The National Trial Lawyers
  • Home
    • Meet Our Team
    • Contact Us
    • Mission & Goals
    • FAQ
  • Webinars
  • News
  • Membership Directory
    • Top 100 Map – Civil Plaintiff
    • Top 100 Map – Criminal Defense
    • Top 40 Under 40 Map – Civil Plaintiff
    • Top 40 Under 40 Map – Criminal Defense
  • Top 100
    • Civil Plaintiff Officers / Executive Committee
    • Criminal Defense Officers / Executive Committee
    • Benefits
    • About
    • Top 100 Presidents Message
    • Diplomat
    • Membership Renewal
    • Member Profile Updates
    • Top 100 Badge
  • Top 40
    • Civil Plaintiff Officers / Executive Committee
    • Criminal Defense Officers / Executive Committee
    • Top 40 Under 40 Trial Academy Bootcamp
    • Benefits
    • About
    • Top 40 Presidents Message
    • Membership Renewal
    • Member Profile Updates
    • Top 40 Badge
  • Specialty Assoc
    • About
    • Shop
    • Officers
    • Membership Renewal
    • Member Profile Updates
  • Nominate
    • Top 100
    • Top 40
    • Specialty Association
    • Trial Lawyer Hall of Fame
    • Trial Lawyer of the Year
    • Trial Team of the Year
    • America’s Most Influential Trial Lawyer
    • America’s Most Influential Law Firm
    • Lifetime Achievement Award
  • Shop
  • Magazine
    • A-List
  • Education and Networking Agenda
    • Trial Lawyers Summit
    • Top 40 Under 40 Trial Academy Boot Camp
    • Mass Torts Made Perfect
    • The Lanier Trial Academy Master Class 6.0
    • The Business Of Law
    • Webinars
  • Hall of Fame
    • Trial Lawyer Hall of Fame

Tennessee Judge Rules Caps on Tort Damages Unconstitutional

Posted on April 23, 2015 by Larry Bodine

shutterstock_133129220A Tennessee judge ruled the state cap on non-economic injury damages is unconstitutional. The state law infringed on an individual’s right to a jury trial.

Damage caps limit the amount of recovery for injured or deceased victims and their families.

The plaintiffs Donald and Beverly Clark filed suit against Aimee Cain and AT&T after a car accident in March 2012.

Before a jury award was decided, AT&T moved for partial summary judgment to cap the damages award at $750,000 pursuant to the Tennessee Civil Justice Act of 2011. The court was set to decide whether the plaintiff could receive damages in excess of $750,000 and whether the cap was constitutional.

The couple sought damages of $22.5 million for pain and suffering damages and loss of enjoyment of life.

The state legislature believed the Tennessee Civil Justice Act would prevent excessive jury awards and prevent harm to businesses and economic development in the state. The legislation capped non-economic damage awards at $750,000 in tort claims.

Jury should decide damages

However, Judge W. Neil Thomas believed the jury should be able to decide damages as it saw fit. Additionally, the damage cap partially infringed upon an individual’s fundamental right to a jury trial.

Judge Thomas’ historical analysis found damages as an essential part of a tort action and attempts to limit the jury’s version of a damages award infringes on the right to a jury trial.

When a fundamental right is at issue the state must meet the heightened burden showing the state had a compelling interest, which outweighed the individual’s interest. The judge stated, Tennessee’s interest was purely economic.

There were no justifications for the number $750,000 and it was never mentioned as an appropriate figure in the state regulation.

The state could not prove there was viable support to conclude that caps on non-economic damages were necessary to aid economic development. Judge Thomas denied AT&T’s motion for summary judgment.

Striking down statutory damage caps

In recent years, several state Supreme Courts including Florida, Missouri, and Illinois have struck down statutory damage caps. [find another story we’ve published]

Timesfreepress.com reported that some Tennessee leaders were stunned by the recent decision and will be interested to see how the Tennessee Supreme Court reacts to the verdict.

This case is Clark vs. Cain, et. al., Case No. 12C1147, Circuit Court of Hamilton County, Tennessee Division IV.

Posted in Auto Accidents, Blog, Civil Rights

Comments are closed.

News Categories

Read about other Top Jury Verdicts

Walgreens Agrees to a $105 Million Shareholders Settlement

Walgreens Agrees to a $105 Million Shareholders Settlement

Walgreens Boots Alliance Inc (WBA.O) agreed to pay $105 million to settle a long-running class-action lawsuit accus[Read More...]
A Military Couple Reaches a $15 Million Settlement With Tripler Hospital Over Botched Delivery

A Military Couple Reaches a $15 Million Settlement With Tripler Hospital Over Botched Delivery

A federal judge in Hawaii has approved a $15 million settlement for an Army couple whose son suffered brain damage from lack [Read More...]
Defrauded College Students Will Have $6 Billion Forgiven in a New Settlement

Defrauded College Students Will Have $6 Billion Forgiven in a New Settlement

The Biden administration has agreed to cancel $6 billion in student loans for about 200,000 former students who say they were[Read More...]
An Iowa City Settles Lawsuit Over a Deadly Police Shooting For $5 Million

An Iowa City Settles Lawsuit Over a Deadly Police Shooting For $5 Million

Burlington, Iowa, has agreed to pay $5 million to settle a wrongful death lawsuit brought by the mother of a man who was shot[Read More...]
Co-Owners File a $695 Million Lawsuit Against Georgia Power Over a Contract Dispute

Co-Owners File a $695 Million Lawsuit Against Georgia Power Over a Contract Dispute

The owners of a majority share of a nuclear power plant being expanded in Georgia are suing lead owner Georgia Power Co., cla[Read More...]

#LegalNews

@@TheNTLtop100

Contact Us | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

Attorney information and content provided on this website is provided for the benefit of members of The National Trial Lawyers and as a public service by Legal Associations Management, Inc. The website and all data are the property of Legal Associations Management, Inc. Data, including without limitation attorney information and content, on the site may not be mined, sold, or used commercially for any purpose without the explicit written consent of Legal Associations Management, Inc. This site may not be accessed by any automated program for extracting data for any use. By accessing and using the site you agree that you will not develop, support or use software, devices, scripts, robots, or any other means or processes (including crawlers, browser plug-ins and add-ons, or any other technology) to scrape data or otherwise copy profiles and other data. Unauthorized use or attempted unauthorized use of this system may subject you to both civil and criminal penalties.