The National Trial Lawyers
  • Home
    • Meet Our Team
    • Contact Us
    • Mission & Goals
    • FAQ
  • Webinars
  • News
  • Membership Directory
    • Top 100 Map – Civil Plaintiff
    • Top 100 Map – Criminal Defense
    • Top 40 Under 40 Map – Civil Plaintiff
    • Top 40 Under 40 Map – Criminal Defense
  • Top 100
    • Civil Plaintiff Officers / Executive Committee
    • Criminal Defense Officers / Executive Committee
    • Benefits
    • About
    • Top 100 Presidents Message
    • Diplomat
    • Membership Renewal
    • Member Profile Updates
    • Top 100 Badge
  • Top 40
    • Civil Plaintiff Officers / Executive Committee
    • Criminal Defense Officers / Executive Committee
    • Top 40 Under 40 Trial Academy Bootcamp
    • Benefits
    • About
    • Top 40 Presidents Message
    • Membership Renewal
    • Member Profile Updates
    • Top 40 Badge
  • Specialty Assoc
    • About
    • Shop
    • Officers
    • Membership Renewal
    • Member Profile Updates
  • Nominate
    • Top 100
    • Top 40
    • Specialty Association
    • Trial Lawyer Hall of Fame
    • Trial Lawyer of the Year
    • Trial Team of the Year
    • America’s Most Influential Trial Lawyer
    • America’s Most Influential Law Firm
    • Lifetime Achievement Award
  • Shop
  • Magazine
    • A-List
  • Education and Networking Agenda
    • Trial Lawyers Summit
    • Top 40 Under 40 Trial Academy Boot Camp
    • Mass Torts Made Perfect
    • The Lanier Trial Academy Master Class 6.0
    • The Business Of Law
    • Webinars
  • Hall of Fame
    • Trial Lawyer Hall of Fame

No Retroactive Tort Reform in Florida Medical Malpractice Suit

Posted on June 8, 2015 by Larry Bodine

medical malpractice, american association for justice

The Florida Supreme Court ruled that a plaintiff’s recovery should not be capped by a state tort reform statute enacted after the malpractice incident.

The court stated that retroactively applying the statute would have been unfair to the plaintiff.

Plaintiffs Kimberly Ann Miles and her husband Jody Haynes filed suit against surgeon, Dr. Daniel Weingrad after Miles suffered severe complications from an unnecessary cancer surgery.

A Flawed Second Opinion

Miles was diagnosed with melanoma and underwent surgery to remove a cancerous tumor from her leg. She was told the tumor was completely removed and no cancer remained.

To be certain, Miles sought a second opinion from Dr. Weingrad. He convinced Miles it was necessary to have an emergency second surgery because “they didn’t get it all.” The surgery was performed in January 2003. Postoperative surgery results showed no melanoma existed prior to the second surgery.

See: Healthcare Network Liable for $1.6M for Overdosing Patient

The second surgery resulted in an infection, four day hospitalization, ongoing pain and permanent swelling in her leg. Additionally, the plaintiff can no longer sit or stand for long periods, nor can she exercise.

The plaintiffs were awarded $1.45 million in economic damages and $16,104 in economic damages. Jody Haynes was awarded $50,000 for his loss of consortium claim.

The defendants appealed the jury award, stating the damages should be reduced to $500,000 due to the recent legislation, which imposed a damage cap on medical malpractice awards. The law was enacted in September 2003.

Retroactively Applying the Statute is Unfair

Determining whether a statute may be applied retroactively requires consideration of whether the statute expresses the intent for retrospective application and if so, whether the retroactive application is constitutional.

Applying this standard, the court found a cause of action in medical malpractice accrues at the time the incident occurs. The legislative action became effective in September, seven months after the plaintiff’s cause of action accrued.

Additionally, a retroactive application of the statute would have infringed on the plaintiffs vested and substantive rights.

The court ruled against Dr. Weingrad, quashing the previous court’s decision and remanded the case to the lower court to reinstate the original jury award.

This case is Kimberly Ann Miles, et. al v. Daniel Weingrad, M.D. Case No. SC13-54, Supreme Court of Florida

Counsel for the plaintiffs were Robert Glazier, Law Office of Robert S. Glazier, Miami Florida, Alejandro Alvarez, Alvarez Law Firm, and Philip Mead Burlington of Burlington & Rockenbach

 

Posted in Blog, Medical Malpractice

Comments are closed.

News Categories

Read about other Top Jury Verdicts

Total Settlement in Surfside Condo Collapse Tops $1 Billion

Total Settlement in Surfside Condo Collapse Tops $1 Billion

The proposed settlement reached nearly a year after the catastrophic Surfside building collapse along the South Flo[Read More...]
UCLA Will Pay Nearly $700 Million in Abuse Lawsuits

UCLA Will Pay Nearly $700 Million in Abuse Lawsuits

The University of California system announced Tuesday it will pay nearly $375 million to more than 300 women who said they we[Read More...]
Things to Consider When You Sue an Insurance Provider

Things to Consider When You Sue an Insurance Provider

We are all too acquainted with insurance coverage in our everyday lives. According to Investopedia, everyone should have[Read More...]
The Rochester Diocese Offers a $147 Million Settlement to Sex Abuse Survivors

The Rochester Diocese Offers a $147 Million Settlement to Sex Abuse Survivors

The Rochester Catholic Diocese is offering a $147 million settlement to sex abuse survivors. This offer comes as a federal ba[Read More...]
Jury Awards $77.5 Million to an Army Veteran in a 3M Earplug Case

Jury Awards $77.5 Million to an Army Veteran in a 3M Earplug Case

A jury in Pensacola, Fla., federal court on Friday ordered 3M to pay $77.5 million to a U.S. Army veteran who said he suffe[Read More...]

#LegalNews

@@TheNTLtop100

Contact Us | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

Attorney information and content provided on this website is provided for the benefit of members of The National Trial Lawyers and as a public service by Legal Associations Management, Inc. The website and all data are the property of Legal Associations Management, Inc. Data, including without limitation attorney information and content, on the site may not be mined, sold, or used commercially for any purpose without the explicit written consent of Legal Associations Management, Inc. This site may not be accessed by any automated program for extracting data for any use. By accessing and using the site you agree that you will not develop, support or use software, devices, scripts, robots, or any other means or processes (including crawlers, browser plug-ins and add-ons, or any other technology) to scrape data or otherwise copy profiles and other data. Unauthorized use or attempted unauthorized use of this system may subject you to both civil and criminal penalties.