The National Trial Lawyers
  • Home
    • Meet Our Team
    • Contact Us
    • Mission & Goals
    • FAQ
  • Webinars
  • News
  • Membership Directory
    • Top 100 Map – Civil Plaintiff
    • Top 100 Map – Criminal Defense
    • Top 40 Under 40 Map – Civil Plaintiff
    • Top 40 Under 40 Map – Criminal Defense
  • Top 100
    • Civil Plaintiff Officers / Executive Committee
    • Criminal Defense Officers / Executive Committee
    • Benefits
    • About
    • Top 100 Presidents Message
    • Diplomat
    • Membership Renewal
    • Member Profile Updates
    • Top 100 Badge
  • Top 40
    • Civil Plaintiff Officers / Executive Committee
    • Criminal Defense Officers / Executive Committee
    • Top 40 Under 40 Trial Academy Bootcamp
    • Benefits
    • About
    • Top 40 Presidents Message
    • Membership Renewal
    • Member Profile Updates
    • Top 40 Badge
  • Specialty Assoc
    • About
    • Shop
    • Officers
    • Membership Renewal
    • Member Profile Updates
  • Nominate
    • Top 100
    • Top 40
    • Specialty Association
    • Trial Lawyer Hall of Fame
    • Trial Lawyer of the Year
    • Trial Team of the Year
    • America’s Most Influential Trial Lawyer
    • America’s Most Influential Law Firm
    • Lifetime Achievement Award
  • Shop
  • Magazine
    • A-List
  • Education and Networking Agenda
    • Trial Lawyers Summit
    • Top 40 Under 40 Trial Academy Boot Camp
    • Mass Torts Made Perfect
    • The Lanier Trial Academy Master Class 6.0
    • The Business Of Law
    • Webinars
  • Hall of Fame
    • Trial Lawyer Hall of Fame

Sixth Circuit Affirms $1.5 Million Sexual Harassment Suit Against High-Tech Company

Posted on May 19, 2015 by Larry Bodine

shutterstock_170638796The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a $1.5 million verdict against a high-tech company for a manager’s sexual harassment and retaliation against three female employees.

The defendant, New Breed Logistics, now known as XPO Logistics-Supply Chain, is based in High Point, NC.

The company provides a number of services to consumers to improve the warehouse operations through technological advancements and infrastructure.

Refused his advances

The three temporary female workers involved were employees of the New Breed Memphis, Tennessee, warehouse. The employees alleged the supervisor sexually harassed them and terminated them after they refused his advances.

The EEOC filed suit against the company in 2010 for violation of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The lower court found in favor of the EEOC.

On appeal the defendant argued that it was entitled to judgment as a matter of law or a new trial for the retaliation and the sexual harassment verdict.

The Supervisor’s Illegal Actions

See also: Jury Awards $499,000 Against EmCare in Sexual Harassment and Retaliation Case

The female employees testified the supervisor began making sexual comments several times a day.  A fellow forklift driver, working in the same department, overheard the comments.

One female employee stated the comments often involved physical contact. On one occasion after an employee requested he cease his advances, the supervisor responded, “he wasn’t going to get in trouble, that he ran the area and anyone who [told] on him would be fired.”

All three female employees were fired on separate occasions. The male employee who stood up for the female workers also lost his job. The company alleged his termination was due to time clock improprieties.

Two female employees were transferred to different departments prior to their termination. The transfers occurred after an anonymous complaint was filed through a company-sponsored hotline.

The matter was barely investigated, according to the opinion–the investigator only asked the harassing supervisor five questions and failed to speak to any additional employees or witnesses.

The former supervisor falsely informed the new department head, that she would need to keep an eye on the employees because they “liked to start altercations.”

Title VII Claims

 To prevail in a Title VII retaliation claim the EEOC had to establish that the claimants:

  • Engaged in an activity covered by Title VII
  • The defendants knew of the protected activity;
  • Thereafter the defendant took adverse action against the plaintiffs; and
  • A causal connection existed between the protected activity and the materially adverse action. Taylor v. Geithner, 703 F.3d 328, 336 (6th Cir. 2013).

 

The defense argued that telling a supervisor to stop his actions did not constitute a protected activity under Title VII. However, the court believed the opposite was true–that a protected activity can be simply telling a manager to stop. Protection exists not only for filing formal complaints but complaints to management.

See also: Former St. Louis Police Officer Awarded $7.5M in Sexual Harassment, Retaliation Case

The court also believed the jury could have reasonably concluded the former supervisor influenced the new supervisor’s decision to recommend termination for two female employees.

Although the supervisor attributed the termination to poor performance, the employees were only in the department for one week. The only conversation between the supervisors occurred on the day the employee was terminated and when the former supervisor disparaged the females work ethic.

The court quickly addressed the causation argument stating the terminations would not have occurred but for the disparaging remarks given by the harassing supervisor and his actions were motivated by retaliation.

The court ultimately concluded the district court did not err in its decision to deny the defendant a judgment as a matter of law or new trial on the issue of damages, retaliation and violations under Title VII. The jury was presented with sufficient evidence that the conduct by the supervisors made New Breed vicariously liable for the illegal actions.

This case is Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. New Breed Logistics, Case No. 13-6250, United State District Court for the Western District of Tennessee at Memphis.

Posted in Blog, Civil Rights, Employment

Comments are closed.

News Categories

Read about other Top Jury Verdicts

Why You Might Need an Attorney This Summer If You Travel

Why You Might Need an Attorney This Summer If You Travel

Travel is not a new notion to us; it can be traced back to wealthy Greeks and Romans who left for leisure to their summe[Read More...]
Walgreens Agrees to a $105 Million Shareholders Settlement

Walgreens Agrees to a $105 Million Shareholders Settlement

Walgreens Boots Alliance Inc (WBA.O) agreed to pay $105 million to settle a long-running class-action lawsuit accus[Read More...]
A Military Couple Reaches a $15 Million Settlement With Tripler Hospital Over Botched Delivery

A Military Couple Reaches a $15 Million Settlement With Tripler Hospital Over Botched Delivery

A federal judge in Hawaii has approved a $15 million settlement for an Army couple whose son suffered brain damage from lack [Read More...]
Defrauded College Students Will Have $6 Billion Forgiven in a New Settlement

Defrauded College Students Will Have $6 Billion Forgiven in a New Settlement

The Biden administration has agreed to cancel $6 billion in student loans for about 200,000 former students who say they were[Read More...]
An Iowa City Settles Lawsuit Over a Deadly Police Shooting For $5 Million

An Iowa City Settles Lawsuit Over a Deadly Police Shooting For $5 Million

Burlington, Iowa, has agreed to pay $5 million to settle a wrongful death lawsuit brought by the mother of a man who was shot[Read More...]

#LegalNews

@@TheNTLtop100

Contact Us | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

Attorney information and content provided on this website is provided for the benefit of members of The National Trial Lawyers and as a public service by Legal Associations Management, Inc. The website and all data are the property of Legal Associations Management, Inc. Data, including without limitation attorney information and content, on the site may not be mined, sold, or used commercially for any purpose without the explicit written consent of Legal Associations Management, Inc. This site may not be accessed by any automated program for extracting data for any use. By accessing and using the site you agree that you will not develop, support or use software, devices, scripts, robots, or any other means or processes (including crawlers, browser plug-ins and add-ons, or any other technology) to scrape data or otherwise copy profiles and other data. Unauthorized use or attempted unauthorized use of this system may subject you to both civil and criminal penalties.