The National Trial Lawyers
  • Home
    • Meet Our Team
    • Contact Us
    • Mission & Goals
    • FAQ
  • Webinars
  • News
  • Membership Directory
    • Top 100 Map – Civil Plaintiff
    • Top 100 Map – Criminal Defense
    • Top 40 Under 40 Map – Civil Plaintiff
    • Top 40 Under 40 Map – Criminal Defense
  • Top 100
    • Civil Plaintiff Officers / Executive Committee
    • Criminal Defense Officers / Executive Committee
    • Benefits
    • About
    • Top 100 Presidents Message
    • Diplomat
    • Membership Renewal
    • Member Profile Updates
    • Top 100 Badge
  • Top 40
    • Civil Plaintiff Officers / Executive Committee
    • Criminal Defense Officers / Executive Committee
    • Top 40 Under 40 Trial Academy Bootcamp
    • Benefits
    • About
    • Top 40 Presidents Message
    • Membership Renewal
    • Member Profile Updates
    • Top 40 Badge
  • Specialty Assoc
    • About
    • Shop
    • Officers
    • Membership Renewal
    • Member Profile Updates
  • Nominate
    • Top 100
    • Top 40
    • Specialty Association
    • Trial Lawyer Hall of Fame
    • Trial Lawyer of the Year
    • Trial Team of the Year
    • America’s Most Influential Trial Lawyer
    • America’s Most Influential Law Firm
    • Lifetime Achievement Award
  • Shop
  • Magazine
    • A-List
  • Education and Networking Agenda
    • Trial Lawyers Summit
    • Top 40 Under 40 Trial Academy Boot Camp
    • Mass Torts Made Perfect
    • The Lanier Trial Academy Master Class 6.0
    • The Business Of Law
    • Webinars
  • Hall of Fame
    • Trial Lawyer Hall of Fame

Award to Scientology Reversed for Improper Procedure and Lack of Jurisdiction

Posted on March 10, 2016 by Larry Bodine

ScientologyFlorida’s Second District court of appeals ruled the trial court was void of jurisdiction in deciding a defendant’s motion and awarding damages on a voluntarily dismissed claim.

The Church of Scientology and Kennan G. Dandar had reached a settlement agreement in 2004 in a wrongful death suit against the organization.

Several hundred lawsuits have been brought against the Church of Scientology by former members and media outlets for criminal and civil issues.

In the agreement, Dandar agreed not to be involved in any adversarial proceedings against Scientology at any time or under any circumstances.

The parties subsequently agreed to dismiss the case without prejudice. The parties did not file any orders retaining jurisdiction over any dispute.

Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction

In 2009 Dandar filed a complaint against Scientology in a similar action. Scientology filed a motion stating Dandar violated the agreement and requested damages. Rather than following normal procedures and filing the motion with the clerk, Scientology handed the motion over to a judge.

See: NLRB Says Whole Foods Can’t Prevent Employees’ Workplace Recordings

The appeals court concluded that although there was a clause attempting to reserve jurisdiction, the voluntary dismissal trumped the parties’ agreement.

According to state civil procedure rule 1.420(a) and further explained by case law, is once a case is voluntarily dismissed, the proceeding is an act of finality that deprives the court of jurisdiction.

An exception occurs if the trial court dismissed the case based on the parties’ agreement. If so, the parties are allowed to file a motion to reopen the case, and to seek enforcement of the agreement.

In this case, no order was entered before or after the dismissal was filed. The result would have been different if Scientology and Dandar presented the agreement to the court for approval before filing a dismissal.

The court concluded that the trial court lacked jurisdiction to enforce the agreement and require Dandar to pay $1,068,156.50 in damages to Scientology.

Law of the Case Doctrine

Scientology argued the second district court was not allowed to review the trial court’s jurisdiction under the law of the case doctrine.

This law of case doctrine is limited to questions or law actually presented and considered on a former appeal. The court explained that its power extended to procedural questions and its decision was not on the merits.

Further the court stated Scientology would need to file an action for a new civil trial and give Dandar the opportunity to a trial by jury. With the previous proceeding Dandar was not given that right which made the previous proceeding improper.

The court reversed and remanded the case for an order of dismissal.

This case is Kenan G. Dandar and Dandar & Dandar PA v. Church of Scientology Flag Service Organization, Inc, Case No 2D14-1511, Second District Court of Appeal Of Florida.

Posted in Blog, Wrongful death

Comments are closed.

News Categories

Read about other Top Jury Verdicts

No thumbnail available

Things to Consider When You Sue an Insurance Provider

We are all too acquainted with insurance coverage in our everyday lives. According to Investopedia, everyone should have[Read More...]
The Rochester Diocese Offers a $147 Million Settlement to Sex Abuse Survivors

The Rochester Diocese Offers a $147 Million Settlement to Sex Abuse Survivors

The Rochester Catholic Diocese is offering a $147 million settlement to sex abuse survivors. This offer comes as a federal ba[Read More...]
Jury Awards $77.5 Million to an Army Veteran in a 3M Earplug Case

Jury Awards $77.5 Million to an Army Veteran in a 3M Earplug Case

A jury in Pensacola, Fla., federal court on Friday ordered 3M to pay $77.5 million to a U.S. Army veteran who said he suffe[Read More...]
The New Mexico Supreme Court Upholds $165 Million Damage Awards in a Deadly FedEx Crash

The New Mexico Supreme Court Upholds $165 Million Damage Awards in a Deadly FedEx Crash

The New Mexico Supreme Court on Thursday upheld $165 million of jury awards against FedEx in a wrongful-death lawsuit stemmin[Read More...]
Noom Reaches a $56 Million Class Action Settlement Over Its Autorenewal and Cancellation Policy

Noom Reaches a $56 Million Class Action Settlement Over Its Autorenewal and Cancellation Policy

Weight-loss program Noom has agreed to a $56 million settlement to resolve class action claims regarding its autorenewal and [Read More...]

#LegalNews

@@TheNTLtop100

Contact Us | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

Attorney information and content provided on this website is provided for the benefit of members of The National Trial Lawyers and as a public service by Legal Associations Management, Inc. The website and all data are the property of Legal Associations Management, Inc. Data, including without limitation attorney information and content, on the site may not be mined, sold, or used commercially for any purpose without the explicit written consent of Legal Associations Management, Inc. This site may not be accessed by any automated program for extracting data for any use. By accessing and using the site you agree that you will not develop, support or use software, devices, scripts, robots, or any other means or processes (including crawlers, browser plug-ins and add-ons, or any other technology) to scrape data or otherwise copy profiles and other data. Unauthorized use or attempted unauthorized use of this system may subject you to both civil and criminal penalties.