The National Trial Lawyers
  • Home
    • Meet Our Team
    • Contact Us
    • Mission & Goals
    • FAQ
  • Webinars
  • News
  • Membership Directory
    • Top 100 Map – Civil Plaintiff
    • Top 100 Map – Criminal Defense
    • Top 40 Under 40 Map – Civil Plaintiff
    • Top 40 Under 40 Map – Criminal Defense
  • Top 100
    • Civil Plaintiff Officers / Executive Committee
    • Criminal Defense Officers / Executive Committee
    • Benefits
    • About
    • Top 100 Presidents Message
    • Diplomat
    • Membership Renewal
    • Member Profile Updates
    • Top 100 Badge
  • Top 40
    • Civil Plaintiff Officers / Executive Committee
    • Criminal Defense Officers / Executive Committee
    • Top 40 Under 40 Trial Academy Bootcamp
    • Benefits
    • About
    • Top 40 Presidents Message
    • Membership Renewal
    • Member Profile Updates
    • Top 40 Badge
  • Specialty Assoc
    • About
    • Shop
    • Officers
    • Membership Renewal
    • Member Profile Updates
  • Nominate
    • Top 100
    • Top 40
    • Specialty Association
    • Trial Lawyer Hall of Fame
    • Trial Lawyer of the Year
    • Trial Team of the Year
    • America’s Most Influential Trial Lawyer
    • America’s Most Influential Law Firm
    • Lifetime Achievement Award
  • Shop
  • Magazine
    • A-List
  • Education and Networking Agenda
    • Trial Lawyers Summit
    • Top 40 Under 40 Trial Academy Boot Camp
    • Mass Torts Made Perfect
    • The Lanier Trial Academy Master Class 6.0
    • The Business Of Law
    • Webinars
  • Hall of Fame
    • Trial Lawyer Hall of Fame

NY Top Court Throws $600,000 Verdict for Teen’s Brain Discovered During Class Trip

Posted on July 8, 2015 by Larry Bodine
Classmates of teen discovered retained brain during a field trip to the autopsy room.

Classmates of teen discovered retained brain during a field trip to the autopsy room.

The New York Court of Appeals ruled that a family is not entitled to the $600,000 emotional distress jury verdict awarded to them after they received their teen son’s body for burial, unknowingly, without his brain.

The court dismissed the case ruling that a medical examiner is not obligated to inform a decedent’s next of kin that organs or tissue have been retained for further examination, even when the body is returned to the family for a burial.

The “tragic and unfortunate events” that gave rise to this case occurred in Staten Island, NY on January 9, 2005 when 17-year-old high school student Jesse Shipley was killed in a car accident.  Dr. Stephen de Roux, the New York City Medical Examiner, completed the autopsy on Shipley’s body. During the autopsy, de Roux, also removed Shipley’s brain and other tissue.

Brain retained for routine analysis

See also: Parents Liable for Emotional Distress Caused by Son’s Facebook Page that Bullied Classmate

Shipley’s brain was “fixed” in formalin fluid to allow for the proper analysis of brain tissue in a neuropathological examination, according to court documents.  Additional examinations are “routinely” performed after the body has gone through an autopsy and is released for funeral services.  Shipley’s funeral was held on January 13, 2005.

Neuropathological exam completed two months after funeral

Shipley’s brain, however, was not analyzed by neuropathologist, Dr. Hernando Mena, until March 9, 2005.  The medical examiner’s routine practice was to accumulate at least six brain specimens before contacting Mena to conduct the exams.

Mena’s examination on Shipley’s brain indicated that he had died from “multiple blunt trauma to the head” according to court documents.  Unfortunately, Shipley’s family learned of his preserved brain from classmates of Shipley’s who saw the jar containing his brain and labeled with his name during a field trip at the mortuary they took for a forensic science class.

The students from Shipley’s high school told his surviving sister, who told her parents, that Shipley’s brain was in a jar at the Richmond County Mortuary, where his autopsy was performed.

Lower court jury awards family $1 million in damages

The lower court found that the medical examiner did have an obligation to tell the family that when the body was available for burial, some of the organs were removed for further examination.  At trial, the jury awarded the Shipley family $1 million in damages, which was later, reduced to $600,000.

The City of New York appealed the decision, and the state’s highest court reversed the decision and jury verdict and dismissed the case.  The court determined that the medical examiner is required to turn over the “remains of” the decedent’s body to the next of kin for burial, but that the plain language of the law did not require the specific words of “tissue, organ or part thereof” to be returned to the next of kin.

Within medical examiner’s discretion to disclose

The court found that absent specific language to return more than the remains of the deceased, it is within the medical examiners discretion to determine what organ and tissue samples to retain.

It is also up to the medical examiner to determine whether to inform the decedent’s family whether the body had been returned without the organ or tissue specimens.

“There is simply no legal directive,” said the court, requiring medical examiners to return organs or tissue retained during an autopsy and his obligation is fulfilled once he returns the deceased body to his next of kin after a lawful autopsy has been conducted.

The case is Andre Shipley et al., v. City of New York et.al., in the Supreme Court of New York.

Posted in Auto Accidents, Blog, Consumer Protection

Comments are closed.

News Categories

Read about other Top Jury Verdicts

Salmon Purchasers Reach an $85 Million Price Fixing Settlement

Salmon Purchasers Reach an $85 Million Price Fixing Settlement

According to Reuters, who had seen the proposed settlement after it was filed on 25 May, the settlement will r[Read More...]
Ford Agrees to Pay $19 Million to Settle False Fuel Economy and Payload Claims

Ford Agrees to Pay $19 Million to Settle False Fuel Economy and Payload Claims

Ford Motor Company as agreed to a $19.2 million multistate settlement among 40 attorneys general that concluded an investigat[Read More...]
Total Settlement in Surfside Condo Collapse Tops $1 Billion

Total Settlement in Surfside Condo Collapse Tops $1 Billion

The proposed settlement reached nearly a year after the catastrophic Surfside building collapse along the South Flo[Read More...]
UCLA Will Pay Nearly $700 Million in Abuse Lawsuits

UCLA Will Pay Nearly $700 Million in Abuse Lawsuits

The University of California system announced Tuesday it will pay nearly $375 million to more than 300 women who said they we[Read More...]
Things to Consider When You Sue an Insurance Provider

Things to Consider When You Sue an Insurance Provider

We are all too acquainted with insurance coverage in our everyday lives. According to Investopedia, everyone should have[Read More...]

#LegalNews

@@TheNTLtop100

Contact Us | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

Attorney information and content provided on this website is provided for the benefit of members of The National Trial Lawyers and as a public service by Legal Associations Management, Inc. The website and all data are the property of Legal Associations Management, Inc. Data, including without limitation attorney information and content, on the site may not be mined, sold, or used commercially for any purpose without the explicit written consent of Legal Associations Management, Inc. This site may not be accessed by any automated program for extracting data for any use. By accessing and using the site you agree that you will not develop, support or use software, devices, scripts, robots, or any other means or processes (including crawlers, browser plug-ins and add-ons, or any other technology) to scrape data or otherwise copy profiles and other data. Unauthorized use or attempted unauthorized use of this system may subject you to both civil and criminal penalties.