The National Trial Lawyers
  • Home
    • Meet Our Team
    • Contact Us
    • Mission & Goals
    • FAQ
  • Webinars
  • News
  • Membership Directory
    • Top 100 Map – Civil Plaintiff
    • Top 100 Map – Criminal Defense
    • Top 40 Under 40 Map – Civil Plaintiff
    • Top 40 Under 40 Map – Criminal Defense
  • Top 100
    • Civil Plaintiff Officers / Executive Committee
    • Criminal Defense Officers / Executive Committee
    • Benefits
    • About
    • Top 100 President’s Message
    • Diplomat
    • Membership Renewal
    • Member Profile Updates
    • Top 100 Badge
    • Media
  • Top 40
    • Civil Plaintiff Officers / Executive Committee
    • Criminal Defense Officers / Executive Committee
    • Top 40 Under 40 Trial Academy Bootcamp
    • Benefits
    • About
    • Top 40 President’s Message
    • Membership Renewal
    • Member Profile Updates
    • Top 40 Badge
    • Media
  • Specialty Assoc
    • About
    • Shop
    • Officers
    • Membership Renewal
    • Member Profile Updates
    • Media
  • Nominate
    • Top 100
    • Top 40
    • Specialty Association
    • Trial Lawyer Hall of Fame
    • Trial Lawyer of the Year
    • Trial Team of the Year
    • America’s Most Influential Trial Lawyer
    • America’s Most Influential Law Firm
    • Lifetime Achievement Award
  • Shop
  • Magazine
    • A-List
  • Education and Networking Agenda
    • Trial Lawyers Summit
      • Summit Sponsors
    • Top 40 Under 40 Trial Academy Boot Camp
    • Mass Torts Made Perfect
    • The Lanier Master Class 5.0 Trial Academy 2021
    • Webinars
  • Hall of Fame
    • Trial Lawyer Hall of Fame

Former St. Louis Police Officer Awarded $7.5M in Sexual Harassment, Retaliation Case

Posted on March 25, 2014 by Andrew Findley
legal news for consumers

Former St. Louis, MO police canine officer Tanisha Ross-Paige was awarded a $7.5 million verdict

A St. Louis jury has awarded $7.5 million to a former police officer claiming she was sexually harassed and retaliated against by her supervisor.  The National Trial Lawyers Top 100 attorney John Eccher represented the plaintiff, Tanisha Ross-Paige, and described the verdict as “absolutely huge for this kind of case.”

Ross-Paige claimed that her former supervisor, Sgt. Steven Gori, created and distributed a “wanted” poster with a photo of her and comments such as “subject wanted for having the baddest body in the St. Louis area,” and “use extreme caution when approaching this subject.  Approach this subject from behind for your own safety.”  Ross-Paige also said that Gori invited her to skinny dip in his hot tub, asked her to sit on his lap, and to remove her bullet-resistant vest so he could get a better view of her body.  Eccher said Gori denied the accusations.

Read about other Top Jury Verdicts

Birth Trauma Verdict of $20M for Mother Dumped from Hospital


Nurse Awarded $500,000 for Injury in Fall at R.I. Veterans Home


$2.88M Verdict in Med-Mal Case of Man Driven to Suicide by Pain


$11.2 Million Verdict in CA Loan Fraud Case

After Ross-Paige filed a complaint about Gori’s behavior, Gori and then-Lt. Michael Deeba assigned her to unfavorable shifts, changed her performance reviews, and denied her time off for training, according to the lawsuit.  Deeba also reportedly told others that Ross-Paige’s complaint was frivolous and he wanted her transferred.

The jury found in favor of the St. Louis Board of Police Commissioners on a discrimination claim, but awarded Ross-Paige $300,000 in compensatory damages and $7.2 million in punitive damages.  Another lawyer representing Ross-Paige, Ryan Paulus, said the verdict may be the highest in Missouri history for this kind of case, although he cautioned that it could be reduced to approximately $3 million under state law.  Attorneys said the legal maximum could be increased if the Board of Police Commissioners appeals the verdict.  Eccher said he believes the jury returned a large verdict on punitive damages because attorneys repeatedly caught police officers lying while testifying.

Ross-Paige’s attorneys said they offered to settle the case for either $250,000 or $100,000 plus the approval of her disability claim.  They said attorneys for the police board offered no more than $80,000.

Posted in Blog

Comments are closed.

News Categories

Subscribe to Blog and VFJ via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog, the Voice for Justice and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Read about other Top Jury Verdicts

What is Sexual Harassment?

What is Sexual Harassment?

Sexual Harassment Defined: Legally, sexual harassment is a form of sex discrimination that violates Title VII of the [Read More...]
Facebook Pays $650M to Settle a Privacy Dispute

Facebook Pays $650M to Settle a Privacy Dispute

WASHINGTON: A US federal judge has given final approval to Facebook's US$650 million payment to settle a privacy dispute betw[Read More...]
Pharmaceutical Giant Johnson & Johnson is Preparing $3.9B for Talc Settlements

Pharmaceutical Giant Johnson & Johnson is Preparing $3.9B for Talc Settlements

Pharmaceutical giant Johnson & Johnson has set aside $3.9 billion for talc-related litigation, according to a regulatory [Read More...]
Alaska Airlines Will Pay $3.19M Following the Death of a Passenger

Alaska Airlines Will Pay $3.19M Following the Death of a Passenger

Seattle-based Alaska Airlines has been ordered to pay more than $3 million to the family of a passenger of reduced mobility w[Read More...]
No thumbnail available

Keith Givens on the Trial Lawyers Summit and Lanier Trial Academy

https://vimeo.com/515910581 Michelle Swanner, Executive Director of The National Trial Lawyers, interviews Keith Givens[Read More...]

#LegalNews

@@TheNTLtop100

Contact Us | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

Attorney information and content provided on this website is provided for the benefit of members of The National Trial Lawyers and as a public service by Legal Associations Management, Inc. The website and all data are the property of Legal Associations Management, Inc. Data, including without limitation attorney information and content, on the site may not be mined, sold, or used commercially for any purpose without the explicit written consent of Legal Associations Management, Inc. This site may not be accessed by any automated program for extracting data for any use. By accessing and using the site you agree that you will not develop, support or use software, devices, scripts, robots, or any other means or processes (including crawlers, browser plug-ins and add-ons, or any other technology) to scrape data or otherwise copy profiles and other data. Unauthorized use or attempted unauthorized use of this system may subject you to both civil and criminal penalties.