The National Trial Lawyers
  • Home
    • Meet Our Team
    • Contact Us
    • Mission & Goals
    • FAQ
  • Webinars
  • News
  • Membership Directory
    • Top 100 Map – Civil Plaintiff
    • Top 100 Map – Criminal Defense
    • Top 40 Under 40 Map – Civil Plaintiff
    • Top 40 Under 40 Map – Criminal Defense
  • Top 100
    • Civil Plaintiff Officers / Executive Committee
    • Criminal Defense Officers / Executive Committee
    • Benefits
    • About
    • Top 100 President’s Message
    • Diplomat
    • Membership Renewal
    • Member Profile Updates
    • Top 100 Badge
    • Media
  • Top 40
    • Civil Plaintiff Officers / Executive Committee
    • Criminal Defense Officers / Executive Committee
    • Top 40 Under 40 Trial Academy Bootcamp
    • Benefits
    • About
    • Top 40 President’s Message
    • Membership Renewal
    • Member Profile Updates
    • Top 40 Badge
    • Media
  • Specialty Assoc
    • About
    • Shop
    • Officers
    • Membership Renewal
    • Member Profile Updates
    • Media
  • Nominate
    • Top 100
    • Top 40
    • Specialty Association
    • Trial Lawyer Hall of Fame
    • Trial Lawyer of the Year
    • Trial Team of the Year
    • America’s Most Influential Trial Lawyer
    • America’s Most Influential Law Firm
    • Lifetime Achievement Award
  • Shop
  • Magazine
    • A-List
  • Education and Networking Agenda
    • Trial Lawyers Summit
      • Summit Sponsors
    • Top 40 Under 40 Trial Academy Boot Camp
    • Mass Torts Made Perfect
    • The Lanier Master Class 5.0 Trial Academy 2021
    • Webinars
  • Hall of Fame
    • Trial Lawyer Hall of Fame

Claims Proceed in Transvaginal Surgical Mesh Claim

Posted on September 25, 2015 by Larry Bodine

Surgical meshA US District Court in Virginia allowed a woman’s lawsuit, charging negligent design and breach of implied warranty, to proceed against surgical mesh manufacturer Boston Scientific Corp. The court found genuine issues of fact exist as to whether the company acted unreasonably in designing the Obtryx.

Complications from Obtryx mesh

Bertie Frankum of Shelby, North Carolina, had the Obtryx Transobturator Mid-Urethral Sling System (Obtryx) implanted on February 9, 2009.  Hers is one of more than 70,000 cases pending in Multi district litigation dockets.

Because of the implantation, Frankum claims she has experienced complications of vaginal pain, dyspareunia, or pain and bleeding during intercourse.

See also: $1.75 Million Punitive Award Stands for Transvaginal Mesh Injury

Frankum brought a claim against Boston Scientific Corporation (BSC) for strict liability for design defect, manufacturing defect and failure to warn, negligence, breach of warranty, and punitive damages.

BSC moved for summary judgment asserting that Frankum’s legal theories were without evidentiary or legal support. Frankum agreed that her claim for strict products liability should be dismissed.

Negligent failure to warn claim dismissed

The court dismissed Frankum’s negligent failure to warn claim, citing the learned intermediary doctrine, which shields BSC from liability. The learned intermediary doctrine states that a manufacturer is not liable for failing to provide an adequate warning to the patient if an adequate warning or instruction had been provided to the physician or legal prescriber of prescription drug.

If the warning were to be found inadequate, a plaintiff must prove that the inadequate warning altered the physician’s decision to describe the drug.  The facts of the case found that Frankum’s doctor failed to rely on Obtryx directions for use and did not proximately cause Frankum’s injuries.

The court also sided with BSC and dismissed Frankum’s claim for negligent manufacturing of Obtryx because the record showed no evidence of negligence in the manufacturing process.  The court further found that her claim of BSC use of improper materials is a design defect claim, not a claim of negligent manufacturing.

The court dismissed Frankum’s breach of express warranty because her operating physician was not provided any warranty that she could then have relied on and he further admitted to not even reading the Obtryx directions for use.

Court allows some claims

The court denied BSC’s motion for summary judgment to dismiss the negligent design claim because genuine disputes of material fact exist as to whether BSC unreasonably designed and failed to adopt a safer more reasonable alternative design.

The court declined to dismiss Frankum’s claim on breach of implied warranty of merchantability.  The court reasoned that a juror could determine that BSC negligently designed Obtryx.  Frankum would then have the burden of proving that Obtryx was defective when it was sold and its defective nature caused her injury.

The case is Frankum v. Boston Scientific Corp., Case number 2:12 CV 00904 in the Charleston Division of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia.

Posted in Blog, Personal Injury, Product Liability

Comments are closed.

News Categories

Subscribe to Blog and VFJ via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog, the Voice for Justice and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Read about other Top Jury Verdicts

Intel Ordered to Pay a $2.2B Settlement in Patent Infringement Case

Intel Ordered to Pay a $2.2B Settlement in Patent Infringement Case

Intel was told to pay $2.18 billion after losing a patent-infringement trial over technology related to chip-making.Intel inf[Read More...]
What is Sexual Harassment?

What is Sexual Harassment?

Sexual Harassment Defined: Legally, sexual harassment is a form of sex discrimination that violates Title VII of the [Read More...]
Facebook Pays $650M to Settle a Privacy Dispute

Facebook Pays $650M to Settle a Privacy Dispute

WASHINGTON: A US federal judge has given final approval to Facebook's US$650 million payment to settle a privacy dispute betw[Read More...]
Pharmaceutical Giant Johnson & Johnson is Preparing $3.9B for Talc Settlements

Pharmaceutical Giant Johnson & Johnson is Preparing $3.9B for Talc Settlements

Pharmaceutical giant Johnson & Johnson has set aside $3.9 billion for talc-related litigation, according to a regulatory [Read More...]
Alaska Airlines Will Pay $3.19M Following the Death of a Passenger

Alaska Airlines Will Pay $3.19M Following the Death of a Passenger

Seattle-based Alaska Airlines has been ordered to pay more than $3 million to the family of a passenger of reduced mobility w[Read More...]

#LegalNews

@@TheNTLtop100

Contact Us | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

Attorney information and content provided on this website is provided for the benefit of members of The National Trial Lawyers and as a public service by Legal Associations Management, Inc. The website and all data are the property of Legal Associations Management, Inc. Data, including without limitation attorney information and content, on the site may not be mined, sold, or used commercially for any purpose without the explicit written consent of Legal Associations Management, Inc. This site may not be accessed by any automated program for extracting data for any use. By accessing and using the site you agree that you will not develop, support or use software, devices, scripts, robots, or any other means or processes (including crawlers, browser plug-ins and add-ons, or any other technology) to scrape data or otherwise copy profiles and other data. Unauthorized use or attempted unauthorized use of this system may subject you to both civil and criminal penalties.