Sport Spectator Injury Lawsuit Can Proceed Against Texas City Posted on October 27, 2015 by Larry Bodine Image credit: http://www.dibollday.org/history.shtml The supreme court of Texas has revived a premises-defect case against the City of Diboll, Texas, for a trip-and-fall injury sustained by a spectator at a youth softball game held a city park baseball complex. Carolyn Burns attended her granddaughter’s softball game at the Old Orchard Park baseball complex operated by the City of Diboll. While leaving the complex with approximately 1,500 other spectators, Burns tripped on a hollow pipe protruding from a walkway, causing her injury. City immunity dismisses claim The lower court denied the city’s plea to invoke a recreational use statute, which raises the liability standard against cities for recreational use of a facility. However, the court of appeals applied the recreational use statute and dismissed the case for want of subject-matter jurisdiction, holding that “spectating at a sporting event constitutes recreation.” State Supreme Court applies new case law The Supreme Court of Texas reversed the appeals court decision and remanded the case back to trial court, ordering the use of its recent opinion holding that determined that the recreation use statute is inapplicable to spectators at outdoor competitive-sporting events. In the case of University of Texas at Arlington v. Williams, the supreme court issued an opinion after the court of appeals’ opinion that “compels a different conclusion” in Burns case because the Williams opinion held that “neither watching a competitive-sporting event nor related acts of egress are encompassed in the recreation use statute’s definition of ‘recreation.’” In the Williams case, a spectator parent was injured while she leaned on a gate with a broken latch. Spectating not recreation The court focused on the statute’s definition of recreational use to enjoyment of playground equipment and the outdoors, narrowly covering activities closely connected to enjoying the outdoors. The court reasoned that the outdoors and nature are not integral to spectating and that spectating is not included in the definition of “recreational use.” The court remanded the case to the trial court, which has Burns estate’s personal representative as plaintiff because Burns died in an automobile accident while her case was pending. The case is Louie Lawson, Representative of the Estate of Carolyn Burns v. City of Diboll, Texas, case number 15-0037 in the Supreme Court of Texas.
