The National Trial Lawyers
  • Home
    • Meet Our Team
    • Contact Us
    • Mission & Goals
    • FAQ
  • Webinars
  • News
  • Membership Directory
    • Top 100 Map – Civil Plaintiff
    • Top 100 Map – Criminal Defense
    • Top 40 Under 40 Map – Civil Plaintiff
    • Top 40 Under 40 Map – Criminal Defense
  • Top 100
    • Civil Plaintiff Officers / Executive Committee
    • Criminal Defense Officers / Executive Committee
    • Benefits
    • About
    • Top 100 Presidents Message
    • Diplomat
    • Membership Renewal
    • Member Profile Updates
    • Top 100 Badge
  • Top 40
    • Civil Plaintiff Officers / Executive Committee
    • Criminal Defense Officers / Executive Committee
    • Top 40 Under 40 Trial Academy Bootcamp
    • Benefits
    • About
    • Top 40 Presidents Message
    • Membership Renewal
    • Member Profile Updates
    • Top 40 Badge
  • Specialty Assoc
    • About
    • Shop
    • Officers
    • Membership Renewal
    • Member Profile Updates
  • Nominate
    • Top 100
    • Top 40
    • Specialty Association
    • Trial Lawyer Hall of Fame
    • Trial Lawyer of the Year
    • Trial Team of the Year
    • America’s Most Influential Trial Lawyer
    • America’s Most Influential Law Firm
    • Lifetime Achievement Award
  • Shop
  • Magazine
    • A-List
  • Education and Networking Agenda
    • Trial Lawyers Summit
    • Top 40 Under 40 Trial Academy Boot Camp
    • Mass Torts Made Perfect
    • The Lanier Trial Academy Master Class 6.0
    • The Business Of Law
    • Webinars
  • Hall of Fame
    • Trial Lawyer Hall of Fame

Lumosity “Brain Training” Game Gets Drained by the FTC

Posted on February 2, 2016 by Larry Bodine

LumosityThe Northern District of California District Court has ordered Lumos Labs, Inc., the creators of the Lumosity “brain training” program, to pay the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) $2 million to settle charges alleging unfair or deceptive acts or practices and false advertisement.

The FTC alleged that Lumosity advertised false and unsubstantiated claims to improve work, school and athletic performance, treat “age-related decline in memory or other cognitive” impairments such as dementia and Alzheimer’s disease, and that it reduced cognitive impairment caused by Turner Syndrome, PTSD, and ADHD.

Misleading advertising

The order enjoined Lumosity from advertising such misleading statements, unless they were made on reliance of scientific evidence to substantiate its claims.  The order required the scientific evidence to include controlled human clinical testing performed by qualified researchers.

The order imposed a $50 million judgement, but required only $2 million.  The court suspended the remainder after reviewing Lumosity’s financial statements and tax returns from 2012, 2013 and 2014.  The order also required Lumosity to provide timely notice to all subscribers that clearly and conspicuously displays a one-step process to cancel an auto-renewal account.

See also: FTC Scrutinizing Online Lead Generation Companies

The court also imposed a compliance monitoring provision, requiring Lumosity to maintain all records and any human clinical testing and report to the Commission for 10 years.

Advertisement touched on cognitive fears

Lumosity had been highly advertised on TV, radio, and streaming online advertisements.  It was also marketed through emails, social media, and other websites and used Google AdWords to increase traffic to its website.  The company purchased hundreds of keywords related to memory, cognition, dementia, and Alzheimer’s disease, according to the FTC complaint.

The FTC also alleged Lumosity solicited customer testimonials through contests offering prizes such as a free IPad, trip to San Francisco, and lifetime memberships.  The membership process ranged from a monthly fee of $14.95 to a lifetime membership for $299.95.

“Lumosity preyed on consumers’ fears about age-related cognitive decline, suggesting their games could stave off memory loss, dementia, and even Alzheimer’s disease,” said Jessica Rich, Director of the FTC’s Bureau of Consumer Protection.  “But Lumosity simply did not have the science to back up its ads.”

The case is Federal Trade Commission, Plaintiff, v., Lumos Labs, Inc., a corporation, doing business as Lumosity, and Kunal Sarkar and Michael Scanlon, case number 132 3212 3:16-cv-00001 in the U.S. District Court Northern District of California.

Posted in Blog, Consumer Protection

Comments are closed.

News Categories

Read about other Top Jury Verdicts

Salmon Purchasers Reach an $85 Million Price Fixing Settlement

Salmon Purchasers Reach an $85 Million Price Fixing Settlement

According to Reuters, who had seen the proposed settlement after it was filed on 25 May, the settlement will r[Read More...]
Ford Agrees to Pay $19 Million to Settle False Fuel Economy and Payload Claims

Ford Agrees to Pay $19 Million to Settle False Fuel Economy and Payload Claims

Ford Motor Company as agreed to a $19.2 million multistate settlement among 40 attorneys general that concluded an investigat[Read More...]
Total Settlement in Surfside Condo Collapse Tops $1 Billion

Total Settlement in Surfside Condo Collapse Tops $1 Billion

The proposed settlement reached nearly a year after the catastrophic Surfside building collapse along the South Flo[Read More...]
UCLA Will Pay Nearly $700 Million in Abuse Lawsuits

UCLA Will Pay Nearly $700 Million in Abuse Lawsuits

The University of California system announced Tuesday it will pay nearly $375 million to more than 300 women who said they we[Read More...]
Things to Consider When You Sue an Insurance Provider

Things to Consider When You Sue an Insurance Provider

We are all too acquainted with insurance coverage in our everyday lives. According to Investopedia, everyone should have[Read More...]

#LegalNews

@@TheNTLtop100

Contact Us | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

Attorney information and content provided on this website is provided for the benefit of members of The National Trial Lawyers and as a public service by Legal Associations Management, Inc. The website and all data are the property of Legal Associations Management, Inc. Data, including without limitation attorney information and content, on the site may not be mined, sold, or used commercially for any purpose without the explicit written consent of Legal Associations Management, Inc. This site may not be accessed by any automated program for extracting data for any use. By accessing and using the site you agree that you will not develop, support or use software, devices, scripts, robots, or any other means or processes (including crawlers, browser plug-ins and add-ons, or any other technology) to scrape data or otherwise copy profiles and other data. Unauthorized use or attempted unauthorized use of this system may subject you to both civil and criminal penalties.