$1M Settlement for Ex-Officer Breaking Into Home While on Vacation

Does anyone remember Michael J. Reynolds, the former officer with the New York Police Department who flew to Nashville, Tenn., to attend a 3-day bachelor party in 2018 and ended up breaking into the home of Black woman Conese Halliburton and her four sons, who lived next to the Airbnb he was staying in? You might remember that Reynolds hurled racial slurs at the family, cursed at them and even threatened them with violence. You might also remember that he was sentenced to 15 days in jail behind the offense but somehow wasn’t removed from the force.

Well now, more than 2 years after the incident, a federal district court judge has ruled that the Klan-ish ex-cop must pay out $1 million to the Black family he terrorized.

Read the source article at theroot.com

The Root Causes Of Semi-Truck Accidents

Semi-trucks and other big industrial automobiles are a typical sight on Interstate Highways and also in rural areas. Almost 2 million semi-trucks function by distributing items throughout the USA which substantially contributes to the economy.

Semi-trucks are categorized as weighing more than 10,000 pounds. These trucks can be involved in crashes involving serious injuries and deaths. Accidents including big semi-trucks have a tendency to occur in rural areas or interstate freeways. While there are lots of root causes of vehicle mishaps, a collision with another vehicle is one of the most typical.

Because of their size, semi-trucks require a reasonably long time to stop. It is very easy to see just how the driver of a smaller automobile would suffer injuries in a semi-truck crash. Semi-truck mishaps happen for all the same reasons as passenger car crashes. Truck drivers are ten times more likely to be the root cause of a mishap. However, some factors for semi-truck crashes are a lot more common. The following are the most typical sources of truck crashes:

Accidents Triggered By Truck Driver:

Drive or Human Error

Driver error makes up the highest portion of semi-truck accidents, making it one of the most common root causes of crashes. According to the FMCSA, eighty-eight percent of truck associated collisions are because of the error of the driver. This can include accidents triggered by a speeding driver, a driver who fails to inspect his blind spot before switching over lanes, and driver error. Some of the mistakes truck drivers can make include anything from negligent driving( e.g., speeding), to distracted driving(e.g., texting), to substance usage and/or abuse. 

One more major contributor is driver exhaustion. While truck drivers are required to comply with hours of service plans that figure out the length of time they can be behind the wheel for a single stretch, a number of drivers still drive long term hours and travel long distances. This leads to sleep deprivation and tiredness, putting them at high danger for mistakes as well as collisions.

Overspeeding/ Overtaking

Truck owners usually demand that truck drivers reach particular destinations within a specific time period. This is not always achievable due to several concerns, including inadequate weather conditions and traffic snarl ups in some sections of the roadway. Nevertheless, due to the stress that the drivers are put under to satisfy these deadlines along with the threat they encounter of losing their jobs, the motorists normally drive over the speed limit. 

Overtaking by these huge vehicles at such astonishing speeds pressures approaching drivers in smaller sized automobiles to veer off the road resulting in accidents, the majority of which are fatal. Overtaking additionally has the result of significantly lower reaction time. When driving at high speeds, drivers might be needed to damage right away or instantly veer right into one or more lanes of the road. When at higher speeds, stopping is not always feasible.

Driver Fatigue

Driver fatigue is also a major problem among the trucking community. While the hours that truck drivers work are determined and restricted by regulations, they still frequently have long hours and demanding schedules. Some truck drivers require themselves to remain awake through long haul drives when they need to be taking certain breaks and also relaxing. 

Truck drivers schedules are typically made up in a way that urges driving quicker and much longer than is secure. A vehicle may after that drive in potentially risky weather conditions to satisfy target dates. This can prompt drivers to lose focus, neglect secure driving methods, and trigger accidents. Exhaustion is the most typical reason for motorist error. Almost 40% of all vehicle crashes are attributed to tiredness.

Distracted Driver

Inattention and interruption can trigger crashes for truckers just like they cause issues for drivers of passenger vehicles. Driving for numerous hours cross country, truck drivers can become bored when driving and on a regular basis look for something to keep them occupied. This impulse to kill the boredom leads them to do one of numerous points. Is the driver consuming snacks, alcohol consumption, daydreaming or sending a text? 

The most typical one is using their phones to read or respond to a text message, make phone calls, or even see their preferred social networks websites. Changing the radio station while driving has also been attributed to distracted driving, resulting in mishaps. When traveling in the nation, the function of some radio terminals is poor in specific areas. This causes the drivers to get over to their radios and discover a station they can listen to. This happens when they get on the freeway driving at a high speed. Even a split second when a motorist takes his eyes off the roadway could be the distinction between safety and security, creating a crash.

Driving Under The Influence

It is illegal in every state to drive under the influence of alcohol or drugs. Lots of truck drivers have actually been found guilty of using alcohol and non-medicinal drugs while on duty. Prescription and also non-prescription medications are a substantial problem as they typically hinder the capability of the driver to navigate such a big truck properly. Some just take these substances at stops in communities throughout the country while others go a step further and lug alcohol and drugs with them while driving. 

Regardless of how they use these substances, their driving ends up being impaired and they can easily create accidents. It is not only controlled substances that can lead to crashes when driving. Some prescription medicines that the drivers might be making use of likewise have the result of hindering their synchronization and reasoning, leading to road crashes. Industrial motorists are specifically held to a higher requirement than passenger vehicles and the public. 

They are only permitted a little alcohol in their system due to the fact that the dimension, weight as well as pressure of a semi-truck make them a fundamental risk to others when traveling. Security is of vital importance to drivers and because of enhanced danger of semi-trucks causing injury or death, they are held to greater requirements and standards. Intoxicated drivers can cause extreme threat to themselves and everybody else on the road.

Failing To Secure Loads

Whatever item the vehicle is lugging, it is critical that the claimed product is very carefully packed and also secured so weight is evenly distributed across the vehicle. Failing to correctly disperse the weight can make it more probable that a truck will certainly get involved in a crash. This is especially true when turning or attempting to stop. When an item is not properly tied down, it can possibly fly off the trailer onto the roadway right into the course of one more vehicle causing a potential road threat or auto crash.

Low Filled Liquid Loads

Lots of trucks transport liquids like gas and oil. These trucks were made to hold a specific amount of fluids before they are complete. It can be hazardous to maintain the truck partly full, due to the fact that the fluids can splash around in the trailer and consequently cause the vehicle to sway back and forth with turns and modifications in speed. Additionally, if a liquid makes an unexpected halt, a driver might cause a mishap.

Rear End Crashes

A rear end collision is among the most dangerous kinds of collisions. This sort of collision can happen when a semi-truck motorist fails to quit or slow their car in time to prevent a collision with an automobile before them. The vehicle strikes in the rear, usually with considerable pressure. A vehicle is not efficient in taking this heavy of an influence and will likely crumble. All vehicle occupants are in danger of injuries in the event of a rear-end collision. Back seat passengers in these situations have a more specifically high threat of injury.

Lack Of Training

There is a high need for truck drivers and also in some cases, the trucking companies rarely do sufficient training or work on their motorists’ skills. This subsequently can bring about harmful and also extreme mishaps, especially given that trucks are so hefty and large. 

Prior to truck drivers being able to drive substantial commercial lorries on public roads, they are required to put in a specific threshold of training hours and to satisfy. Nevertheless, not all truck drivers adhere to these guidelines. What you get subsequently is an improperly educated truck driver with little experience behind the wheel.

Lack Of Maintenance

Trucking companies are required by law to maintain their vehicles and also keep them in a condition that makes certain safety guidelines. Nevertheless, because there are prices and also time associated with preserving semi-trucks, this cuts into profits in making shipments. Similarly, vehicle owners are needed by law to ensure that their vehicles remain in top notch condition when hitting the roads. Nevertheless, they do not typically do this due to the costs involved and time it takes to maintain the trucks– time they might otherwise use to make shipments. Poorly preserved vehicles being driven by poorly trained drivers is just one of the biggest sources of truck mishaps.


According to the National Freeway Safety Management, at least 29% of vehicle crashes involve brake failure. This can be due to faulty evaluation, lack of upkeep, condensation or getting too hot. The federal government needs truck firms and drivers to remain on top of their brake conditions at all times. More than one situation can be responsible for brake failure. Manufacturers and developers can additionally be responsible. Badly maintained vehicles are among the largest root causes of truck mishaps.


Another typical problem found in huge truck accidents includes its tires. With so much riding on them, it is of the utmost value that they are constantly carrying out securely. Flaws in style, inadequate upkeep, and lack of appropriate examination can cause tire blowouts, which can cause significant devastation in the form of truck crashes.

Not Caused by Driver:

Issues With The Road Or Highway

Truckers invest a great deal of time taking a trip down random highways, generally in the evening. When roadways are not kept in exceptional maintenance, or when there are obstacles on them, they can perhaps cause accidents. If a trucker experiences climate problems on these highways( snow, heavy rainfall, etc.), the danger of a crash boosts. Even the most conscious vehicle driver can not entirely avoid the threat of a vehicle collision in certain roadway conditions.

Vehicle Malfunctions

Troubles with the truck itself can usually cause mishaps and collisions. Mechanical failures can happen when there is a defective design or installment of truck elements, such as when brakes fail to work properly. Trucks have to likewise be packed and maintained well. Failing to do so can cause rollovers, jackknifing, and different other hazardous scenarios that put other drivers in danger.

Accidents Caused By Passenger Vehicles:

The Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) supplies ideas and also resources for commercial truck drivers as well as various other motorists. Common hazardous acts committed by car vehicle drivers at huge trucks, which typically result in truck accidents consist of:

  • Driving in the “No-Zones”– the areas behind and also beside a vehicle where the truck driver has actually limited or absolutely no exposure.
  • Changing lanes quickly before a truck.
  • Maneuvering to the right of a vehicle that is making a right turn.
  • Turning improperly right into traffic, creating a truck to maneuver or brake swiftly.
  • Failure to reduce or speed up when a truck begins to change lanes or merge.
  • Unsafe passing, especially passing with insufficient ground.
  • Passing a truck, after that being blown out of placement by air turbulence or cross-wind.
  • Pulling into website traffic from the roadside in front of a truck without accelerating completely.
  • Driving in between large vehicles.
  • Abandoning a car in a travel lane, or falling short to get a handicapped car entirely off the freeway as well as onto the shoulder.




$325K Settlement Reached in Excessive Force from Las Cruces Police

LAS CRUCES – A lawsuit accusing a Las Cruces police officer of excessive force and his supervisors of negligence was dismissed with prejudice late last month after the city agreed to settle for $325,000.

Jacob Sanchez, who was left without an areola after an encounter with a police K-9, filed a lawsuit against Las Cruces Police Officer Isaiah Baker and others in March 2019.

Baker has been sued at least twice before for excessive use of force, according to court records.

Sanchez’s suit argued that Baker’s history of misconduct should have prevented the officer from becoming a K-9 handler and also named five of his supervisors within the Las Cruces Police Department and city of Las Cruces. 

Read the source article at Las Cruces Sun

University of Utah $10.5M Settlement for Family of Murdered Student

SALT LAKE CITY, Utah (KUTV/CBS) — On the two year anniversary of Lauren McCluskey’s death, University of Utah President Ruth V. Watkins and Lauren’s parents announced a settlement agreement in the McCluskey’s lawsuit against the U.

The terms of the settlement are as follows, according to court documents:

Through its risk management agency and its insurance provider, the University of Utah will pay the McCluskeys $10.5 million by March 31, 2021.
The University of Utah will make a $3 million donation to the Lauren McCluskey Foundation no later than March 31, 2021. No tuition or state-appropriated funds will be used in making this donation, the U stated.
The University of Utah pledged to build an indoor track for the Track and Field team, which Lauren was apart of before she died.
The University of Utah’s Center for Violence Prevention will be renamed as the McCluskey Center for Violence and Prevention.

Read the source article at localnews8.com

$28M Settlement for Family of Grandmother Killed by Falling Tree

Family members of a 61-year-old San Pedro grandmother who was killed by a falling 80-foot tree at her daughter’s 2016 wedding party in Whittier have reached a tentative $28 million settlement with the city, according to court papers filed by the plaintiffs’ attorneys.

The lawsuit stemming from Margarita Mojarro’s death was filed in Los Angeles Superior Court in April 2017, alleging wrongful death and that a dangerous condition of public property existed.

The case was later transferred to Norwalk Superior Court and the plaintiffs’ motion for a finding that the settlement was made in good faith is scheduled to be heard Friday by Judge Raul Sahagun.

Read the source article at Whittier Daily News

$2.75M Settlement Reached in Inmate’s Flu Death

The Oregon Department of Corrections agreed to pay a record $2.75 million to the family of a man who died from the flu at the Oregon State Penitentiary and has apologized for the man’s “needless and preventable death.”

The amount is the largest settlement ever paid to an individual plaintiff in Oregon prison history. 

The settlement comes nine months after the family of Michael Barton filed a $15 million wrongful death lawsuit accusing prison staff of failing to treat the 54-year-old inmate for the flu and then covering up his flu-related death. 

On Tuesday, ODOC Director Colette Peters publicly apologized to Barton’s family. 

Read the source article at Statesman Journal

Princeton Settles Gender Pay Gap Lawsuit for $1.2M

Princeton University has agreed to pay nearly $1.2 million in wages to 106 female professors, to resolve allegations of discrimination in salary and gender pay gap flagged by a compliance review by the US Department of Labor.

Of the total amount, $925,000 would be distributed in back pay, which would include employees that have left the institute and at least $250,000 will be paid in future salary adjustments.

The Department of Labor started an investigation in 2012 as part of a routine compliance procedure and found glaring disparities in the salaries of women in the capacity as full professors to that of their male counterparts, over a period of two years.

Read the source article at News18.com

Remembering the Legacy of RBG

Some remember her as a lobbyist, and some might remember her as a feminist icon. However, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, or “RBG” will certainly be remembered as a champ of equal rights. She made it her life’s work to make certain that no matter what gender you are or who you love, that you will be treated as an equal in American culture and in the eyes of the law. She did this by getting rid of gender-based stereotyping in regulations as well as legislation. Several think about RBG architect of the legal defence ladies’ rights in the 1970’s. 

Certainly, she transformed the lives for American women of all walks of life. By the time she took her seat on the Supreme court, she had revolutionized the lawful rights of females that extended from their individual lives to the office. She became a symbol to modern women of every age, passionately dubbing her the “Notorious RBG”. She will forever be remembered for her contribution to female’s legal rights in America. As Justice Ginsburg always fervently reiterated from the Old Testament, “Justice, justice, thou shalt pursue.”

While several recognize her for her time on the Supreme Court, long before this she was influencing the legal realm and society in its entirety from her work as a district judge in addition to being an attorney and law professor. Born in 1933, by 1959 at 25 years old she was a clerk to a judge in the United States District Court.

·       In the 60’s she was a research associate and professor at Columbia and Rutgers School of law respectively. 

·       In the 70’s she was general counsel for the ACLU and founded their Women’s Rights Project.

·       In the 80’s she was appointed by President Jimmy Carter as judge of the US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. 

·       In the 90’s she was sworn in as Supreme Court justice filling the seat of Justice Byron White on the U.S. Supreme Court. She was the second woman on the Supreme Court. She stayed in this position for 27 years until her death.

At the ACLU Women’s Rights Project, Ginsburg argued 6 as well as won 5 Supreme Court cases in the 1970’s.

Achievements as a Litigator:

RBG obtained her law degree from Columbia Law School in 1959 after attending Harvard Law School from 1956-1958. She had the ability to obtain a clerkship in the United States District Court for the Southern District Court of New York City from 1959-1961. Triggered from being deprived by her status as a female, Ginsburg passionately advocated gender equality. She altered millions of lives from her work as a lawyer. Prior to her time on the bench, she argued six cases in front of the Supreme Court, and won five of these.

RBG was a pioneer of women’s rights, working tirelessly to make sure that women were given the same treatment as their male counterparts in whatever context. Her fight against sex-based discrimination started far prior to her role on the High court. In her own experiences after finishing law school, she found that her gender was an obstacle to progressing in her profession. Although Ginsburg was ranked first in her graduating class at Columbia Law, she did not get work at any of the 12 preliminary firms she interviewed at. Further, Supreme Court Justices declined to take her as a staff regardless of raving referrals from professors at Harvard Law. 

Ginsburg fought for a lot more than women’s rights. While she is most definitely remembered as a symbol for feminism, a lot of Ginsburg’s lawful triumphs were not based on sex discrimination. Ginsburg further defended impaired individuals, undocumented people and the LGBTQ+ community. She focused on expanding civil liberties in regards to voting rights as well. Ginsburg also literally created the book on laws of gender discrimination, which was released 1974. When RBG initially began her legal campaign, ladies were treated much differently from their male equivalents.

Ginsburg argued six cases on equality prior to the U.S. Supreme Court. She made use of a gender-blind technique in her fight for women, impressing that every person no matter the gender was entitled to equal rights. Ginsburg argued Frontiero, Weinberger v. Wisenfeld, Califano v. Goldfarb, Durn v. Missouri, as well as Edwards v. Healy in front of the Supreme Court.

When Ginsburg started dealing with the American Civil Liberties Union or ACLU, she started litigating sex discrimination cases. Her primary method was to slowly handle winnable cases to ultimately eliminate institutionalized discrimination against females with lawful criterion.

Notable Cases Argued 

Reed v. Reed: (1971 )

RBG represented Sally Reed in 1971. Reed thought that she needed to be executor of her kid’s estate opposed to her ex-husband. The court held that the state could not automatically prefer males over women to be executors of estates. This was the very first time the court struck down a state legislation because of gender discrimination. 

Moritz v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue: (1972 )

Ginsburg’s first big case was to oppose a law that prevented Charles Moritz from taking a tax reduction for the care of his 89-year-old mother. Ginsburg’s husband called this instance the going through a formula of asking the court to apply laws to both sexes. The government specified that this decision “cast a cloud of unconstitutionality over thousands of federal statutes.” These laws would certainly turn out to be the cases that Ginsburg would function relentlessly to overturn in the following decade.

Frontiero v. Richardson (1973 )

The court decided in this landmark case argued by Ruth Bader Ginsburg on behalf of the ACLU, that a statute that imposes requirements on women but not on similarly situated men violates the Due Process Clause of the 5th amendment. The court plurality agreed that when applying a strict standard of review to sex-based classification, that the government interest in administrative convenience could not justify administrative practices. During this case, which was Ginsburg’s first oral argument before the Supreme Court, she quoted Sarah Grimke, a 19th-century abolitionist and suffrafette, stating, “I ask no favour of my sex. All I ask of our brethren is that they take their feet off our necks.” Ginsburg argued her case successfully and this case became a vital decision on the landscape of gender equality. 

Wienberger v. Wisenfeld (1975 )

In this case argued by Ginsberg, the court found for her client Mr. Wisenfeld who was a widower. The court located that sex based distinction in Social Security Advantages does breach the Fifth amendment of the Due Process Clause. The court found unanimously that the function of social safety benefits is to allow the enduring partner to correctly care for the youngsters, no matter the parent’s gender.

General Electric Co. c. Gilbert (1976 )

In this case, the court concluded that pregnant women were treated differently from nonpregnant women. While the ACLU’s amicus curiae brief affirmed that pregnant women typically sufferered of sex discrimination, the court saw it a different way. Nevertheless, after this, the company proceeded lobbying as well as their initiatives led to a modification to Title VII that developed that pregnancy discrimination in the workplace is considered sex discrimination and is illegal.

Success as a Judge:

Before her time as a Supreme Court justice, Ginsburg was refused a clerkship from that very court. While extremely recommended by her Harvard professor for the placement of clerk for the High court, the justices were not prepared to hire women and rejected her entrance. In 1980, President Jimmy Carter appointed her to the United States Court of Appeals where she served up until her visit to the United States Supreme Court in 1993 by President Clinton. Ruth Bader Ginsburg created American history during her time on the court. As a judge, Ginsburg started known as “The Great Dissenter” for her intense dissents from the viewpoints of her fellow high court justices. In talking about her dissents, Ginsburg stated that she hoped some of these would end up becoming law one day. 

Notable Cases from the Bench

USA v. Virginia (1996 )

In 1996, Ginsburg proceeded to defend gender equality under the 14th amendment. Ginsburg composed the majority opinion, a 7-1 ballot that the Virginia Military Institute might no more be an all-male institution. Virginia suggested not only that ladies were not matched for VMI’s extensive training, yet likewise that a separate females’ just military program was sufficiently equivalent. The court disagreed. This situation developed a new test for gender discrimination cases.

Olmstead v. LC (1999 )

Some states once allowed people with psychological handicaps to live in their own communities under the Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act. (ADA) Two Georgia ladies were held in isolation for years at a psychological medical facility following their first treatments, also after being clinically approved to move to a more community based setting. The court held that Georgia had actually gone against the community mandate. Ginsburg stated that the outcome of this case stood for the fact that unjustified isolation continues presumptions that persons once in isolation are unable or not worthy of joining community life.

 Stenberg v. Carhart (2000 )

This Nebraska case made it to ensure that under the Fourteenth amendment, a state cannot pass an anti-abortion legislation that does not consist of an exemption for the health of the mother.

Ledbetter v. Goodyear Tire (2007 )

Lily Ledbetter sued against Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company for sex discrimination that caused unequal treatment. While the claim was barred, Ginsburg composed a dissent that the majority’s judgment ran out touch with the facts of wage discrimination, missing out on real definition of Title 9, the statutes “broad therapeutic objective” and recommended that the Legislature remedy the Court’s reading of Title 9. This dissent led to the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act of 2009, which changed the Civil Right Act of 1964 to identify when an unlawful work technique happens pertaining to discrimination on the basis of sex. After this Act was passed, Ginsburg recognized that if the Supreme Court majority would not provide the answer and result some hoped for, that the judges in the minority could still persuade Congress to settle this grievance outside of the borders of the courtroom.

Shelby Region v. Holder (2013 )

The court kept in this case that the limitations mandating southern states obtain approval before changing voting needs was dated. Ginsberg declared that “tossing out preclearance when it has actually functioned, resembles throwing out your umbrella in a rainstorm since you are not getting wet.

Obergefell v. Hodges (2015 )

Ginsburg obtained assistance from all the justices on this case with her bottom line argument that extending marital rights to homosexual couples would certainly not damage the establishment of marriage.She argued that all of the incentives and benefits that marriage affords would still be available, therefore nothing was being taken away from heterosexual couples. These couples, she argued, would have the same incentives to marry and benefits from marriage that they currently have. 


In 1999, after her time as a lawyer, judge and High court Justice, Ginsburg obtained the Thurgood Marshall Honor for her contributions to equal rights and civil liberties.

Ginsberg battled cancer throughout her life, and also never ever missed out on a day of oral arguments even while she was undergoing radiation treatment. Ginsberg verified through this journey that she was a force to be reckoned with.

RBG left quite the legacy when she died at the age of 87, September 18, 2020 from complications from metastatic pancreatic cancer. Ginsburg shaped the lives of modern American women with her progressive opinions. As her profession as a lawyer and also Justice has instructed us, and Ginsburg specified, “Real change, sustaining change, takes place one step at a time.”








Johnson & Johnson Adds $1B to Opioid Settlement

Johnson & Johnson announced on Tuesday that it is adding $1 billion to its contribution to the all-in settlement deal struck last year that would resolve opioid lawsuits against the company. 

The settlement is part of the $48 billion framework that four states announced one year ago in which Johnson & Johnson and four other companies agreed to provide $22 billion in cash and $26 billion worth of a generic opioid addiction treatment, product distribution and data tracking measures. 

The drugmaker said its additional contribution “results from continued negotiations and is intended to maximize participation in the settlement.” The amount brings the company’s contribution up to $5 billion.

Read the source article at The Hill

Settlement Reached in West Virginia VA Hospital Deaths

CHARLESTON, W.Va. (AP) — Tentative settlements have been reached in several civil lawsuits filed on behalf of the families of veterans who died at a West Virginia hospital where a former nursing assistant admitted to intentionally killing seven people with fatal doses of insulin.

The settlements were disclosed by U.S. Sen. Joe Manchin of West Virginia on Saturday as well as in federal court filings stemming from the deaths of six veterans at the Louis A. Johnson VA Medical Center in Clarksburg.

The proposed settlement amounts range from $700,000 to $975,000. The court filings said a Nov. 20 hearing is scheduled.

Read the source article at CBS Pittsburgh