The National Trial Lawyers
  • Home
    • Meet Our Team
    • Contact Us
    • Mission & Goals
    • FAQ
  • Webinars
  • News
  • Membership Directory
    • Top 100 Map – Civil Plaintiff
    • Top 100 Map – Criminal Defense
    • Top 40 Under 40 Map – Civil Plaintiff
    • Top 40 Under 40 Map – Criminal Defense
  • Top 100
    • Civil Plaintiff Officers / Executive Committee
    • Criminal Defense Officers / Executive Committee
    • Benefits
    • About
    • Top 100 Presidents Message
    • Diplomat
    • Membership Renewal
    • Member Profile Updates
    • Top 100 Badge
  • Top 40
    • Civil Plaintiff Officers / Executive Committee
    • Criminal Defense Officers / Executive Committee
    • Top 40 Under 40 Trial Academy Bootcamp
    • Benefits
    • About
    • Top 40 Presidents Message
    • Membership Renewal
    • Member Profile Updates
    • Top 40 Badge
  • Specialty Assoc
    • About
    • Shop
    • Officers
    • Membership Renewal
    • Member Profile Updates
  • Nominate
    • Top 100
    • Top 40
    • Specialty Association
    • Trial Lawyer Hall of Fame
    • Trial Lawyer of the Year
    • Trial Team of the Year
    • America’s Most Influential Trial Lawyer
    • America’s Most Influential Law Firm
    • Lifetime Achievement Award
  • Shop
  • Magazine
    • A-List
  • Education and Networking Agenda
    • Trial Lawyers Summit
    • Top 40 Under 40 Trial Academy Boot Camp
    • Mass Torts Made Perfect
    • The Lanier Trial Academy Master Class 6.0
    • The Business Of Law
    • Webinars
  • Hall of Fame
    • Trial Lawyer Hall of Fame

Girl Who Lost Leg When Hit by Car Recovers $9.86 Million from Teen Driver

Posted on February 8, 2016 by Larry Bodine

A jury Placerville, CA, awarded $9,860,630 to a teenage girl who waiting at a school bus stop and was struck by a car that pinned her against a utility guy-wire, causing her to lose her right leg.

Following three weeks of evidence the jury found on January 24, 2016 that the defendant driver’s negligence was a substantial factor in causing injuries to Carly Bray, who was 17 when she was hit. It apportioned fault as follows: 50% defendant driver; 45% El Dorado Union High School District; and 5% County of El Dorado.

The jury deliberated for two days, according to plaintiff lawyers Catia G. Saraiva, Jason J. Sigel and Robert A. Buccola, all of Dreyer, Babich, Buccola Wood & Campora LLP, Sacramento, CA.

The case is Carly Bray v. Kassandra Hoelscher, No. PC20120677, Court Superior Court of El Dorado County, El Dorado, tried before Judge Daniel Proud. Prior to trial, the plaintiff settled with El Dorado Union High School District for $4.5 million and the County of El Dorado for $560,000.

intersection

The intersection of Pony Express Trail and Mace Road in Camino, CA.

Dangerous curve, icy road

Plaintiff Carly Bray, 17, was waiting for her school bus on March 1, 2012, at a bus stop whose location had been used for approximately 25 years by El Dorado Union High School District at the intersection of Pony Express Trail and Mace Road in Camino, CA.

Defendant Kassandra Hoelscher was driving westbound on Pony Express Trail on her way to high school when she lost control of her 1992 Chevrolet Blazer at 15-20 miles per hour. The car slid into the bus stop, striking plaintiff at approximately 5 miles per hour and pinning her against a utility guy-wire, resulting in a traumatic amputation of plaintiff’s right leg just below the knee. Hoelscher was a senior in high school on her regular route to school when the accident happened. 

Plaintiff Bray filed suit naming Hoelscher, the school district, and the County of El Dorado as defendants. Plaintiff alleged that the school district was liable for negligent placement of the school bus stop on the outside edge of a 45-mile per hour curve and that the county was liable for the dangerous condition of the curve on Pony Express Trail due to its inadequate banking.

Defendant Hoelscher denied liability throughout the litigation and trial, claiming:

  • Her travel speed was slow and that her loss of control was excusable because of the icy roadway conditions and characteristics of the roadway.
  • But for the negligent placement of the school bus stop on the outside of county’s dangerous curve, plaintiff would not have been injured.  
  • She lost control of her vehicle while traveling only 15 to 25 miles per hour in conditions plaintiff’s accident reconstruction and meteorology experts conceded were snowy and icy at the time the collision occurred.

High accident rate

The defendant’s expert traffic safety engineer testified that the intersection where the bus stop was located had an accident rate at least three times higher than similar intersections statewide and that the accident history provided years of notice to the county and school district that the bus stop needed to be moved long before the subject accident occurred.

The plaintiff’s traffic safety engineer testified that the irregular road banking and bus stop placement contributed to the accident. He had no opinion at trial that defendant Hoelscher did anything wrong. Plaintiff’s accident reconstruction expert also testified that the irregular superelevation was a likely cause of defendant’s loss of control. The jury heard evidence that the bus stop was relocated after the subject accident due to safety concerns.

Damage caused by amputation

Because of the loss of her right leg, Bray was no longer able to participate in the physical activities she enjoyed before the accident including competitive volleyball, horseback riding, hiking, snowboarding, and swimming. She also contended that her injuries limit her future earning potential because she is no longer able to pursue her dream career as a registered nurse even though she had yet to begin nursing school at time of trial.

Also read Trucking Company Settles Wrongful Death Collision Case for $11.6 Million

Prior to her recent right leg infection Plaintiff was employed as a supermarket courtesy clerk which required her to be on her feet several hours per day. Plaintiff asked the jury to award future lifetime medical and prosthetic care for her injuries, as well as support services due to her inability to physically manage household chores as she ages.

After the accident, plaintiff was transported via life flight to Sutter Roseville Medical Center where she underwent knee disarticulation surgery to remove what remained of her right tibia and preserve the distal end of her femur to assist in weight bearing once fitted with a prosthesis. Bray received physical therapy, chiropractic care, and counseling for anxiety and PTSD. Recently, plaintiff’s right leg became infected at the amputation site requiring her to discontinue use of her prosthesis for several months.

Plaintiff’s treating orthopedic surgeon and pain management/rehabilitation doctor testified that plaintiff’s desire to enter the field of nursing is not a good career choice even though for almost the last year she worked as a counter clerk at Raley’s requiring shifts of 6 to 8 hours on her feet. This was very hard on her, but she was able to endure this occupational pain.

The defense disputed the nature and extent of plaintiff’s injuries and damages and argued that the jury award less than plaintiff’s life care plan recommended for future pain medication due to evidence of plaintiff’s dislike of taking pain drugs.

Plaintiffs made a statutory demand of $2.9 million. Defendant offered her $100,000 policy limits with insurance from Safeco. Counsel in trial for Defendant indicated that Defendant would likely appeal at least one of the Court’s rulings.

Plaintiff Expert(s)

  • Carol Hyland, M.A., M.S., C.D.M.S., C.L.C.P., life care planning, Lafayette, CA
  • Paul Gregory, M.D., orthopedic surgery, Sacramento, CA
  • Robert Caldwell, P.E., accident reconstruction, Lafayette, CO
  • Elizabeth Austin, Ph.D., atmospheric physics/meteorology, Incline Village, NV
  • Sanjog S. Pangarkar, M.D., Los Angeles, CA
  • Sean Shimada, Ph.D., biomechanics, Davis, CA
  • Charles L. Scott, M.D., forensic psychiatry, Sacramento, CA
  • Richard F. Ryan, P.E., traffic safety engineering, Vancouver, WA
  • Richard Barnes, forensic economist, CPA/ABV/CFF
  • John Michael, Med, CPO/L, prosthetic care, Chicago, IL
Posted in Auto Accidents, Blog, Personal Injury

Comments are closed.

News Categories

Read about other Top Jury Verdicts

The New Mexico Supreme Court Upholds $165 Million Damage Awards in a Deadly FedEx Crash

The New Mexico Supreme Court Upholds $165 Million Damage Awards in a Deadly FedEx Crash

The New Mexico Supreme Court on Thursday upheld $165 million of jury awards against FedEx in a wrongful-death lawsuit stemmin[Read More...]
Noom Reaches a $56 Million Class Action Settlement Over Its Autorenewal and Cancellation Policy

Noom Reaches a $56 Million Class Action Settlement Over Its Autorenewal and Cancellation Policy

Weight-loss program Noom has agreed to a $56 million settlement to resolve class action claims regarding its autorenewal and [Read More...]
Virginians Will Receive $489 Million in a Payday Loan Settlement

Virginians Will Receive $489 Million in a Payday Loan Settlement

Online payday loan companies that charged as much as 919% interest will spend $489 million to reimburse some 555,000 borrower[Read More...]
The State of Minnesota Will Pay $1.5 Million to a Man Who Alleged Excessive Force During an Arrest

The State of Minnesota Will Pay $1.5 Million to a Man Who Alleged Excessive Force During an Arrest

Minneapolis has agreed to pay $1.5 million to a man who said police used excessive force when he was arrested during the prot[Read More...]
A $230 Million Settlement Is Reached Over a 2015 Southern California Oil Spill

A $230 Million Settlement Is Reached Over a 2015 Southern California Oil Spill

The owner of an oil pipeline that spewed thousands of barrels of crude oil onto Southern California beaches in 2015 has agree[Read More...]

#LegalNews

@@TheNTLtop100

Contact Us | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

Attorney information and content provided on this website is provided for the benefit of members of The National Trial Lawyers and as a public service by Legal Associations Management, Inc. The website and all data are the property of Legal Associations Management, Inc. Data, including without limitation attorney information and content, on the site may not be mined, sold, or used commercially for any purpose without the explicit written consent of Legal Associations Management, Inc. This site may not be accessed by any automated program for extracting data for any use. By accessing and using the site you agree that you will not develop, support or use software, devices, scripts, robots, or any other means or processes (including crawlers, browser plug-ins and add-ons, or any other technology) to scrape data or otherwise copy profiles and other data. Unauthorized use or attempted unauthorized use of this system may subject you to both civil and criminal penalties.