies at a Stephens County, Georgia, nursing home in an attempt to solicit clients.

The court ruled that the trial court erred in halitng the advertising by McHugh Fuller Law Group of Hattiesburg. PruittHealth had filed a complaint for injunctive relief under the Georgia Uniform Deceptive Trade Practices Act (UDTPA) and petitioned for a temporary restraining order after McHugh Fuller ran a full-page advertisement in a Northeast Georgia local newspaper, the Toccoa Record.

Deficiencies in care

The firm’s ad, published on April 17, 2014, discussed that Heritage Healthcare, owned by PruittHealth, had been cited by the government for “deficiencies” in the care of residents, simultaneously inviting those suspecting abuse or neglect of a loved one at the facility to call McHugh Fuller. PruittHealth argued the government citation referenced in the firm’s advertisement related to an outdated 2012 survey report, and that a more recent report had found the deficiencies had been resolved. Agreeing, the trial court entered a temporary restraining order against McHugh Fuller the same day the PruittHealth complaint was filed.

McHugh Fuller counter-argued by presenting testimony from an Emory University law school ethics professor, who testified the ad was neither false nor deceptive. Despite the evidence presented by the firm, the trial court concluded the ad was deceptive and therefore violative of the UDTPA.

When McHugh Fuller appealed, the firm specifically requested that the clerk “omit nothing from the record, while PruittHealth asked the court only to include the items submitted through the injunction date, excluding the verified answer, motions and supporting exhibits the firm had filed with the trial court after that date.

The trial court determined the record should include only the materials before the court at the time of the final order, which was issued on the same day as the complaint was filed. Disagreeing, Justice Carol Hunstein, writing for the Georgia Supreme Court, said:

“Here, while McHugh Fuller clearly had notice of the interlocutory hearing, it had no notice that the trial court intended at that hearing to consider the merits of permanent injunctive relief. Our Appellate Practice Act requires the appellant to specify in the notice of appeal ‘those portions of the record to be omitted from the record on appeal.’ Thus, it is the appellant that is charged with the duty to designate the appellate record. Once such designation has been made, the appellee is permitted to designate for inclusion any materials the appellant has requested be omitted.”

Aside from the advertisement controversy, McHugh Fuller, which also has a location in Charleston, West Virginia, was surrounded by a heated public contention in 2011, when ABC News reported that partner Michael Fuller purchased a Learjet from Segal Law Firm of Charleston. The Segal Firm, which received more than $1 million for the business aircraft, is owned by West Virginia Supreme Court Justice Robin Davis’ husband, Scott Segal. Interestingly, one of McHugh Fuller’s 2014 clients received a $40 million jury verdict, which was upheld by Davis, who wrote the majority opinion.

The Georgia Supreme Court opinion can be found here. The case is McHugh Fuller Law Group, PLLC v. PruittHealth-Toccoa, LLC.

Posted in Blog, Business Law, Marketing

Comments are closed.

News Categories

Read about other Top Jury Verdicts

No thumbnail available

Things to Consider When You Sue an Insurance Provider

We are all too acquainted with insurance coverage in our everyday lives. According to Investopedia, everyone should have[Read More...]
The Rochester Diocese Offers a $147 Million Settlement to Sex Abuse Survivors

The Rochester Diocese Offers a $147 Million Settlement to Sex Abuse Survivors

The Rochester Catholic Diocese is offering a $147 million settlement to sex abuse survivors. This offer comes as a federal ba[Read More...]
Jury Awards $77.5 Million to an Army Veteran in a 3M Earplug Case

Jury Awards $77.5 Million to an Army Veteran in a 3M Earplug Case

A jury in Pensacola, Fla., federal court on Friday ordered 3M to pay $77.5 million to a U.S. Army veteran who said he suffe[Read More...]
The New Mexico Supreme Court Upholds $165 Million Damage Awards in a Deadly FedEx Crash

The New Mexico Supreme Court Upholds $165 Million Damage Awards in a Deadly FedEx Crash

The New Mexico Supreme Court on Thursday upheld $165 million of jury awards against FedEx in a wrongful-death lawsuit stemmin[Read More...]
Noom Reaches a $56 Million Class Action Settlement Over Its Autorenewal and Cancellation Policy

Noom Reaches a $56 Million Class Action Settlement Over Its Autorenewal and Cancellation Policy

Weight-loss program Noom has agreed to a $56 million settlement to resolve class action claims regarding its autorenewal and [Read More...]

#LegalNews

@@TheNTLtop100

Contact Us | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

Attorney information and content provided on this website is provided for the benefit of members of The National Trial Lawyers and as a public service by Legal Associations Management, Inc. The website and all data are the property of Legal Associations Management, Inc. Data, including without limitation attorney information and content, on the site may not be mined, sold, or used commercially for any purpose without the explicit written consent of Legal Associations Management, Inc. This site may not be accessed by any automated program for extracting data for any use. By accessing and using the site you agree that you will not develop, support or use software, devices, scripts, robots, or any other means or processes (including crawlers, browser plug-ins and add-ons, or any other technology) to scrape data or otherwise copy profiles and other data. Unauthorized use or attempted unauthorized use of this system may subject you to both civil and criminal penalties.