Together Again at the 2021 Trial Lawyers Summit

On January 31 – February 3, 2021, The National Trial Lawyers will present the annual Trial Lawyers Summit, hosted at the Loews Miami Beach Hotel in Miami Beach, Florida. This conference is a unique gathering of America’s most outstanding civil plaintiff and criminal defense lawyers. Offering various networking opportunities and informative sessions, the Trial Lawyers Summit provides attorneys the chance to improve their trial skills and business management.

“The Trial Lawyers Summit is always a massive hit. There are tons of interesting educational sessions, excellent speakers, great networking events, and a fantastic venue. I’ve been to many conferences, but the Trial Lawyers Summit offers a unique experience. I’d strongly encourage any trial lawyer to attend the next one,” says Lisa Blue, 2020 President of The National Trial Lawyers.

Packed with compelling speakers, valuable conversations, exclusive social functions, and plenty of opportunities to enjoy catered meals and remarkable amenities, the Trial Lawyers Summit will become your focal point in the new year.

“Every year that I go, I enjoy it. The program is great. The networking is amazing because you can hang out and learn a lot by example and through anecdotal stories while you’re there,” says John J. Givens, a lawyer with The Cochran Firm – Dothan.

Attorneys, paralegals, students, and firm administrators from far and near flock to our unique, family-friendly conference each year to experience the most relevant legal sessions and engaging networking events.

“There are great events and great parties, but the substance of what you get and what you can take back to your practice to use on Monday is what makes the difference,” says Dustin Herman, a lawyer with The Spangenberg Law Firm.

The sessions hosted at the Trial Lawyers Summit introduce tactical, useful insights for lawyers at any stage in their career. Education at the Trial Lawyers Summit focuses on digital marketing, mass torts, criminal defense, women’s leadership, trucking and automobile litigation, traumatic brain injury litigation, and much more.

“I go year after year. Every year, they have the best lineup with the most engaging speakers. They have the speakers that are in the trenches trying cases day in and day out,” Herman says.

If you are determined to enhance your legal processes, registering for the Trial Lawyers Summit is the first step. Whether you are trying your first case or your hundredth, perfecting your practice starts with the Trial Lawyers Summit.

To register for the 2021 Trial Lawyers Summit, click here.If you’d like to view the full agenda, click here.

8 Ways Police Can/Cannot Lawfully Infringe on Your Civil Liberties

The ACLU has commonly stated that the method to construct the toughest case for reform is via looking into cops departments, and uncovering pertinent policies as well as practices they enforce. The company has also stated that to understand officers’ staminas and also weaknesses it is very important to contrast them to other divisions. A crucial topic is the use of physical force. This consists of comprehending your regional cops division’s formal written policies on how policemans are supposed to act as well as not behave in particular scenarios. According to the National Institute of Justice, there is “no solitary, generally agreed-upon meaning of use of pressure.” The Institute explains, the use of pressure usually depends on the officers and circumstance due to the fact that no 2 police officers or situations coincide. While there is no nationwide database of cases in which cops usage too much pressure, just in 2015 in 2019, the FBI introduced a national use-of-force information collection.

While officers often get assistance from their specific companies, no global collection of rules regulates when officers ought to use pressure or even how much. If there is a limit, this is usually department-based, and also set on a force continuum. There are 5 primary levels of authorities use force which are often found in a force continuum. Additionally, there are 6 main degrees of resistance to take into consideration.

Infographic on 6 degrees of resistance

Continuums need to think about lots of factors. These consist of the private’s resistance degree, the officer/civilian factors and unique aspects as well as the reasonable level of pressure for that scenario.

Several projects as well as organizations shine light on how the use of physical pressure must be limited by police divisions across the country. Among these tasks is Campaign Zero. The Task located that even more restrictive use pressure plans are associated with fewer police included murders.

They have actually offered numerous plan services to much better make use of various other techniques to limit civilians besides the use of extreme force which infringes on basic civil rights. Four main plan options provided in this area by the task were:

  1. Establish standards as well as reporting of police use of lethal force
  2. End traffic associated authorities killings as well as unsafe high speed cops chases
  3. Modify and also enhance regional cops department use of pressure plans
  4. Screen just how authorities use pressure and proactively hold police officers answerable for too much pressure

The task also created a version use of force plan based on evaluation and analysis of reliable use of pressure plans throughout the country. The task explains, “the cops include evidence educated restrictions on authorities use pressure that are developed to dramatically lower cops violence in areas.”

Another job named the “Use of Pressure Project”, integrated a listing of policies used by law enforcement agent across the nation that frequently fail to include restrictions on police force. Nonetheless, these plans are legal, albeit, they often infringe on standard human rights of private citizens across the country – overmuch so with individuals of color. Checking out the 100 biggest authorities divisions in America, the plans they have in the area might surprise you.

Policies Where Police Can Legitimately Infringe on Your Civil Liberties

Right here are some plans that exist throughout some of the greatest authorities departments in America. While these are lawful, they infringe on your civil rights and also stats prove it.

  1. Falling Short to Require Officers to De-Escalate.

44/100 of the police divisions reviewed call for policemans to de-escalate situations where possible prior to making use of force. Using de-escalation tactics consists of verbalization, producing range, time as well as room, tactical reposition and also other approaches whenever feasible instead of utilizing pressure.

  1. Allowing Officers to Choke or Strangle Civilians

28/100 of the police divisions assessed explicitly ban chokeholds and grips or limit these techniques to scenarios where lethal pressure is authorized. This can include carotid restrictions, hog-tying and also carrying individuals face down in a lorry, restraining oxygen to respiratory tracts. Using such a treatment, this is only approved when the aggressor is making use of harmful pressure. As a result, harmful force ought to only be utilized against lethal force in this circumstance when it pertains to chokeholds. This tactic is typically used where much less lethal pressure could be used rather resulting in the unnecessary injury or even fatality of private citizens.

  1. Failing to Require Police Officers to Intervene and also Stop Excessive Pressure

48/100 of the police departments evaluated call for officers to intervene to quit another policeman from utilizing too much force. Significant progression has actually been made in the area of cop’s misconduct in using dangerous force since the 1970’s. This naturally resulted from a reduction in racial disparities. Statistics reveal while in the 1970’s 6 individuals of shade were killed by authorities to one white person, today that number is down to 3 people of color to one white killed. This occurred via more stringent inner policies on the use of harmful pressure. Early treatment systems have also been revealed to reduce the average variety of issues against policemans in a cops department by greater than 50%. This includes reporting policemans who obtain two or even more grievances in a month, who have two or more use of force events in the past quarter, and afterwards calling for police officers to participate in re-training and be kept track of by a prompt manager after their very first quarterly report and also end a police officer complying with several reports

  1. Stopping Working to Restrict Officers From Capturing at Moving Automobiles

17/100 cops departments examined need police officers to provide a verbal warning, when possible, prior to utilizing fatal force. The rule in these instances is typically from the situation Tennessee v. Garner, where for the use of lethal pressure, the officer is warranted in shooting if they reasonably believe they are acting in response to an unavoidable risk of fatality or significant physical injury to themselves or various other persons.

  1. Failing to Develop a Pressure Continuum

84 of the 100 police divisions evaluated have a Force Continuum or Matrix consisted of in their use pressure plan, defining the types of force/weapons that can be used to respond to particular kinds of resistance. Force is sanctioned under details conditions where the police officer is acting in protection or defense of one more person. This policy is important to restrict the sorts of force as well as weapons that can be used to reply to particular kinds of resistance.

  1. Falling Short to Need Policemans to Exhaust All Various Other Sensible Means Prior To Turning To Deadly Force

42/100 authorities departments reviewed require officers to exhaust all various other practical alternatives before resorting to using deadly pressure. Project Zero has produced solutions to this problem. They explain that while cops eliminate numerous unarmed people, European nations do very little of this. Solutions used by the task include developing requirements and also reporting cops use dangerous pressure as well as licensing fatal pressure just when there is an impending threat to a police officer’s life or the life of one more individual.

  1. Failing to Require Police Officers to Provide a Verbal Caution When Feasible Prior To Capturing a Civilian

67/100 of the cops departments reviewed needed the policeman to give a spoken caution, when feasible prior to using deadly pressure. Project Zero has actually also commented on this, explaining that prior to harmful pressure is utilized, the civilian must be provided a practical quantity of time to follow this warning.

  1. Stopping Working to Require Policemans to Record Each Time They Utilize Pressure or Intimidate to Use Pressure Against Civilians

25/100 of all the cops divisions examined require policemans to report all uses of force consisting of endangering an additional private with a weapon. Further than this, Project No commented that the division ought to call for the names of both the policeman( s) involved as well as sufferer( s) to be released within the 72 hrs of deadly force.

8 Circumstances Where Cops Can not Legally Infringe On Your Civil liberties

According to the ACLU, because 9/11, cops have actually seriously misused their power and also have actually infringed on the legal rights of private citizens. Here are some instances of police abusing their power in such a way it legally infringes on your rights.

  1. Warrantless Wiretapping

Using phone conversation of Americans without a warrant is in offense of government laws as well as the Constitution. Eavesdropping on discussions of innocent Americans and wide data mining systems have actually ended up being a bigger problem in the 2000’s.

  1. Torture, Kidnapping and also Detention

While because 9/11, government actors have actually illegally abducted, apprehended and also hurt a variety of prisoners. These stars assert that they have the power to designate any noncombatant including an American as an “opponent fighter” without charge. Investigation right into Apprehension Centers have actually exposed several civil rights misuses as well as violations of International Law.

  1. Security

The USA have been encountering an enormous attack on their personal privacies with an increasing quantity of data collection, storage, tracking and mining. New innovations that have actually included the brand-new centuries have in turn aided to produce a “surveillance culture” of kinds.

  1. Misuse of the Patriot Act

Abuse of this act includes sending letters concerning national security to Americans that have no relationship to terrorism.

  1. Genuine ID

The 2005 Real ID Act laid the foundation for a national ID card, making it harder or persecuted people to seek asylum.

  1. No Fly and also Selectee Lists

The “No-Fly Checklist” was produced to keep tabs on private citizens the government restricts from traveling since those people have been labelled as a security threat. Considering that 9/11, the list has actually grown to consist of virtually 1 million names. The checklist has been kept in mind as erroneous, with many innocent people on the listing for no apparent reason, with little choice. Several members of Congress have additionally been flagged consisting of Legislator Ted Kennedy.

  1. Political Spying

Federal government actors have actually conducted snooping procedures on innocent Americans. Through the Flexibility of Information Act, the ACLU discovered that the government had actually been keeping an eye on relaxed teams. The TALON program which was a database constructed from illegally gathered info of anti-war groups was shut down in 2007.

  1. Abuse of Material Witness Statute

Given that 9/11, federal government stars have jailed and also restrained a variety of law following citizens with the material witness statute which permits the arrest and also brief detention of “material witnesses”. Lots of Muslims have actually been apprehended, and never ever treated as witnesses for crimes in that their testimony was never safeguarded where no efforts were made. Imprisonment of these “material witnesses” was from 6 months to over a year.


Comprehending which rights you have which can and can not be infringed upon in particular instances, it is very important to accumulate data from your local authorities department, to understand how they contrast to various other departments across the nation on vital issues. To locate information, the ACLU has suggested using:

  1. Data Established by Area Citizens
  1. Formal Complaints Filed By Citizens
  1. Interior Cops Reports

Additionally it is necessary to comprehend your local police headquarters’s policies. To do this, refer to their Standard procedure (SOP) manual which contains the division’s official plans. This record should be readily available to the public, as well as if it is not, this is totally unacceptable under many state’s open documents regulations. The division ought to not keep any kind of SOP handbook. Moreover, the department should have an extremely restrictive harmful pressure policy. While a lot of huge city divisions do, small departments have not caught up to the fad. In this manner of community, surveillance must assist hold authorities departments liable to claimed plans, as well as subsequently ideally accomplish much less fierce areas with much less racial variation as a result.


To conclude– understand your legal rights, understand when cops as well as know when government stars can as well as can not infringe upon them legally. Studies show the more plans In position that restrict fierce pressure, even more innocent lives are saved. It is important to investigate your regional police, and also comprehend their standard procedure. Enlighten on your own on their policies. Study the globe of data and also discover how much force they use with violent weapons and also what their method is regarding this.

Interested in learning more or reading other articles like this one? Visit to find out more about your civil rights and other interesting topics. 

The History of American Police Brutality

The Start of Policing


In the U.S., the evolution of police followed England. Early colony patrolling functioned in two formal and communal styles, known as the “Watch” system, or private-for-profit policing, named “The Big Stick.” The watch system involved area volunteers whose primary engagement was to report a crisis. Boston established a night watch in 1636, New York in 1658, and Philadelphia in 1700. Still, this was not an efficient means of crime control. Watchmen commonly drank or slept on the job. Many “volunteers” tried to evade military service, were commanded by draft into duty by their town, or operated watch services as a sort of discipline. In 1833, Philadelphia built the first day watch. Then in 1844, New York began a day watch as an extension to its new police unit. The developing watch system was a practice of official law enforcement officers, constables, typically backed by the fee system for warrants.

Constables had numerous non-law enforcement roles to perform, such as assisting as land surveyors and validating the correctness of weights and capacities. In multiple cities, they held the charge of commanding the activities of the night watch. These means of policing served much after the American Revolution. In the 1830s, the first notion of a centralized community police department appeared. Boston authorized the original American police force in 1838. New York City accompanied this in 1845, Albany, NY and Chicago in 1851, New Orleans and Cincinnati in 1853, Philadelphia in 1855, and Newark, NJ and Baltimore in 1857. All vital American centers possessed local police divisions by the 1880s. These newest police systems yielded similar styles:

  1. Bureaucratic
  2. Backed by the public
  3. Full-time, constant employees
  4. Set systems and practices
  5. Subject to necessary governmental authority

New United States police organizations had two principal elements: they were reputably corrupt and blatantly cruel. Local politicians continued with the authority of the police. In most regions, the home political party ward lead selected the police official to control the ward leader’s community. The ward leader usually was the neighborhood tavern keeper, occasionally the area vendor for gambling and prostitution, and generally the governing power over the area’s juvenile gangs who were employed to threaten adversary party balloters. With poor habits, political crime, and coordinated frenzy, it was known that the policemen were wicked. Police typically accepted payoffs to support illegal drinking, hustling, and gambling. They organized master criminals such as robbers and pickpockets to grant protection in trade for news or bribes. They also actively engaged in vote-buying and ballot-box-stuffing. Genuine political operatives displaced to police officers with zero qualifications and limited training. Police department advances were not won. Instead, they were bought. Police drank alcohol while watching, defended vice actions, and were keen to employ oppressive authority. These modern U.S. police units met three controversies:

  1. Should they dress in uniform?
  2. Should they carry guns?
  3. How much power could they apply?

Neighborhood traders and industry people spurred the advancement of community policing and favored uniformed police. The thought was for clear distinguishment by individuals seeking aid, and apparent police occupancy on neighborhood streets. Some police denied wearing a uniform, considering that it would provoke ridicule and display themselves as clearly identifiable targets for violence. Police officers started bearing sidearms, notwithstanding the public’s concern that doing such gave significant power to the police and state. Departments formally armed their police authorities after officers had informally brandished firearms themselves.

In the 1830s and 1840s, use-of-force in apprehension was as controversial as it is today. Because officers were mainly involved in implementing public order laws upon drunkenness and gambling, irritating labor organizers, and surveilling liberated slaves and immigrants, the public’s view supported limitations on use-of-force. However, the advantage of an armed presence allowed to apply deadly force followed the interests of economic elites who fancied established police departments. The troops were believed crucial because the “organizations intervened between the propertied elites and propertyless masses who were regarded as politically dangerous as a class.” From the derivation, police in the United States have been confined to the economy’s desires and demands.

As for the modern-day, it emerges probable that new weight on technology and science, expressly regarding scrutiny of citizens, and on neighborhood appeasement through policing in communities, will replay the downfalls of history as the ways of the future. Today’s stories of police harshness are not a modern phenomenon.


Martin Luther King, Jr., in 1963, said, “There are those who are asking the devotees of civil rights, ‘When will you be satisfied?” This message continues to reverberate in modern times after a lengthy past of brutal encounters between black Americans and police. “We can never be satisfied as long as the Negro is the victim of the unspeakable horrors of police brutality.”

“This idea of police brutality was very much on people’s minds in 1963, following on the years, decades really, of police abuse of power and then centuries of oppression of African-Americans,” says William Pretzer, Smithsonian museum senior history curator.

Social media and live streams have progressed police brutality incidents beyond the black population and mainstream interpretations. “Modern technology allows, indeed insists, that the white community take notice of these kinds of situations and incidents,” Pretzer says.

As technology has evolved, so has the means of law enforcement. Departments with substantial militant equipment are presented as standard in U.S. neighborhoods. “What we see is a continuation of an unequal relationship that has been exacerbated, made worse if you will, by the militarization and the increase in fire power of police forces around the country,” Pretzer claims. According to the curator, the answers lie in correcting troubled police-community relations and crushing social inequalities.

If you’ve been the victim of police brutality, a personal injury lawyer can help. Please call The Cochran Firm’s 24/7 call center today at 1-800-THE-FIRM (673-1555) or send us a message on our website.

Daily News Egypt


Deaths by police officers are progressively prominent as a political issue. After examining records from the Chicago Police Department from the 1870s to the 1920s, historian Jeffrey S. Adler found that these killings are not new incidents. During the times records cover, police in Chicago killed 307 individuals, factoring one in eighteen killings in the city.

Throughout the late nineteenth century, police officers’ responsibilities in Chicago were to preserve order, serve alongside reputably corrupt officials, and set down the labor crisis. Officers managed leeway on how to achieve these expectations. In Illinois, criminal law warranted using deadly force in self-defense, to prevent riots that endanger officers, or to deter suspects from fleeing.

However, during the first dates of Adler’s examinations, police cruelty was mainly limited to the overflowing use of clubs. Chicago Police Department officers exterminated around 49 people from 1875 to 1900. This number grew to 65 during the first decade of the 20th century. In the 1910s, it rose to 153. An escalation in violent crime serves to explain the increase in police brutality. Chicago’s homicide percentage almost doubled from 1890 to 1920.

Additionally, the nature of cruelty changed. Through the 1870s and ’80s, most murders resulted from drunken arguments. By 1900, homicides were more inclined to result from robberies concerning numerous middle-class victims. 3% of Chicago’s community and 21% of death by police victims within 1910 and 1920 were Black Americans.

Adler registers that among political stress to exert force on criminals and officers’ answers to “a racially different and seemingly more alien, dangerous class of criminals,” the police often discharged weapons at suspects to hinder escape. This was the single explanation that the police presented for shooting weapons in 41% of police murders from 1890 to 1920. They shot loiterers, thieves, and purse-snatchers. Police also slew bystanders by firing their guns into crowds or confusing the suspect’s identity, which accounted for 1 in 10 slayings by police.

A police officer murdered a child by shooting him in 1910 after mistaking his identity. The police chief unveiled that the boy “probably was large for his age.” This response is analogous to those we receive today.


During the 1950s and 60s, the civil rights action confronted police cruelty and further racial discrimination and segregation, alongside the opposition to the Jim Crow systems in the South. In Detroit, black Americans endured unfairness through a segregated housing market and free schools, discriminatory hiring practices, and racist policing.

Wayne State University

Brutality fixed on black Americans by police officers in Detroit and additional places in the Jim Crow North was rooted in progressive police of racial power. Sometimes, the Detroit Police Department operated illegally, such as unlawful investigative arrests, racial profiling, and actively resisted civil rights requests for a civilian review board to review police cruelty. The department additionally and illegally put labor and civil rights organizations, like the NAACP, beneath political monitoring through the “‘Red Squad,’ a parallel to the Jim Crow South that has received insufficient attention.”

“We can never be satisfied as long as the Negro is the victim of the unspeakable horrors of police brutality,” said Martin Luther King, Jr. in 1963. “We want an immediate end to police brutality and murder of black people,” was covered within the ten points in the 1966 Black Panther Party Platform.


In 1973, Robert Hoyt rear-ended Raymond Peterson on a highway in Detroit, Michigan. Hoyt allegedly fell asleep while driving home after a late night at work. Peterson, a police officer in an unmarked vehicle, considered the crash was a planned action. Gary Prochorow, Peterson’s partner, witnessed the collision while operating his own unmarked car.

Prochorow also believed the event was intended. After sounding out of his vehicle for Hoyt to pull over, Prochorow fired at Hoyt from his car. Hoyt left the highway in a panic, with the officers trailing closely behind. Eventually, he was left with no alternative but to surrender following an exit ramp. Peterson exited his car and assumed Hoyt reached for a firearm under his seat. “My reaction was instinctive, sharp like a scalpel,” Peterson claimed. “Boom. He went down.”

However, Hoyt was unarmed. Peterson cut his jacket with a knife, cleaned it of fingerprints, and flung it near the crime scene. Hoyt was shot in the abdomen and later pronounced dead upon arrival at the hospital.

In a 1971 Detroit Free Press profile, Peterson was defined as seeming “more like a radical college professor or folk singer than what he is—a Detroit policeman who has probably been part of more violence in recent months than any other cop in the country.” Hoyt was the 10th gun death that Peterson issued across two years.

STRESS, as the police system became noted, unveiled to be an excessive and lawless authority. In 1961, Peterson became a Detroit Police Department officer at 25 years old. During his first years, he was accountable for six injuries and gained 41 citations and commendations. Peterson was chosen in 1971 to enroll in an elite, deeply undercover unit within the agency. The organization fought crime on city roads, but grew wicked in distinguished Detroit’s communities, resembling a killer team. As knowledge about Peterson’s murders broadcasted, he was denounced by some of the city’s occupants and backed by his associates.


In March of 1991, four officers were caught on videotape beating Rodney King after tracking him through Los Angeles, California. The video and results that followed frightened the city and moved the nation. This footage of police cruelty was one of the first of its kind and enduringly altered discussion about race and policing in the United States.

King sped while intoxicated and strived to elude LAPD officers. Numerous units, including a helicopter, trailed him, ultimately forcing the man to cease his retreat. The video filmed by George Holliday reveals the officers applying tasers while kicking and beating the man with batons more than 50 times.

Hammer Museum

“King claims, and several witnesses support him, that he never resisted,” Jerry Bowen, CBS News correspondent, declared. “Twenty-five-year-old Rodney King showed his injuries to reporters — the bruises, broken leg, and the scar from the stun gun which jolted him with 50,000 bolt shocks.”

In April of 1992, officers Timothy Wind, Laurence Powell, Stacey Koon, and Theodore Briseno went to trial and were acquitted by a mostly Caucasian jury. The following days in Los Angeles were loaded with arson, looting, riots, and extreme violence. In a press conference carried out by Rodney King, he begged, “can we all get along?” By the conclusion of the riots, there were over two thousand injuries and 55 deaths.

President George Bush declared the officers’ actions “sickening” and faced violent riots, describing rioters as “revolting.” King settled for $3.8 million and encountered several disputes with police as the years progressed. In 2011, he was detected driving while under the influence. King died in the pool in his backyard in 2012 with evidence of marijuana, PCP, cocaine, and alcohol in his system.


In 2011, St. Louis officer Jason Stockley shot Anthony Lamar Smith after he fled. Stockley considered the man was dealing drugs. After Stockley was reported announcing he was “going to kill this motherf—er,” he was charged in 2016. In 2017, he was acquitted of first-degree murder. Stockley announced he saw a gun prior to shooting, which was considered legally justified.

Stockley’s acquittal sparked riots in St. Louis that launched police units dressed in riot gear following rioters throwing rocks and breaking windows. Protesters proceeded to St. Louis Mayor Lyda Krewson’s residence but were halted by officers. The authorities resorted to rubber bullets fired at the crowd and securing hundreds of arrests.

Al Jazeera

In 2013, the department completed a lawsuit for wrongful death with the family of Smith for $900,000. However, Stockley never got jail time. A judge in 2018 allowed the lawyer for Smith’s family to resume discovery in the case after learning the defendants had stored evidence of DNA that conferred Stockley had planted a firearm in Smith’s car. The family was awarded an additional $500,000 a year later.


In Baton Rouge, two officers took Alton Sterling to the ground after responding to an anonymous call reporting Sterling for loitering outside a store to sell CDs. After sounding that Sterling had a gun, officer Salamoni shot him dead. The officers contended Sterling was a threat, concluding that he reached for his firearm. However, the video reveals Sterling motionless before being killed. Protests arose in Baton Rouge following Sterling’s murder, where multiple demonstrators were arrested. The Department Of Justice instated an investigation of civil rights into the occurrence. Salamoni was laid off, but none of the officers were charged.



In Minnesota, police responded to a call of resident George Floyd using counterfeit money. Derek Chauvin and three other police officers escalated the disturbance in an attempt to apprehend Floyd. With Chauvin pinning Floyd down, footage from bystanders shook the nation. Before his death, Floyd repeatedly sounded that he could not breathe. An autopsy later showed “asphyxiation from sustained pressure.” Another report associated heart disease to his death. All involved officers were fired and charged. Protests, violent riots, looting, murders, and arson developed instantly across the U.S., growing into a public revolution over police cruelty.


What About Now?

Most police officers are committed and ethical. They work a difficult, life-threatening job, and their days are extraordinarily stressful. However, police officers also exercise a great deal of control over the lives of the people they interact with, and an abuse of this power is particularly egregious. The personal injury lawyers at The Cochran Firm have experience helping the innocent victims of police brutality pursue justice and compensation.

The physical, emotional, financial, and legal consequences of police brutality can be staggering. We place a lot of trust in the police, and a betrayal of that trust should not go unacknowledged or un-pursued. Our police brutality lawyers will not allow that.

At The Cochran Firm, we will be there for you. Our police brutality lawyers will listen to your story and advise you on how best to proceed with your claim.

If you’ve been the victim of police brutality, a personal injury lawyer can help. Please call The Cochran Firm’s 24/7 call center today at 1-800-THE-FIRM (673-1555) or send us a message on our website.

Nassau County Jury Returns $1.45 Million Verdict for Client of Pegalis Law Group

New Hyde Park, July 2020… On March 16, 2020, in one of the last civil jury verdicts due to the Corona virus, a Nassau County jury returned a $1.45 million verdict against Dr. Louis Tiger—a Massapequa physician—in favor of the Estate of Alexandra Hernandez—a 52 year old wife and mother. According to trial attorney Robert V. Fallarino of Pegalis Law Group, “The jury found the doctor negligent for failing to perform a simple blood test to evaluate Alexandra’s kidney function, before giving her an injection of Reclast to strengthen her bones. This is a very common treatment for post-menopause osteoporosis, but it is known to cause kidney damage if given to at-risk women.” A kidney function blood test is the only way to know if a patient is at-risk and is required to be obtained before infusing the medication. Dr. Tiger’s failure to take this simple safety check caused Mrs. Hernandez to go into kidney failure, thereby requiring a respirator, dialysis and additional treatments for all of the injuries caused by the doctor’s malpractice. Although she came off the respirator for a short time, Alexandra continued to deteriorate because of the Reclast induced kidney injury. This led to a cascade of events that culminated in her death, after being in the hospital for almost two months. 

The trial took over three weeks in front of Nassau County Supreme Court Justice: Hon. Jeffrey Brown. The jury heard the testimony of experts in Rheumatology from a Harvard-affiliated hospital, a Nephrologist from the Johns Hopkins Hospital, and a kidney Pathologist from NYU Langone Hospital. These experts explained what must occur before a doctor can give someone Reclast. They described how Alexandra’s kidney biopsy showed the exact injuries you would expect from Reclast, and how she languished and died, just as someone who got Reclast would, when they should not have. 

After coming back to Nassau County Supreme Court—as all non-essential court business was suspended and despite concerns about the Corona virus—the Jury spent more than one day deliberating before rendering the verdict in favor of this Nassau County woman, her husband and family. In addition to the $1.45 million verdict, the parties stipulated to some medical expenses and economic damages that will add at least another $350,000 to the verdict. Robert V. Fallarino presented to the jury that this was a very simple case involving the failure of Dr. Tiger to simply use the known and accepted safety check. Mr. Fallarino explained that what happened to his client after the drug was given might seem very complicated at first, but the failure by the doctor was very simple, and very tragic. 

About Us: Pegalis Law Group, LLC is a New York law firm for those suffering as a result of preventable medical errors and personal injury. For nearly 50 years, we have won some of the largest verdicts and settlements in state history. We strive for medical accountability by advocating for clients and through public education, to ensure safer medical practices for better patient care. Visit us at and on YouTubeTwitterFacebook and LinkedIn. 

Cure Boredom with Courtroom Video Coverage by CVN


Tired of Netflix and itching to get back into court? Let the country’s top attorneys help. 


CVN’s curated collection of trial videos highlights some of the nation’s best lawyers in critical moments of their biggest trials. With a library featuring hundreds of video clips, you will discover the trial techniques that The National Trial Lawyers leaders Joe Fried, Mark Lanier, John Romano, and others used to secure blockbuster verdicts. It is the best of CVN’s unrivaled video coverage, and it is yours FREE for being a National Trial Lawyers member.


To receive your free National Trial Lawyers exclusive member subscription to CVN Essentials, fill out this simple registration form. Members can also use code NTL25 for 25% off an annual subscription to the entire CVN video archive.


Telework with The National Trial Lawyers’ CVN Essentials Member Value Upgrade




Telework with The National Trial Lawyers’ CVN Essentials Member Value Upgrade


Trials on hold? Currently teleworking? The National Trial Lawyers, in partnership with Courtroom View Network (CVN), is providing current members with FREE access to CVN Essentials, a curated legal video library of 250+ video clips featuring key moments of trials from all around the country. Members of The National Trial Lawyers also receive a NEW upgraded discount of 25% off an annual subscription to the entire CVN video archive using code NTL25.


Take some time during this hold to watch and learn from fellow National Trial Lawyers members like John Romano and Mark Lanier on CVN’s video library. Observe the most significant moments of numerous trials while CVN’s expert commentary explains why these moments were crucial to the verdicts.

To receive your FREE National Trial Lawyers exclusive member subscription to CVN Essentials, please fill out this simple registration form. Members can also use code NTL25 for 25% off an annual subscription to the entire CVN video archive.

Texas Personal Injury Attorney, Greg Baumgartner, Named to Elite National Trial Lawyers: Top 100



Greg Baumgartner this week received an honor limited to just 100 individuals in each state. He was named to the National Trial Lawyers: Top 100. And that is no minor accomplishment considering there are 1.3 million attorneys in the United States and that the American Bar Association is actively working to address a shortage of qualified trial lawyers.

Baumgartner is the founder of the Baumgartner Law Firm, a leading personal injury practice based in Houston. With over 30 years of experience, he spends his days – and many nights – helping personal injury victims and their families throughout Texas battle large corporations and insurance companies. Yet it is a decision he made in more recent years that he says set him on the path to the elite designation.

“I have always rigorously fought for each of my clients. Yet I have been especially affected on a personal level by the cases where families lost loved ones in wrongful death accidents or individual clients’ lives were drastically altered as the result of a serious injury – especially in the cases of car accidents and truck wrecks,” Baumgartner explained. “A few years ago, I limited the scope of my practice to concentrate on a limited number of these cases so I can devote maximum time and attention to get them the compensation they deserve. The close working relationships that result from that level of involvement has been life-changing, and today I count many former clients and their family members as close friends.”

National Trial Lawyers is not the first organization to award Baumgartner’s skills. He has been rated as a Preeminent attorney for over 15 years, named a Top Lawyer by Houstonia Magazine, is a two-time Who’s Who recipient, received perfect Martindale ratings from both peers and clients, received a perfect rating from Avvo, and was named by Newsweek to its list of the best personal injury lawyers. He is also among the less than one percent of attorneys nationally to hold double law degrees: in his case, a juris doctor from the University of Nebraska and a master of law from the University of Denver. He is admitted to practice law by both the Colorado and Texas State Bar Associations and is a member of the American Bar Association.

The National Trial Lawyers: Top 100 is an invitation-only organization composed of the premier trial lawyers from each state or region who meet stringent qualifications as civil plaintiff and/or criminal defense trial lawyers. Selection is based on a multi-phase process which includes peer nominations and third-party research. Membership is extended only to the most qualified attorneys from each state or region who demonstrate superior qualifications of leadership, reputation, influence, stature and public profile measured by standards in compliance that comply with state bar and national rules.

For more information about Baumgartner and the Baumgartner Law Firm, go to  

Read the source article at

Member value increases for The National Trial Lawyers with CVN Essentials





The National Trial Lawyers is excited to announce a new partnership with Courtroom View Network (CVN) to provide current members with FREE access to CVN Essentials, a curated legal video library of 250+ video clips featuring key moments of trials from all around the country. Members of The National Trial Lawyers are also eligible for 15% off an annual subscription to the entire CVN video archive of over 1,500 fully recorded proceedings.


CVN is the only news outlet that records, broadcasts, and archives gavel-to-gavel video of important American civil trials. Prominent National Trial Lawyers members are featured on CVN including John Romano, Mark Lanier, Brian Panish, and many more. CVN’s video library also includes testimony from numerous expert witnesses and excerpts that allow users to learn how some of the top attorneys in America handle every aspect of their trials. Users will observe the most significant moments of numerous trials while CVN’s expert commentary delves deep into why these moments were crucial to the verdicts.

To receive your FREE National Trial Lawyers exclusive member subscription to CVN Essentials, please fill out this simple registration form.