The National Trial Lawyers
  • Home
    • Meet Our Team
    • Contact Us
    • Mission & Goals
    • FAQ
  • Webinars
  • News
  • Membership Directory
    • Top 100 Map – Civil Plaintiff
    • Top 100 Map – Criminal Defense
    • Top 40 Under 40 Map – Civil Plaintiff
    • Top 40 Under 40 Map – Criminal Defense
  • Top 100
    • Civil Plaintiff Officers / Executive Committee
    • Criminal Defense Officers / Executive Committee
    • Benefits
    • About
    • Top 100 President’s Message
    • Diplomat
    • Membership Renewal
    • Member Profile Updates
    • Top 100 Badge
    • Media
  • Top 40
    • Civil Plaintiff Officers / Executive Committee
    • Criminal Defense Officers / Executive Committee
    • Top 40 Under 40 Trial Academy Bootcamp
    • Benefits
    • About
    • Top 40 President’s Message
    • Membership Renewal
    • Member Profile Updates
    • Top 40 Badge
    • Media
  • Specialty Assoc
    • About
    • Shop
    • Officers
    • Membership Renewal
    • Member Profile Updates
    • Media
  • Nominate
    • Top 100
    • Top 40
    • Specialty Association
    • Trial Lawyer Hall of Fame
    • Trial Lawyer of the Year
    • Trial Team of the Year
    • America’s Most Influential Trial Lawyer
    • America’s Most Influential Law Firm
    • Lifetime Achievement Award
  • Shop
  • Magazine
    • A-List
  • Education and Networking Agenda
    • Trial Lawyers Summit
      • Summit Sponsors
    • Top 40 Under 40 Trial Academy Boot Camp
    • Mass Torts Made Perfect
    • The Lanier Master Class 5.0 Trial Academy 2021
    • Webinars
  • Hall of Fame
    • Trial Lawyer Hall of Fame

Sport Spectator Injury Lawsuit Can Proceed Against Texas City

Posted on October 27, 2015 by Larry Bodine
Image credit: http://www.dibollday.org/history.shtml

Image credit: http://www.dibollday.org/history.shtml

The supreme court of Texas has revived a premises-defect case against the City of Diboll, Texas, for a trip-and-fall injury sustained by a spectator at a youth softball game held a city park baseball complex.

Carolyn Burns attended her granddaughter’s softball game at the Old Orchard Park baseball complex operated by the City of Diboll.  While leaving the complex with approximately 1,500 other spectators, Burns tripped on a hollow pipe protruding from a walkway, causing her injury.

City immunity dismisses claim

The lower court denied the city’s plea to invoke a recreational use statute, which raises the liability standard against cities for recreational use of a facility. However, the court of appeals applied the recreational use statute and dismissed the case for want of subject-matter jurisdiction, holding that “spectating at a sporting event constitutes recreation.”

State Supreme Court applies new case law

The Supreme Court of Texas reversed the appeals court decision and remanded the case back to trial court, ordering the use of its recent opinion holding that determined that the recreation use statute is inapplicable to spectators at outdoor competitive-sporting events.

In the case of  University of Texas at Arlington v. Williams, the supreme court issued an opinion after the court of appeals’ opinion that “compels a different conclusion” in Burns case because the Williams opinion held that “neither watching a competitive-sporting event nor related acts of egress are encompassed in the recreation use statute’s definition of ‘recreation.’”  In the Williams case, a spectator parent was injured while she leaned on a gate with a broken latch.

Spectating not recreation

The court focused on the statute’s definition of recreational use to enjoyment of playground equipment and the outdoors, narrowly covering activities closely connected to enjoying the outdoors.  The court reasoned that the outdoors and nature are not integral to spectating and that spectating is not included in the definition of “recreational use.”

The court remanded the case to the trial court, which has Burns estate’s personal representative as plaintiff because Burns died in an automobile accident while her case was pending.

 

The case is Louie Lawson, Representative of the Estate of Carolyn Burns v. City of Diboll, Texas, case number 15-0037 in the Supreme Court of Texas.

Posted in Blog, Personal Injury

Comments are closed.

Recent Posts

Intel Ordered to Pay a $2.2B Settlement in Patent Infringement Case

Intel Ordered to Pay a $2.2B Settlement in Patent Infringement Case

March 3rd, 2021

Intel was told to pay $2.18 billion after losing a patent-infringement trial over technology related to chip-making.Intel inf[Read More...]
What is Sexual Harassment?

What is Sexual Harassment?

March 1st, 2021

Sexual Harassment Defined: Legally, sexual harassment is a form of sex discrimination that violates Title VII of the [Read More...]
Facebook Pays $650M to Settle a Privacy Dispute

Facebook Pays $650M to Settle a Privacy Dispute

March 1st, 2021

WASHINGTON: A US federal judge has given final approval to Facebook's US$650 million payment to settle a privacy dispute betw[Read More...]
Pharmaceutical Giant Johnson & Johnson is Preparing $3.9B for Talc Settlements

Pharmaceutical Giant Johnson & Johnson is Preparing $3.9B for Talc Settlements

February 26th, 2021

Pharmaceutical giant Johnson & Johnson has set aside $3.9 billion for talc-related litigation, according to a regulatory [Read More...]
Alaska Airlines Will Pay $3.19M Following the Death of a Passenger

Alaska Airlines Will Pay $3.19M Following the Death of a Passenger

February 24th, 2021

Seattle-based Alaska Airlines has been ordered to pay more than $3 million to the family of a passenger of reduced mobility w[Read More...]

Contact Us | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

Attorney information and content provided on this website is provided for the benefit of members of The National Trial Lawyers and as a public service by Legal Associations Management, Inc. The website and all data are the property of Legal Associations Management, Inc. Data, including without limitation attorney information and content, on the site may not be mined, sold, or used commercially for any purpose without the explicit written consent of Legal Associations Management, Inc. This site may not be accessed by any automated program for extracting data for any use. By accessing and using the site you agree that you will not develop, support or use software, devices, scripts, robots, or any other means or processes (including crawlers, browser plug-ins and add-ons, or any other technology) to scrape data or otherwise copy profiles and other data. Unauthorized use or attempted unauthorized use of this system may subject you to both civil and criminal penalties.