The National Trial Lawyers
  • Home
    • Meet Our Team
    • Contact Us
    • Mission & Goals
    • FAQ
  • Webinars
  • News
  • Membership Directory
    • Top 100 Map – Civil Plaintiff
    • Top 100 Map – Criminal Defense
    • Top 40 Under 40 Map – Civil Plaintiff
    • Top 40 Under 40 Map – Criminal Defense
  • Top 100
    • Civil Plaintiff Officers / Executive Committee
    • Criminal Defense Officers / Executive Committee
    • Benefits
    • About
    • Top 100 President’s Message
    • Diplomat
    • Membership Renewal
    • Member Profile Updates
    • Top 100 Badge
    • Media
  • Top 40
    • Civil Plaintiff Officers / Executive Committee
    • Criminal Defense Officers / Executive Committee
    • Top 40 Under 40 Trial Academy Bootcamp
    • Benefits
    • About
    • Top 40 President’s Message
    • Membership Renewal
    • Member Profile Updates
    • Top 40 Badge
    • Media
  • Specialty Assoc
    • About
    • Shop
    • Officers
    • Membership Renewal
    • Member Profile Updates
    • Media
  • Nominate
    • Top 100
    • Top 40
    • Specialty Association
    • Trial Lawyer Hall of Fame
    • Trial Lawyer of the Year
    • Trial Team of the Year
    • America’s Most Influential Trial Lawyer
    • America’s Most Influential Law Firm
    • Lifetime Achievement Award
  • Shop
  • Magazine
    • A-List
  • Education and Networking Agenda
    • Trial Lawyers Summit
      • Summit Sponsors
    • Top 40 Under 40 Trial Academy Boot Camp
    • Mass Torts Made Perfect
    • The Lanier Master Class 5.0 Trial Academy 2021
    • Webinars
  • Hall of Fame
    • Trial Lawyer Hall of Fame

Medical Device Claims Not Barred by Texas Tort Reform Act

Posted on December 29, 2015 by Larry Bodine

spinedeviceIn this case of first impression, a Texas appeals court decided that personal injury claims against a manufacturer were not health care liability claims under the Texas Medical Liability Act “TMLA.”

The TMLA stated that claims brought against only health care providers and physicians qualified as health care liability claims. The plaintiff, Woods filed suit against Verticor and Dr. Hansen for off-label use of the Verticor Eclipse Sphere. The device was approved for use on spinal fusion surgeries but Hansen used the device for a non-fusion surgery treating Wood’s herniated disc.

What is a health care provider?

Verticor argued an evidentiary issue on appeal, stating the district court should have granted Verticor’s motion to dismiss because Wood failed to provide an expert report to support his claims.

However, the court determined the real issue was whether Verticor was a health care provider and licensed by the state to provide health care as defined by the act.

Another Interesting Read: Mass Tort Suits Proceed Against Syngenta for Genetically Modified Corn

The court interpreting the statute and plain meaning of health care and health care provider narrowed the issue. Health care under the TMLA is “any treatment performed or furnished, or that should have been furnished, by any health care provider for, to, or on behalf of a patient during the patients care, treatment, or confinement.”

Generally, a healthcare provider is a optometrist, physician, family doctor, or nurse. This does not include a manufacturer of medical products. As a device manufacturer, Verticor was not a health care provider; their only position was to provide a device that might be utilized in a patient’s treatment.

The court concluded the Verticor without additional facts could not use the TMLA to be considered. Because Verticor did not establish it was a health care provider, the Woods claim could not be considered a health care liability claim under the TMLA.

This case is Verticor, Ltd v. Michael Wood, Texas Court of Appeals Third District at Austin, Case No. 03-14-00277-CV.

Posted in Blog, Medical Malpractice, Personal Injury, Product Liability

Comments are closed.

News Categories

Subscribe to Blog and VFJ via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog, the Voice for Justice and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Read about other Top Jury Verdicts

Intel Ordered to Pay a $2.2B Settlement in Patent Infringement Case

Intel Ordered to Pay a $2.2B Settlement in Patent Infringement Case

Intel was told to pay $2.18 billion after losing a patent-infringement trial over technology related to chip-making.Intel inf[Read More...]
What is Sexual Harassment?

What is Sexual Harassment?

Sexual Harassment Defined: Legally, sexual harassment is a form of sex discrimination that violates Title VII of the [Read More...]
Facebook Pays $650M to Settle a Privacy Dispute

Facebook Pays $650M to Settle a Privacy Dispute

WASHINGTON: A US federal judge has given final approval to Facebook's US$650 million payment to settle a privacy dispute betw[Read More...]
Pharmaceutical Giant Johnson & Johnson is Preparing $3.9B for Talc Settlements

Pharmaceutical Giant Johnson & Johnson is Preparing $3.9B for Talc Settlements

Pharmaceutical giant Johnson & Johnson has set aside $3.9 billion for talc-related litigation, according to a regulatory [Read More...]
Alaska Airlines Will Pay $3.19M Following the Death of a Passenger

Alaska Airlines Will Pay $3.19M Following the Death of a Passenger

Seattle-based Alaska Airlines has been ordered to pay more than $3 million to the family of a passenger of reduced mobility w[Read More...]

#LegalNews

@@TheNTLtop100

Contact Us | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

Attorney information and content provided on this website is provided for the benefit of members of The National Trial Lawyers and as a public service by Legal Associations Management, Inc. The website and all data are the property of Legal Associations Management, Inc. Data, including without limitation attorney information and content, on the site may not be mined, sold, or used commercially for any purpose without the explicit written consent of Legal Associations Management, Inc. This site may not be accessed by any automated program for extracting data for any use. By accessing and using the site you agree that you will not develop, support or use software, devices, scripts, robots, or any other means or processes (including crawlers, browser plug-ins and add-ons, or any other technology) to scrape data or otherwise copy profiles and other data. Unauthorized use or attempted unauthorized use of this system may subject you to both civil and criminal penalties.