The National Trial Lawyers
  • Home
    • Meet Our Team
    • Contact Us
    • Mission & Goals
    • FAQ
  • Webinars
  • News
  • Membership Directory
    • Top 100 Map – Civil Plaintiff
    • Top 100 Map – Criminal Defense
    • Top 40 Under 40 Map – Civil Plaintiff
    • Top 40 Under 40 Map – Criminal Defense
  • Top 100
    • Civil Plaintiff Officers / Executive Committee
    • Criminal Defense Officers / Executive Committee
    • Benefits
    • About
    • Top 100 Presidents Message
    • Diplomat
    • Membership Renewal
    • Member Profile Updates
    • Top 100 Badge
  • Top 40
    • Civil Plaintiff Officers / Executive Committee
    • Criminal Defense Officers / Executive Committee
    • Top 40 Under 40 Trial Academy Bootcamp
    • Benefits
    • About
    • Top 40 Presidents Message
    • Membership Renewal
    • Member Profile Updates
    • Top 40 Badge
  • Specialty Assoc
    • About
    • Shop
    • Officers
    • Membership Renewal
    • Member Profile Updates
  • Nominate
    • Top 100
    • Top 40
    • Specialty Association
    • Trial Lawyer Hall of Fame
    • Trial Lawyer of the Year
    • Trial Team of the Year
    • America’s Most Influential Trial Lawyer
    • America’s Most Influential Law Firm
    • Lifetime Achievement Award
  • Shop
  • Magazine
    • A-List
  • Education and Networking Agenda
    • Trial Lawyers Summit
    • Top 40 Under 40 Trial Academy Boot Camp
    • Mass Torts Made Perfect
    • The Lanier Trial Academy Master Class 6.0
    • The Business Of Law
    • Webinars
  • Hall of Fame
    • Trial Lawyer Hall of Fame

Association Dues have “Super Priority” over Bank Mortgages

Posted on June 23, 2016 by Larry Bodine

ForeclosureThe Rhode Island Supreme Court ruled that a condo association’s lien extinguishes a bank mortgage lien.

Michael J. Botelho purchased a condo in Rhode Island in 2004. Some time after the purchase, Botelho defaulted on his condominium dues and his mortgage. The condominium association placed a lien on the property and sold it at an auction for $21,000 to the plaintiff, Twenty Eleven.

Botelho had a mortgage with PNC; two years after Twenty Eleven purchased the property, PNC sent a letter stating the bank would proceed with a foreclosure sale.

In an effort to stop the sale, Twenty Eleven filed suit to quiet title to the condo and permanently prevent the bank having any interest in the property.

HOA Lien Takes Priority

Twenty Eleven relied on the Rhode Island Condominium Act § 34-36.1-3.21 (c) which states an association’s lien takes priority over first mortgages, and that when the association foreclosed on the lien and sold the property at auction the mortgage was extinguished.

Twenty Eleven also argued that the bank failed to exercise its right to redeem within 30 days of the sale and that the plaintiff received the property free and clear of the mortgage.

See Also: NLRB Orders Samsung to Stop Use of Employment Agreement Waiving Right to Sue

No Payment Priority

PNC argued the act only created payment priority and that the mortgage obligation would remain. PNC believed that if the bank instituted a foreclosure proceeding, as a secured creditor the association would receive money to satisfy the lien.

During a bench trial, the judge decided against the plaintiff, stating there was no language in the statute supporting the argument and granted the defendant’s motion to dismiss.

The specific provision at issue is officially called the “lien assessment” or unofficially the “super priority lien.” The act allows a homeowner association to institute two liens–one that takes higher priority over the mortgage or other encumbrances, and the other that is of lower priority to mortgages and the deed of trust.

The state supreme court concluded that “prior to” has a special meaning in the mortgage and lien context.  Additionally, the foreclosure principles provide that a “lien with lower priority are extinguished if a valid foreclosure sale yields proceeds to satisfy the higher priority lien.”

Missed Opportunities to Preserve Interest

A review of other statutory provisions including the split-lien concept and the court’s interpretation of this statute also concluded that an association lien took true priority over a mortgage.

The judge believed the defendant had several options at its disposal to retain their interest in the property but failed to do either. The bank could have paid the outstanding dues and added increased the mortgage amount or required association dues to be paid into an escrow account.

The bank ultimately stated the defendant could have avoided losing its interest, if it had availed itself to one of those options.

The court agreed that the conclusion was “draconian in nature” but says “we are also reminded of the ancient maxim “dura lex sed lex,” meaning the law may be harsh, it is still the law.

This case is Twenty Eleven, LLC v. Michael J. Botelho et al., Case No 2014-10-Appeal, Rhode Island Supreme Court.

Posted in Blog

Comments are closed.

News Categories

Read about other Top Jury Verdicts

Salmon Purchasers Reach an $85 Million Price Fixing Settlement

Salmon Purchasers Reach an $85 Million Price Fixing Settlement

According to Reuters, who had seen the proposed settlement after it was filed on 25 May, the settlement will r[Read More...]
Ford Agrees to Pay $19 Million to Settle False Fuel Economy and Payload Claims

Ford Agrees to Pay $19 Million to Settle False Fuel Economy and Payload Claims

Ford Motor Company as agreed to a $19.2 million multistate settlement among 40 attorneys general that concluded an investigat[Read More...]
Total Settlement in Surfside Condo Collapse Tops $1 Billion

Total Settlement in Surfside Condo Collapse Tops $1 Billion

The proposed settlement reached nearly a year after the catastrophic Surfside building collapse along the South Flo[Read More...]
UCLA Will Pay Nearly $700 Million in Abuse Lawsuits

UCLA Will Pay Nearly $700 Million in Abuse Lawsuits

The University of California system announced Tuesday it will pay nearly $375 million to more than 300 women who said they we[Read More...]
Things to Consider When You Sue an Insurance Provider

Things to Consider When You Sue an Insurance Provider

We are all too acquainted with insurance coverage in our everyday lives. According to Investopedia, everyone should have[Read More...]

#LegalNews

@@TheNTLtop100

Contact Us | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

Attorney information and content provided on this website is provided for the benefit of members of The National Trial Lawyers and as a public service by Legal Associations Management, Inc. The website and all data are the property of Legal Associations Management, Inc. Data, including without limitation attorney information and content, on the site may not be mined, sold, or used commercially for any purpose without the explicit written consent of Legal Associations Management, Inc. This site may not be accessed by any automated program for extracting data for any use. By accessing and using the site you agree that you will not develop, support or use software, devices, scripts, robots, or any other means or processes (including crawlers, browser plug-ins and add-ons, or any other technology) to scrape data or otherwise copy profiles and other data. Unauthorized use or attempted unauthorized use of this system may subject you to both civil and criminal penalties.